Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nagios Core vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Nagios and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Nagios is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #62 with an average rating of 8.0. Nagios holds a 2.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Nagios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Nagios Core
Read 51 Nagios Core reviews
  • 4,590 Views
  • 4,039 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 378 Views
  • 299 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Nagios Core and OpenText Network Operations Management are leading products in the network monitoring sector. OpenText Network Operations Management appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Nagios Core is notable for its open-source model, extensive monitoring capabilities, and wide plugin compatibility. OpenText Network Operations Management offers integrated solutions with advanced analytics, automation, and comprehensive feature integration that sets it apart as a more robust option.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Core could improve with automated deployment options, enhanced user interface, and increased scalability for larger networks. OpenText Network Operations Management might benefit from a more competitive pricing model, streamlined update processes, and reduced complexity in initial setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core is simple to set up manually, appealing to those seeking customization. OpenText Network Operations Management provides a streamlined deployment experience with dedicated customer support, enhancing overall user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core is cost-effective, offering low setup costs and favorable ROI for basic monitoring needs. OpenText Network Operations Management, while requiring a higher upfront investment, provides superior functionality and long-term ROI, appealing to businesses seeking advanced capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
10th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th)
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
62nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 2.8%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services."
"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."
"Nagios monitors our servers, so we know if anything goes wrong and can solve the problem before it happens."
"The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful."
"Nagios Core is stable."
"Key features include the GUI interface, its notification capabilities, and the real-time reporting."
"It has made the life of the network operations staff more proactive in managing the resources of the infrastructure. It prevents disasters long before they can take place."
"It is fairly easy to set up, and we can monitor pretty much everything we want to."
More Nagios Core pros
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
 

Cons

"Nagios Core could improve by adding a user interface. If you want the user interface you have to use Nagios XI."
"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."
"The tool needs to improve the integrations."
"Bandwidth monitoring is the pain point for me because Nagios Core does not monitor bandwidth effectively like Cacti does."
"The dashboard should be improved."
"It is a bit slow due to latency."
"There is room for improvement in the graphics."
"Nagios Core can improve the graphical interface, it would make things a little easier."
More Nagios Core cons
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the free version of Nagios Core."
"Most the plugin features are free."
"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."
"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."
"Nagios Core is a cheap solution."
"It's free."
"The product is cheaply priced."
"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."
More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?
What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?
Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nagios Core?
The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core Logo
Icinga vs Nagios Core
Compared 25% of the time
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core Logo
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core
Compared 16% of the time
Zabbix vs Nagios Core Logo
Zabbix vs Nagios Core
Compared 12% of the time
Centreon vs Nagios Core Logo
Centreon vs Nagios Core
Compared 8% of the time
Checkmk vs Nagios Core Logo
Checkmk vs Nagios Core
Compared 5% of the time
More Nagios Core Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core
June 2025
Nagios Core reportDownload Nagios Core product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
June 2025
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
July 2025
Free Report: Nagios Core vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Nagios Core vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nagios Core vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.