Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection comparison

Microsoft and SonicWall are both solutions in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SonicWall is ranked #30. Microsoft holds a 9.2% mindshare in ATP, compared to SonicWall’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SonicWall users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Defender for Endp...
Read 194 Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reviews
  • 2,028 Views
  • 1,591 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
SonicWall Capture Advanced ...
Read 8 SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection reviews
  • 231 Views
  • 154 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint are competitors in the advanced security solutions category. SonicWall is preferred for its dedicated support and flexible pricing, while Microsoft Defender is noted for its seamless integration with other Microsoft services and comprehensive features.

Features: SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is known for high detection accuracy, robust sandboxing capabilities, and detailed threat analysis. It excels in providing specialized threat analysis. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers deep integration with Windows, extensive threat hunting, and automated investigation tools. It has a notable advantage in feature integration and breadth.

Room for Improvement: SonicWall could enhance integration with broader ecosystems and improve user interface intuitiveness. It might also benefit from more streamlined automation options. Microsoft Defender could improve in areas outside the Microsoft ecosystem, optimize resource usage, and offer greater flexibility in non-Windows environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonicWall provides straightforward deployment with customizable options and is highly praised for responsive customer service. Microsoft Defender benefits from ease of integration within the Windows ecosystem, ensuring quick deployment, although it may require more Windows-centric infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is recognized for competitive pricing and flexible packages, offering a promising return on investment. In contrast, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is often perceived as higher in initial cost but is justified by comprehensive protection and simplified management, providing strong long-term ROI in Microsoft-based setups.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Defender for Endp...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
194
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (1st), Anti-Malware Tools (1st), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (3rd), Microsoft Security Suite (5th)
SonicWall Capture Advanced ...
Ranking in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
30th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is 9.2%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
 

Featured Reviews

AnuragSrivastava - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides detailed visibility into threats but the ability to add exceptions needs improvement
One major item for improvement is the ability to add exceptions. We can add some exceptions, but not at the level we need to. The second major area for improvement involves enhanced capabilities for different operating systems or platforms. That is, even though we have coverage for different operating systems or platforms such as Linux, we don't get all of the controls and enhanced capabilities that are available with Windows devices. Reporting could also be improved because, at present, we get limited results at times. For example, in an environment with more than 100,000 devices, you may just get 10,000 results when you run a report.
Read full review
MG
When compared to other solutions, it is cheaper and more economical
The most valuable feature is the alerting system. For a small to medium customer, it is a cost-effective value. It does all the basic requirements. It fulfills all of our requirements. We get alert messages whenever there is a new threat. We are notified at the firewall level that things are blocked, which keeps us in our comfort zone.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint has been secure and there is zero maintenance required because it updates with Microsoft Windows."
"The installation is straightforward."
"The detection features are valuable, as is the fact that it is easier to port these logs into Sentinel. That is also useful for us. It is more comprehensive."
"Defender is stable. The performance is good."
"This is not an inventory solution, but it helps you take count of how many workstations you have, as well as what software is installed on each of them."
"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is beneficial because we are using Microsoft Windows and all the core solutions are made by Microsoft, such as the authentic platform, operating system, and antivirus protection. It is a heterogeneous environment. We had to use third-party solutions before and update everything separately. For example, the policy for antivirus. With Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, when Microsoft Windows receives updates it will update with it. This is one main advantage of this solution."
"The endpoint detection of threats is valuable. The initial detection of things like ransomware and viruses and being able to shut down machines immediately and stop a threat is valuable. We can stop a threat at a source versus allow it to propagate it across the network."
"It is already integrated with Windows 10, so you don't need to worry about that."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pros
"The stability of the solution is good. We haven't had any breaches or crashes. It's been very stable for us."
"I like this setup for a firewall. You can set things up very easily and you can automate items as well. It's a very robust firewall solution for enterprise as well as small businesses."
"The ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) on scanning is the most valuable feature."
"It also has an easy configuration. The feedback that we get from our customers is that it's a good product."
"Provides good protection and security."
"The reporting that you get from it is the most valuable feature. You can see it via the appliance itself, and also via the MySonicWall account for the registered device. You are able to select the file if it's malicious, and you can select it in the reporting and see what triggered it, and things like that. I found that to be quite useful."
"We get alert messages whenever there is a new threat. We are notified at the firewall level that things are blocked, which keeps us in our comfort zone."
"We use it for protection against viruses and ransomware attacks."
More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection pros
 

