NAVEX One vs Thomson Reuters Accelus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NAVEX Logo
228 views|205 comparisons
Thomson Reuters Logo
351 views|181 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NAVEX One and Thomson Reuters Accelus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
228
Comparisons
205
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
351
Comparisons
181
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Lockpath Keylight
Accelus
Learn More
NAVEX
Video Not Available
Thomson Reuters
Video Not Available
Overview
NAVEX. Building a safer, stronger, and sustainable future through intelligent risk management. We believe confidence in tomorrow begins with smart risk & compliance decisions today. With more than 13,000 customers worldwide, we offer the most comprehensive tools and support to help them better understand their risk and compliance health, and to manage their GRC program more simply and efficiently.

Our NAVEX One Platform offers solutions that are built on the world’s largest database of risk intelligence information. It enables organizations to create more effective and efficient governance, risk, compliance and ESG programs. NAVEX One provides the holistic view of risk, automated processes, and insights needed to promote strong cultures, protect against unwanted risk and preserve the environment through sustainable practices.

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Sample Customers
Claims Recovery Financial Services (CRFS), Surescript, The University of Chicago
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company10%
Healthcare Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm37%
Comms Service Provider16%
Computer Software Company8%
Real Estate/Law Firm7%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NAVEX One is ranked 28th in GRC while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 24th in GRC. NAVEX One is rated 0.0, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. On the other hand, NAVEX One is most compared with OneTrust GRC, ServiceNow and NAVEX Global, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with FIS Protegent and RSA Archer.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.