Microsoft OneDrive vs Objective ECM comparison

The compared Microsoft and Objective solutions aren't in the same category. Microsoft is ranked #11 in CCP , and holds a 9.8% mindshare in the category. Objective is ranked #19 in ECM , and holds a 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Microsoft OneDrive

Read 19 Microsoft OneDrive reviews

1,668 Views
371 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Objective ECM

Read 1 Objective ECM review

371 Views
291 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Microsoft OneDrive

Objective ECM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft OneDrive and Objective ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Content Collaboration Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Content Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Content Collaboration Platforms

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 853,960 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft OneDrive

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Content Collaboration Platforms (11th)

Objective ECM

Average Rating

4.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (19th)

Mindshare comparison

Microsoft OneDrive and Objective ECM aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Microsoft OneDrive is designed for Content Collaboration Platforms and holds a mindshare of 9.8%, down 13.2% compared to last year.
Objective ECM, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Content Management, holds 1.2% mindshare, down 1.7% since last year.

Content Collaboration Platforms

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Victor Bayouwa

Owner at VBTECH-IT

I love the backup capabilities and the offline sync

We use OneDrive to share documents throughout the organization and collaborate. It is also used for backups. The backup capability is one feature I love about OneDrive. I also like how it syncs when you're working offline. Everything is updated once you connect again. It takes too long for…

Read full review

it_user144594

Engineer at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The ability to have duplicate document names is very useful for content migration. During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place.

During trouble-shooting you will discover that the logs are all over the place - even on servers you would not expect - and fragmented into dozens of files, yet the detail is excellent. It's Java execution logs, so needs a bit of interpretation skill, though. Speaking of Java, the web interface requires JRE and degrades in mysterious ways without it: No warnings or graceful fall-back. The web UI is otherwise VERY awkward and limited in functionality. The Windows client on the other hand is extremely dated but rich in functionality - not pretty, though. Despite the API, there is no vendor support for integration into any other systems except through HTML frames.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

853,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

39%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Government

32%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

ShareFile vs Microsoft OneDrive

Compared 17% of the time

Box vs Microsoft OneDrive

Compared 15% of the time

Atlassian Confluence vs Microsoft OneDrive

Compared 13% of the time

SharePoint vs Microsoft OneDrive

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon WorkDocs vs Microsoft OneDrive

Compared 11% of the time

More Microsoft OneDrive Competitors

SharePoint vs Objective ECM

Compared 80% of the time

OpenText Content Manager vs Objective ECM

Compared 20% of the time

More Objective ECM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft OneDrive

May 2025

Download Microsoft OneDrive product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Content Management

May 2025

Download Objective ECM product report

Also Known As

MS OneDrive

No data available

Overview

Microsoft OneDrive for Business gives you online storage that works seamlessly with the tools you use every day to create, communicate, and collaborate from your PC/Mac or your iOS, Android, or Windows device.

Microsoft

Objective ECM is a comprehensive suite of modules that connects content to people and the business systems they work with on a daily basis. Designed to maximise user adoption with zero training, Objective ECM delivers a simple, fast and personal experience that can be shared on a vast scale.

Objective

Sample Customers

Chevron, Accenture, Booz Allen Hamilton, DBS, Nestle, Lowe's, MGM Resorts, Textron, MGM Resorts

ACT Planning and Land Authority, Australian Department of Defence, Barwon Water, City of Darebin, Delta Electricity, NSW Department of Premier and Cabinet, Health Corporate Network, Hobsons Bay City Council, LandCorp, Port of Brisbane

Buyer's Guide

Content Collaboration Platforms

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Dropbox, Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

853,960 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.