Cons

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint can improve by providing more and different types of reports."
"Initially, I experienced performance issues that hampered our servers. However, after setting appropriate exclusions, everything seemed to work fine."
"There's a lot of manual effort involved to configure what we need."
"Windows Firewall is integrated with Windows Defender. Over the last few days, I have had a problem with defining a wildcard on Windows Firewall. For example, I wanted to pull out the connection of my program and install a software package with a lot of executable files. I wanted to prevent it from accessing the internet. I could not select executables by using a wildcard. I had to select a single executable with its full name."
"The automation could be simpler on the mitigation side. It has a learning curve. Otherwise, it's pretty easy."
"It's not quite a mature solution just yet. It needs more time to grow and develop."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"In terms of improvement, they update the platform it seems quite a bit. Every month something is in a new spot or something changed somewhere. There should be less of that."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cons
"The setup needs improvement. It needs to be made more user-friendly."
"Having an on-premise solution as well would be an option for some people, but they'll want to use a cloud solution for their sandboxing. Certain sites would want to keep all the checks done on an on-premise appliance. All the checking, rather than sending that up into a cloud engine."
"Could provide online training to allow customers to learn more about the product."
"SonicWall had a recent layoff. This is a concern for us, because now we are missing the local presence from both the engineering and sales side."
"We would like to get immediate alerts from the alerting system without using third-parties."
"If anything at all, it would be some very minor updates that need to be done, but in terms of changes, nothing comes to mind."
"It does fare well against enterprise products."
"I would say the solution needs a much simpler user interface, but the functionality of the firewall is quite extensive. You need the user interface to be that way. However, if there was a way to make the user interface a little easier, that would be great."
More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is an expensive solution."
"There is no licensing fee."
"The license cost is around $35 per machine, which is not expensive compared to other products."
"The solution is free and comes with Windows."
"The licensing fee is a function of your Office 365 license. The feature set you get is a function of the license as well. There is probably an E2 version, an E3 version, and an E5 version. There are several versions, and not all features are the same. So, you might want to check what features you're expecting because you might get shocked. If you only have an E3 license, the capability isn't the same."
"Licensing models of Microsoft are renowned for being complex. We just purchased the whole E5 stack. With E5 licenses for users, we get access to a bunch of features that are not just related to security. I would rate them a three out of five in terms of pricing."
"It's all pretty easy. For some clients, it's an easier sell because it's just an add-on to their existing Microsoft licensing and Office 365 licensing."
"The base price for an E5 license, which includes Enterprise Mobility + Security E5, is $57 per user per month."
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint pricing and cost advice
"The best deal from SonicWall is to buy the HA pair. When you buy the initial one, you receive the second one at a significant discount. If there is an event and something happens to one firewall, then you have the second firewall to roll into. For the price, it's pretty to tough to beat and not a lot of other firewall vendors offer it. You battle for a discount on both. Where with SonicWall, if you buy one, the second one is at half price. It's pretty straightforward."
"It's thirty dollars per user and we have 30 users."
"When you compare it with other solutions, they are cheaper and more economical."
"We get our value for our money."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
25%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Real Estate/Law Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface, applies behavioral-based endpoint protection and response, and includes risk-ba...
See all answers
Which offers better endpoint security - Symantec or Microsoft Defender?
We use Symantec because we do not use MS Enterprise products, but in my opinion, Microsoft Defender is a superior solution. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security s...
See all answers
How does Microsoft Defender for Endpoint compare with Crowdstrike Falcon?
The CrowdStrike solution delivers a lot of information about incidents. It has a very light sensor that will never push your machine hardware to "test", you don't have the usual "scan now" feature ...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Compared 5% of the time
Symantec Endpoint Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Compared 4% of the time
F-Secure Total vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Logo
F-Secure Total vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Compared 4% of the time
HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Compared 4% of the time
More Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Competitors
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 56% of the time
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Logo
Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Compared 44% of the time
More SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
April 2025
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint reportDownload Microsoft Defender for Endpoint product report
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
May 2025
SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection reportDownload SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection product report
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Defender ATP, Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection, MS Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Defender Antivirus
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Microsoft
Demo not available
SonicWall
 

Overview

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for organizations. It offers real-time protection against various types of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, ransomware, and phishing attacks.

With its powerful machine-learning capabilities, it can detect and block sophisticated attacks before they can cause any harm. The solution also includes endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities, allowing organizations to quickly investigate and respond to security incidents. It provides detailed insights into the attack timeline, enabling security teams to understand the scope and impact of an incident.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint also offers proactive threat hunting, allowing organizations to proactively search for and identify potential threats within their network. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft security solutions, such as Microsoft Defender XDR, to provide a unified and holistic security approach. With its centralized management console, organizations can easily deploy, configure, and monitor the security solution across their entire network.

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a robust and scalable security solution that helps organizations protect their endpoints and data from evolving cyber threats.

Microsoft

SonicWall Capture, a cloud based service available with SonicWall firewalls, revolutionizes advanced threat detection and sandboxing with a multi-engine approach to stopping unknown and zero-day attacks at the gateway, and with automated remediation. Customers benefit from high security effectiveness, fast response times and reduced total cost of ownership.

SonicWall
 

Sample Customers

Petrofrac, Metro CSG, Christus Health
Wonder Cement, Foster Clark Products
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
April 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. SonicWall Capture Advanced Threat Protection report.
See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.