"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise supports a lot of technologies. The existing performance testing that this tool is capable of is good. The protocols that are available are widely varied when compared to other performance testing tools."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is recording and replaying, and the fact that there are multiple options available to do this."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters."
"The user interface is fine."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Is very user-friendly."
"I think the number one feature everybody likes is the capability to easily generate virtual users as well as the reporting."
"We have a centralized delivery team and we are able to meet enterprise requirements, which include different types of protocols that are involved, including scripting. The technology supports that and enables us to have a wider range of testing. Enterprise-level testing is something that we are satisfied with."
"A good monitoring tool, simple to script and easy to configure."
"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."
"I believe the data that demonstrates the automated correlations should be corrected."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise needs to add more features for Citrix performance-based applications testing. This was one of the challenges we observed. Additionally, we experienced some APIs challenges."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's reporting should be quicker, easier, and more flexible."
"It would be good if we could look forward at the future technology needs we have. I would like to see Micro Focus provide more customer awareness around how LoadRunner can fulfill requirements with Big Data use cases, for example, where you do performance testing at the scale of data lakes... when it comes to technologies our company has yet to adopt, I would like to see an indication from Micro Focus of how one does performance testing and what kinds of challenges can we foresee. Those kinds of studies would really help us."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"The installation has not been straightforward, and we have had so many problems. We have had to re-install, try to install on a different machine, etc. We have not been able to launch the LRE server itself yet."
"If you have a large amount of data, the solution can struggle."
More Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 9 reviews while Micro Focus Silk Performer is ranked 8th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review. Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 7.2, while Micro Focus Silk Performer is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Full geographical coverage, integrates well with monitoring tools, granular project inspection capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Silk Performer writes "Scripting and basic test executions are good features; configuring the workload for tests is easy". Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Micro Focus Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional.
See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
