

Find out what your peers are saying about PostgreSQL, Oracle, ClickHouse and others in Open Source Databases.
I have seen a return on investment with MySQL, as it allows us to manage with fewer employees, focusing on business logic rather than database management.
The efficiency has increased significantly, and our workflows are consolidated into a single platform, thus reducing the operational overhead we previously faced.
The objective was to scale as data loads with high-performing query model responses.
I have seen a return on investment in terms of time saved.
I would rate the documentation and online support a 10 out of 10.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
The customer support is very proactive and responsive twenty-four hours per day, seven days per week.
Their team is capable of resolving issues efficiently, allowing users to create tickets and receive support.
We have our own account manager who keeps us informed of the latest solutions and improvements in the system.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
MySQL's scalability is currently adequate, as we have increased operations from ten thousand to twelve thousand devices, and it is working fine for us.
As our data volumes grow, we can expand resources without significant performance degradation.
SingleStore's scalability is really nice, as the process model includes master aggregator and slave aggregators or child aggregators, making it very well scalable both vertically and horizontally.
I have added both storage and additional instances many times, and it worked perfectly.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
From my experience, MySQL was pretty stable.
It handles large workloads and maintains consistent performance very well overall.
The performance and usability of SingleStore as a main database engine are significantly superior to other both paid and open-source solutions.
I have not seen any downtime.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
The load balancer, MySQL LB, which is used to connect to the application, lacks clear documentation.
Error handling needs attention. When it fails due to memory, it only indicates that but not exactly in which process it failed.
The data which is sent to DataDog sometimes does not match with the SingleStore dashboard.
Better documentation for advanced use cases, especially where data volumes are very high and queries are frequent, would help us manage the feature more efficiently.
Oracle has different components, so if you need security, you have to procure a different license, but here everything is inbuilt and it's not costly.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it can be a bit expensive for startups.
The setup cost was surprisingly good, and our transfer to Helios was almost seamless, as far as databases go, and it was not expensive.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
The main feature we utilize in MySQL is the view, and I can say that it is the most valuable feature for our needs.
MySQL contributes to improved system reliability, faster application performance, and higher developer productivity.
SingleStore has impacted my organization positively by enabling us to run low-latency analytics and model-driven use cases at scale, which is quite difficult for OLAP and OLTP databases alone.
A very nice and useful feature is its compatibility with MySQL API, letting any system that can connect to MySQL also connect to SingleStore, thus solving many interoperability issues with different systems.
SingleStore is a distributed database that has the advantage that at any moment when resources are insufficient, there is a possibility to add more nodes, and everything is added online.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| MySQL | 12.7% |
| PostgreSQL | 11.8% |
| Firebird SQL | 10.1% |
| Other | 65.4% |
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| SingleStore | 3.7% |
| Amazon RDS | 12.7% |
| MongoDB Atlas | 10.3% |
| Other | 73.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 75 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 64 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.
MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.
What are MySQL's key features?MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.
SingleStore delivers the performance you need for enterprise AI, providing the most performant data platform for apps and analytics at scale. SingleStore enables organizations to scale from one to one million customers in one unified platform. SingleStore offers transparent pricing as shown here https://www.singlestore.com/pricing/
SingleStore caters to over 400 customers globally, including major banks and tech companies in 50+ countries and 40+ verticals. It offers seamless scaling for both transactional and analytical workloads, simplifying data management with its MySQL compatibility and real-time processing capabilities. SingleStore's distributed architecture ensures speed and reliability, efficiently handling large data volumes.
What are the key features of SingleStore?
What benefits can users find in SingleStore reviews?
Top banks and fintech companies leverage SingleStore for efficient management of financial data, while media and telecom industries use it for scalable metadata management and improved data processing. Retail and eCommerce sectors benefit from enhanced transactional capabilities, reducing the need for separate databases and optimizing reporting processes. SingleStore's capacity to unite diverse workloads makes it a strategic choice across many sectors.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.