Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mezmo vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Mezmo and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Mezmo is ranked #89, while Splunk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.7. Mezmo holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 220 Views
  • 33 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Splunk Observability Cloud
Read 56 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews
  • 2,960 Views
  • 1,374 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Mezmo compete in the observability space, focusing on data analytics and monitoring. Splunk Observability Cloud leads in feature richness and comprehensive integration, making it suitable for complex environments, while Mezmo offers cost-effectiveness without sacrificing essential functionalities.

Features:Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced analytics capabilities, real-time monitoring, and seamless third-party integrations, supporting diverse environments with high scalability and flexibility. Mezmo focuses on streamlined log management, intuitive alerting systems, and an efficient feature set catering to straightforward observability needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Splunk Observability Cloud offers a comprehensive deployment model with excellent documentation and community support, although it can be complex for first-time deployers. Mezmo offers a simpler deployment process with accessible customer service, enhancing the experience for those new to observability tools.

Pricing and ROI:Splunk Observability Cloud involves a higher setup cost justified by its rich feature set and extensive capabilities, delivering substantial ROI in larger deployments. Mezmo presents a cost-effective setup with significant ROI potential, ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises seeking budget-friendly solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
89th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (55th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)
Splunk Observability Cloud
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
56
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (8th), Container Management (7th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

TO
It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities
Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.
Read full review
Lakshmi Padaga - PeerSpot reviewer
Collaborates performance metrics with log data to pinpoint the exact cause of issues and offers error detection
Splunk APM is a robust tool with many capabilities. There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience. For Splunk APM, there could be simplified navigation, like streamlining the user interface to make navigation more intuitive for our users, especially those new to APM, which can enhance usability. We can provide more customization options for dashboards and visualizations to help users tailor the platform to their specific needs. There could be more integration capabilities with a wider range of third-party tools and platforms would also be beneficial. By focusing on these areas, Splunk APM can enhance its value proposition, improve user satisfaction, and better meet the evolving needs of organizations monitoring their application performance.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"The solution's service map feature allows us to have a holistic overview and to see quickly where the issues are."
"The Add data feature lets you gather any type of log and easily analyze it."
"The ability to create custom dashboards is one of the best features and that's typically why most people deploy Splunk. Users can create dashboards for just about anything."
"The most valuable features are troubleshooting and optimizing application performance."
"I have primarily used it to go back into the past and understand why something happened. It provides enough information to do research and figure things out."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to customize dashboards based on my queries or any other customization I may need."
"The most valuable feature in this solution is the log searching."
"It's beneficial for monitoring performance and infrastructure, especially when deploying applications with multiple versions with Git."
More Splunk Observability Cloud pros
 

Cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"The solution should have more sensors regarding fiber intelligence for security measures."
"This solution is difficult to configure and the instructions are complex."
"The deployment can be quite complex."
"The monitoring of workloads when using SignalFx could be improved."
"It is essential for the monitoring tool to deliver quick response times when generating analytical reports, instead of prolonged delays."
"The UI enhancements could be a way to improve the solution in the future."
"A wide variety of logging makes log onboarding difficult."
"There are some predefined metrics.......we may want to create customized metrics."
More Splunk Observability Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I would rate the price of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring as an eight out of ten, with ten being the most expensive."
"It is expensive."
"The solution's pricing is costly."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."
"Splunk APM is a very cost-efficient solution."
"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."
"Splunk has been fairly expensive, but it has been predictable."
"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."
More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
15%
Retailer
7%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SignalFx?
The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SignalFx?
Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SignalFx?
The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 50% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 27% of the time
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo Logo
Grafana Loki vs Mezmo
Compared 23% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 13% of the time
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 9% of the time
SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 4% of the time
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cribl vs. Mezmo
May 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Observability Cloud
May 2025
Splunk Observability Cloud reportDownload Splunk Observability Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

LogDNA
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring
 

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?
  • Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
  • Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
  • Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
  • Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
  • Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
  • Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.
Why consider this for ROI?
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
  • Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
  • Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
  • Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
June 2025
Free Report: Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Mezmo vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.