Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mezmo vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Mezmo and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Mezmo is ranked #80, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.7. Mezmo holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 520 Views
  • 270 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Splunk Observability Cloud
Read 57 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews
  • 5,348 Views
  • 3,262 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Mezmo compete in the observability space, focusing on data analytics and monitoring. Splunk Observability Cloud leads in feature richness and comprehensive integration, making it suitable for complex environments, while Mezmo offers cost-effectiveness without sacrificing essential functionalities.

Features:Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced analytics capabilities, real-time monitoring, and seamless third-party integrations, supporting diverse environments with high scalability and flexibility. Mezmo focuses on streamlined log management, intuitive alerting systems, and an efficient feature set catering to straightforward observability needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Splunk Observability Cloud offers a comprehensive deployment model with excellent documentation and community support, although it can be complex for first-time deployers. Mezmo offers a simpler deployment process with accessible customer service, enhancing the experience for those new to observability tools.

Pricing and ROI:Splunk Observability Cloud involves a higher setup cost justified by its rich feature set and extensive capabilities, delivering substantial ROI in larger deployments. Mezmo presents a cost-effective setup with significant ROI potential, ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises seeking budget-friendly solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
80th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (52nd), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)
Splunk Observability Cloud
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
8th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (7th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

TO
It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities
Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.
Read full review
Lakshmi Padaga - PeerSpot reviewer
Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection
Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"Dashboards help the application support teams to have a quick look at how their systems are running. It helps other teams as well."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is its ability to get information about all of the security measurements in my environment."
"Overall, I would recommend Splunk to anyone seeking a monitoring solution, thanks to its extensive capabilities and features."
"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."
"The most valuable features are troubleshooting and optimizing application performance."
"It's a very easy-to-use solution."
"The best features in Splunk Observability Cloud are the metrics; I can see any logs or anything related to the server or services we want to monitor, and the metrics are a good function."
"The solution overall is very valuable for me."
More Splunk Observability Cloud pros
 

Cons

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."
"In Splunk Observability Cloud, I notice room for improvement in synthetic monitoring. It does not provide output based on server names."
"Splunk isn't an ideal tool for application performance management due to the extensive setup required."
"Splunk could be better integrated with configuration manager solutions so we can automatically resolve issues without human interference."
"Support from Splunk is not very helpful because Splunk doesn't have a dedicated APM; they only have one APM engineer in Korea."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's data analytics can be improved by including suggestions for various types of continuous monitoring."
"The initial setup of Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM) was easy. The solution is deployed on-premises."
"There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available. We sometimes encountered issues in setting up alerts."
More Splunk Observability Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."
"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."
"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."
"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."
"The solution's pricing is costly."
"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."
"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."
More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SignalFx?
The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SignalFx?
Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SignalFx?
The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 47% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 32% of the time
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo Logo
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo
Compared 21% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 8% of the time
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 7% of the time
Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Mezmo
July 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Observability Cloud
July 2025
Splunk Observability Cloud reportDownload Splunk Observability Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

LogDNA
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring
 

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?
  • Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
  • Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
  • Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
  • Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
  • Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
  • Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.
Why consider this for ROI?
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
  • Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
  • Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
  • Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
July 2025
Free Report: Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.