Microsoft Configuration Manager vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

1.0

Microsoft Configuration Manager is valued for managing devices, offering cost savings and enhanced productivity, despite some Mac support challenges.

Sentiment score

7.7

Tenable Vulnerability Management provides long-term cost-effective vulnerability identification and resolution, reducing operational costs and enhancing environment visibility.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.5

Microsoft Configuration Manager receives mixed reviews for support, praised for resources but criticized for first-level support effectiveness.

Sentiment score

6.1

User feedback on Tenable's support varies, highlighting issues with response times, accessibility, and additional charges for service.

Their response time and first-level support quality need improvement.

Jakub J

Systems Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For technical support from Microsoft, I would rate them a nine.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The technical support of Tenable Vulnerability Management is available 24/7, and whenever we require support, we can get it within five minutes.

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I would evaluate Tenable Vulnerability Management's customer service and technical support as average.

reviewer2721399

SOC Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.6

Microsoft Configuration Manager scales well for enterprises, though expertise and investments may enhance scalability, especially with cloud integration.

Sentiment score

7.6

Tenable Vulnerability Management is scalable and cost-effective, supporting industries like finance and government with ease of expansion.

The product is suitable for our size, handling 800 devices.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is highly scalable and very user-friendly when it comes to scalability.

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.3

Microsoft Configuration Manager is praised for stability, with issues mostly due to external factors and the need for proper setup.

Sentiment score

8.1

Tenable Vulnerability Management is lauded for stability and reliability, with minor issues, rating between seven and ten.

There were misconfigurations by our team rather than issues with the product itself.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.

Rishabh-Khanna

Technical Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

The stability of Tenable Vulnerability Management is highly reliable.

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Room For Improvement

Microsoft Configuration Manager needs improved integration, automation, Linux compatibility, and enhanced PowerShell, UI, mobile support, and AI alerts.

Users want improved interface, customization, integration, and support for Tenable Vulnerability Management, with clearer licensing and automation features.

A better command line interface for Microsoft Configuration Manager would be an additional feature I would to see in the future to make it closer to a perfect score.

Jakub J

Systems Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Improvements are needed for servers. Servers are still not getting it properly, so we could add the servers in Microsoft Configuration Manager for things such as OS deployment and Autopilot as well.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy.

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.

Rishabh-Khanna

Technical Lead at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Setup Cost

Microsoft Configuration Manager pricing is high but offers comprehensive features, with value seen mainly for larger infrastructures.

Tenable Vulnerability Management is pricey but valued for features, with users desiring flexible, cost-effective pricing models.

The setup cost is considered sufficient.

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

The pricing for Microsoft Configuration Manager is okay for me.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Valuable Features

Microsoft Configuration Manager offers scalable endpoint management, efficient deployment, vulnerability fixes, and integration, crucial for enterprises with remote operations.

Tenable Vulnerability Management offers comprehensive scanning and integration with features enhancing usability, scalability, and security compliance support.

The most valuable features I find in Microsoft Configuration Manager are mostly patching, deploying software, deploying images, and running custom scripts.

Jakub J

Systems Architect at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part.

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The product valuable for deployment recovery.

For more quotes and insights, download the Microsoft Configuration Manager report

IT Infrastructure Coordinator at NSW Government

Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment.

For more quotes and insights, download the Tenable Vulnerability Management report

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.

reviewer2721399

SOC Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Configuration Man...

Ranking in Patch Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Distribution (1st), Server Monitoring (7th), Configuration Management (3rd)

Tenable Vulnerability Manag...

Ranking in Patch Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (8th), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Configuration Manager is 8.6%, down from 15.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Patch Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Configuration Manager	8.6%
Tenable Vulnerability Management	1.5%
Other	89.9%

Patch Management

Featured Reviews

Have effectively deployed patches and applications while integrating with cloud solutions

Expert at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The features I find most valuable in Microsoft Configuration Manager are replication and scripting. If I want to get a fetch report for anything, such as hardware-related issues or group policy-related issues, I need to fetch the report by using SCCM's scripting language and remediation part. The inventory collection features of Microsoft Configuration Manager are good because we always prefer the inventory. We do it by using the script language. We use remote management capabilities in Microsoft Configuration Manager. Remote management capabilities are useful if the user is not providing access; we can use the backend users to update the group policy and sync the devices. These are the main features we require.

