MuleSoft Composer vs Toad Data Point comparison

Salesforce and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8, while Quest Software is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0. Salesforce holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
672 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Toad Data Point

Read 5 Toad Data Point reviews

1,268 Views
850 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Toad Data Point

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Toad Data Point and MuleSoft Composer are key players in data management and integration. MuleSoft Composer appears to have the advantage due to its comprehensive integration features, offering superior automation and application workflow capabilities.

Features: Toad Data Point provides robust database access, advanced data preparation, and efficient handling of diverse data sources. Its strengths include data connectivity and transformation capabilities. MuleSoft Composer rapidly integrates applications with user-friendly design, allowing easy mapping and connection with minimal technical obstacles. It excels in automating and streamlining operational workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Toad Data Point focuses on local deployment for straightforward data management tasks, ensuring easy setup. MuleSoft Composer offers flexible cloud-based deployment suitable for various business sizes, backed by strong customer service support, facilitating swift integration solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Toad Data Point presents favorable initial setup costs that align with its data-centric capabilities, ensuring efficient ROI. MuleSoft Composer requires a higher initial investment justified by superior integration features, offering the potential for enhanced long-term ROI through increased operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. Toad Data Point Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Toad Data Point

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

Toad Data Point

Ranking in Data Integration

30th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Preparation Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toad Data Point is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.7%
Toad Data Point	0.8%
Other	98.5%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2686479

Works

Facilitates seamless connections and automation across multiple data sources

Toad Data Point should include more features for utilizing AI, which can automatically perform many tasks. The tool should have a feature where, if I convert my Oracle connection, the code, whether a select statement or anything else, should automatically convert into Oracle format. The same with SQL. When connecting to SQL, the code should be in SQL format, and when connecting to Teradata, it should be in Teradata format. Since not everyone knows all languages, there should be a feature that automatically converts code into the desired format. It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"We love it."

"The most valuable features of Toad Data are you could write a parameterized query and it wouldn't error out, it would give you the parameters that you could input. The auto-formatting feature is useful because it was great for keeping your queries neat and understandable. The auto comment, and uncomment toggles that you could do were convenient."

"The best thing about it is its automation features."

"One of the greatest features is that you can get data from anywhere to anywhere with Toad Data Point."

"It provides better SQL development tooling than SQL Developer, which is not a sufficient tool for all development use cases. It offers power developers the tools they need."

"With Toad Data Point, I can automate most steps automatically."

"I have never experienced any issues with customer service."

Cons

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version. Scalability is difficult when it is that costly."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version."

"It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Point?

The pricing for Toad Data Point is where it gets into trouble. Microsoft is free, so if you get SQL Server, you get all the other stuff with it. You have to use several Microsoft tools that don't a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Point?

I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad Data Point?

When I use it, I'm using it for writing SQL or testing SQL code. I used to use it for moving data, loading files into database tables, from tables to other tables.

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Teradata vs Toad Data Point

Compared 17% of the time

SAS Enterprise Guide vs Toad Data Point

Compared 15% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Toad Data Point

Compared 14% of the time

SSIS vs Toad Data Point

Compared 13% of the time

SAS Access vs Toad Data Point

Compared 10% of the time

More Toad Data Point Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point

January 2026

Download Toad Data Point product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

No data available

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Toad Data Point is a cross-platform, self-service, data-integration tool that simplifies data access, preparation and provisioning. It provides nearly limitless data connectivity, desktop data integration, visual query building and workflow automation.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Concordia University

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Toad Data Point

January 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. Toad Data Point

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. Toad Data Point and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Toad Data Point report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.