Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
Microsoft Configuration Manager enhances productivity and efficiency, with users valuing its operational streamlining despite Mac support challenges.
Sentiment score
7.6
Tenable Vulnerability Management provides long-term cost-effective vulnerability identification and resolution, reducing operational costs and enhancing environment visibility.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.5
Microsoft Configuration Manager's customer support is generally effective, with better experiences from higher-tier and premier support options.
Sentiment score
5.9
User feedback on Tenable's support varies, highlighting issues with response times, accessibility, and additional charges for service.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
I would evaluate Tenable Vulnerability Management's customer service and technical support as average.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Microsoft Configuration Manager efficiently scales across environments, supports high user numbers, integrates with Intune, and aids cloud transitions.
Sentiment score
7.5
Tenable Vulnerability Management is scalable and cost-effective, supporting industries like finance and government with ease of expansion.
The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.9
Microsoft Configuration Manager is stable and reliable, requiring configuration and maintenance, with issues often stemming from external factors.
Sentiment score
8.1
Tenable Vulnerability Management is lauded for stability and reliability, with minor issues, rating between seven and ten.
There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
 

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Configuration Manager needs a streamlined interface, better integration, enhanced automation, improved scalability, and simplified remote management.
Users want improved interface, customization, integration, and support for Tenable Vulnerability Management, with clearer licensing and automation features.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
 

Setup Cost

Microsoft Configuration Manager is costly, especially for setup and licensing, but justified by robust features and integration capabilities.
Tenable Vulnerability Management is pricey but valued for features, with users desiring flexible, cost-effective pricing models.
The setup cost is considered sufficient.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
 

Valuable Features

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT processes with automation, integration, scalability, and comprehensive system management features for enterprises.
Tenable Vulnerability Management offers comprehensive scanning and integration with features enhancing usability, scalability, and security compliance support.
The product valuable for deployment recovery.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
It provides survivability benefits. It helps me understand if the system is capable of withstanding certain levels of stress.
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...
Ranking in Patch Management
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
83
Ranking in other categories
Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (6th), Configuration Management (3rd)
Tenable Vulnerability Manag...
Ranking in Patch Management
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 12.4%, down from 17.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

MikeNelson2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Deployment recovery works well but requires configuration improvements
While I do not use the product frequently, many issues were due to configuration rather than the product itself. I cannot give an exact recommendation as it is not my area of responsibility. The team that uses it finds it adequate. It is presently good enough for us not to investigate other options. Overall, I rate the product a six out of ten.
Mani Bommisetty - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration
Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?
Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...
How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?
ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...
What do you like most about SCCM?
One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...
What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...
What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?
I don't think I have any additional features to add for improvement, as Tenable Vulnerability Management does a pretty good job of what it does. My pain points would have been on the internal side ...
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS
Tenable.io
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Global Payments AU/NZ
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.