Microsoft App-V vs Numecent Cloudpager comparison

Microsoft and Numecent are both solutions in the Application Virtualization category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4, while Numecent is ranked #5. Microsoft holds a 21.9% mindshare in AV, compared to Numecent’s 15.1% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Numecent users who would recommend it.

Microsoft App-V

Read 9 Microsoft App-V reviews

1,382 Views
1,382 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Numecent Cloudpager

Read 1 Numecent Cloudpager review

674 Views
674 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft App-V

Numecent Cloudpager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 12, 2025

Microsoft App-V and Numecent Cloudpager are both application virtualization solutions. Numecent Cloudpager has the upper hand with its advanced features and cloud-based management, making it a worthwhile choice for those prioritizing cutting-edge technology despite its higher costs.

Features: Microsoft App-V offers seamless application deployment, management capabilities, and excellent integration with Windows environments. Numecent Cloudpager provides fast application streaming, cloud-based management, and enhanced flexibility and efficiency through advanced cloud capabilities. The choice between them hinges on Cloudpager's leading cloud features contrasted with App-V's strong Windows integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft App-V is noted for its straightforward deployment within Windows using familiar support channels. Numecent Cloudpager focuses on cloud-centric rapid and scalable deployments with robust customer support. Cloudpager's dependency on cloud integration contrasts with App-V's simplified Windows compatibility.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft App-V provides a cost-effective setup with predictable ROI through integration with existing Microsoft tools. Numecent Cloudpager requires a higher initial investment yet offers potentially greater ROI due to its superior cloud functionalities. App-V's affordability and cost predictability are vital for budget-aware organizations compared to Cloudpager's premium investment.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Virtualization Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft App-V

Ranking in Application Virtualization

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Numecent Cloudpager

Ranking in Application Virtualization

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Virtualization category, the mindshare of Microsoft App-V is 21.9%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Numecent Cloudpager is 15.1%, up from 12.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Virtualization Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft App-V	21.9%
Numecent Cloudpager	15.1%
Other	63.0%

Application Virtualization

Featured Reviews

Francois Gotti

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at IQEQ

Streaming has impressed but integration and support require improvement

The problem with Microsoft App-V is that there is no choice since Microsoft has decided to stop it, and we are searching for alternatives. Microsoft App-V needs to evolve, possibly with better integration with other solutions, particularly since we use Citrix and want to integrate App-V packages more efficiently. The management of packages should be easier, possibly through a web console for visibility in versioning, and options to convert packages when changing technologies. Many companies avoid using tools like Admin Studio due to high costs. Additionally, Microsoft App-V has been slow, and users experience delays when launching applications, which presents significant challenges.

Read full review

it_user749919

Application Packager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions

Isolation layering Driver virtualisation Licence management Usage tracking Plugin integration Being able to deploy applications which use drivers has allowed us to virtualise more applications than with other solutions. Self-service Portal. More than eight years. No. No. No, it scales very…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very easy to use from an administration point of view."

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft App-V that I found is the possibility to bring old software back to life and publish it for users to do their jobs using those applications."

"From my experience with Microsoft App-V, the feature I liked the most is the streaming."

"It is easy to scale. You can quickly deploy additional instances. Rollbacks are easy because there is an automatic backup every hour. Deploying the application is straightforward and efficient."

"The most interesting and powerful feature for us is the fact that we can upgrade any kind of app instantly."

"We can deploy applications incredibly fast."

"I appreciate the process of being able to change or review my answers."

"I would recommend Microsoft App-V for its simplicity and efficiency."

More Microsoft App-V pros

"Driver virtualisation"

Cons

"If it were possible to integrate App-V with a cybersecurity solution then we could implement a documentation registry, which would be useful."

"Regarding improvements in Microsoft App-V, I would appreciate seeing the successor, MSIX, work better, as nothing is going to be implemented anymore since it is end of life by the end of the year."

"Microsoft App-V has been slow, and users experience delays when launching applications, which presents significant challenges."

"There is definitely room for improvement with Microsoft App-V, especially in terms of enhancing troubleshooting resources and user guidance."

"The process was streamlined but didn't make our work simple. We encountered an issue with the person responsible for designing the website."

"The downside is that Microsoft bought this product and they are going to discontinue it in 2026. This is worrisome for us."

"The reporting features could be improved."

"Microsoft App-V is more suited for legacy software usage, and trying to make it work in that context usually feels tricky and unreliable."

"Self-service Portal."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of this product is competitive."

"Clients do not pay licensing fees."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

29%

Energy/Utilities Company

16%

University

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft App-V?

Regarding pricing, I believe flexibility would help retain customers. Costs could be more adaptable to meet varying budgets.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft App-V?

There is definitely room for improvement with Microsoft App-V, especially in terms of enhancing troubleshooting resources and user guidance.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft App-V?

I have been using Microsoft App-V for quite some time, and I can describe my use cases, which include various applications that enhance productivity.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Microsoft App-V

Compared 27% of the time

Parallels Remote Application Server (RAS) vs Microsoft App-V

Compared 15% of the time

More Microsoft App-V Competitors

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs Numecent Cloudpager

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Virtual Server vs Numecent Cloudpager

Compared 9% of the time

More Numecent Cloudpager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft App-V

October 2025

Download Microsoft App-V product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

October 2025

Download Numecent Cloudpager product report

Also Known As

App-V, MS App-V

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Application Virtualization (App-V) enables you to make applications available to end users without installing the applications directly on end user computers. App-V transforms applications into centrally managed services that are never installed and don't conflict with other applications.

Microsoft

Numecent Cloudpager offers a comprehensive cloud management experience tailored for seamless application delivery, improving operational efficiency and resource utilization.

Numecent Cloudpager streamlines application management, reducing deployment time and enhancing security. It integrates seamlessly, making it a preferred choice for businesses aiming to optimize their cloud strategies. It supports rapid deployment across platforms, ensuring flexibility and scalability while maintaining data integrity and compliance. Its architecture caters to dynamic workloads and varying enterprise requirements, standing out for its adaptability and reliability.

What are the key features of Numecent Cloudpager?

Seamless Application Delivery: Facilitates efficient application provisioning without traditional installation barriers.
Robust Security: Incorporates enterprise-grade security protocols to safeguard data.
Scalability: Supports expanding business needs with elastic resource allocation.
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Ensures wide-ranging compatibility across different operating systems.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Cost-Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary overheads by optimizing resource allocation.
Time Savings: Streamlines operations, allowing quick implementation and minimizing downtime.
Enhanced Productivity: Frees up IT resources for strategic tasks by automating repetitive processes.
Improved Compliance: Assists in adhering to industry regulations with secure and traceable operations.

In the financial sector, Numecent Cloudpager simplifies complex data handling and ensures rapid deployment, crucial for timely transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it supports secure patient data applications, maintaining compliance with healthcare regulations. Retailers benefit from agile deployment, enhancing customer experiences with fast-paced initiatives.

Numecent

Sample Customers

The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), GDDKiA, P&V, Etisalat Lanka, Hellenic Petroleum

Kingston University London, Construction Executive, Ascentech K.K, Fast Company, Geekout365

Buyer's Guide

Application Virtualization

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, Microsoft, Parallels and others in Application Virtualization. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Application Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.