Read full review

Have maintained accurate vulnerability scans and gained actionable remediation insights across thousands of servers

Windows Security Patching Operation III (Cyber Operations) at CBTS

Tenable Vulnerability Management agents are very lightweight, and the results we get are very accurate. The solutions they provide to us, assuming if one vulnerability exists, there will be a solution. The resolution they give us in wording will be the best solution. The exploit rates and the reports we get provide a lot of information, making it very easy for us to verify.The main benefit of integration with Tenable Vulnerability Management is that there will be no lack of missing vulnerabilities when it comes to the patching environment. That is one of the key aspects of why we have integrated Tenable to our patching tools. It has a vast capacity of pushing the data to our tools due to its capability and compatibility. That is also one of the reasons why we are using Tenable Vulnerability Management.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	64

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

How does Ansible compare to Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM)?

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager takes knowledge and research to properly configure. The length of time that the set up will take depends on the kind of technical architecture that your org...

How to choose between ManageEngine Desktop Central and Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (formerly SCCM)?

ManageEngine Desktop Central is very easy to set up, is scalable, stable, and also has very good patch management. What I like most about ManageEngine is that I can log on to every PC very easily a...

What do you like most about SCCM?

One of the standout features of SCCM is its application management capabilities. It allows us to create packages efficiently and deploy them to specific groups within our network. This streamlined ...

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation t...

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Vulnerability Management is not very effective for real-time risk prioritization for our organization's security strategy. It is only used for scheduled tasks, not for real-time execution.W...

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 5% of the time

BigFix vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

PDQ Deploy vs Microsoft Configuration Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Configuration Manager Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Configuration Manager

Download Microsoft Configuration Manager product report

Tenable Vulnerability Management

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager, System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM ), Microsoft SMS

Tenable.io

Overview

Microsoft Configuration Manager streamlines IT management with features such as software deployment, patch management, and automation, centralizing operations for Windows environments. Integration with Microsoft products allows efficient oversight of workstations and servers.

Microsoft Configuration Manager provides comprehensive IT management, offering software deployment, patch management, and application pushing. Automation reduces manual tasks, ensuring consistency across systems. Centralized management enables standardized OS deployments, application updates, and configuration integrity. Integration with Microsoft products facilitates seamless operations, while hardware and software inventory, compliance reporting, and remote control functions enhance IT management. Users seek improvements in application deployment for those without deep scripting knowledge and desire better WSUS control, PowerShell and Intune integration, Linux compatibility, and user interface enhancements. Performance improvements are requested for remote user management and third-party application support.

What features enhance Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Software Deployment: Efficiently distribute software across large networks.
Patch Management: Automate and streamline update processes for security and functionality.
Automation Capabilities: Reduce manual effort and enhance consistency in IT tasks.
Centralized Management: Standardize OS deployments and application updates.
Integration with Microsoft Products: Seamless operation with existing Microsoft infrastructure.
Hardware and Software Inventory: Comprehensive tracking for assets and resources.
Compliance Reporting: Ensure compliance with internal and external standards.
Remote Control Functions: Enhance support and troubleshooting capabilities.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Microsoft Configuration Manager?

Decreased Manual Work: Automation reduces time spent on repetitive tasks.
Enhanced Security: Automated patch management keeps systems secure.
Consistent Configurations: Centralized updates ensure uniformity across systems.
Improved Integration: Seamless operation within Microsoft ecosystems boosts productivity.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed inventory and reporting tools aid in strategic planning.
Streamlined Support: Remote capabilities improve IT support and user satisfaction.

Microsoft Configuration Manager is widely implemented in organizations to manage Windows workstations and servers. It is essential for deploying operating systems and applications, managing software updates, and conducting hardware and software inventories. The tool is crucial for endpoint and configuration management, ensuring compliance, and automating processes like patching and vulnerability management. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and education rely on Microsoft Configuration Manager to keep systems secure and operational, adapting it to address their specific needs and challenges in maintaining diversified IT environments.

Microsoft

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad

Global Payments AU/NZ

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management