Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mezmo vs Microsoft Purview Audit comparison

Mezmo and Microsoft are both solutions in the Log Management category. Mezmo is ranked #50, while Microsoft is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.0. Mezmo holds a 0.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Microsoft’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Mezmo
Read 2 Mezmo reviews
  • 673 Views
  • 444 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Purview Audit
Read 3 Microsoft Purview Audit reviews
  • 1,007 Views
  • 665 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Mezmo and Microsoft Purview Audit compete in the technical solutions market. Mezmo is favorable in pricing and customer support, while Microsoft Purview Audit leads in feature richness.

Features: Mezmo offers efficient data processing with robust integration and analysis tools. Microsoft Purview Audit provides advanced compliance features, comprehensive audit trails, and detailed reporting.

Room for Improvement: Mezmo could enhance customization options, user guidance, and adaptability. Microsoft Purview Audit could improve scalability, intuitive navigation, and user experience smoothness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mezmo is recognized for its straightforward deployment and responsive support. Microsoft Purview Audit involves a complex setup but benefits from detailed supporting documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Mezmo attracts with a lower initial setup cost and favorable ROI for budget-conscious buyers. Microsoft Purview Audit has a higher setup cost, seen as justified by its comprehensive features and long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo
Ranking in Log Management
50th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (75th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)
Microsoft Purview Audit
Ranking in Log Management
36th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (31st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Audit is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Purview Audit0.5%
Mezmo0.3%
Other99.2%
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

TO
It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities
Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.
Read full review
Matthew Hoerig - PeerSpot reviewer
Audit function refines log retrieval and drives application assessments with evolving features
From a service assessment and authorization process perspective, when conducting an assessment on an application or system, we use controls essentially equivalent to the NIST 800-53 framework. This includes examining audit logs, data quality, and various KPIs required for log configuration. It factors into our application assessments. When producing documentation packages for application or system authorization, audit logging and monitoring are crucial parts of the assessment process. The evidence we gather includes screenshots and outputs from these tools and capabilities. For Microsoft Purview Audit specifically, we provide examples of audit function configuration and log output details, which are incorporated into our evidence documents.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution."
"The platform has significantly enhanced our operational insight into the overall Microsoft 365 environment."
"The overall user experience with Microsoft Purview Audit is of higher quality than when it was branded as Compliance Center, and Microsoft consistently updates and evolves functionalities and the overall experience."
 

Cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
"We are still in the early stages of leveraging Microsoft Purview Audit. Currently, it's primarily used for the audit function."
"Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features."
"We do have a Denial of Access happening."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Audit?
I'm not aware of the pricing of licensing terms.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Audit?
Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Audit?
We utilize Microsoft Purview Audit for monitoring security and compliance aspects.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo Logo
Datadog vs Mezmo
Compared 41% of the time
Cribl vs Mezmo Logo
Cribl vs Mezmo
Compared 37% of the time
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Mezmo Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs Mezmo
Compared 22% of the time
More Mezmo Competitors
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 9% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 9% of the time
Sumo Logic Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Sumo Logic Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 9% of the time
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 9% of the time
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 8% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Audit Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cribl vs. Mezmo
September 2025
Mezmo reportDownload Mezmo product report
Buyer's Guide
Log Management
October 2025
Microsoft Purview Audit reportDownload Microsoft Purview Audit product report
 

Also Known As

LogDNA
No data available
 

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

The unified auditing functionality in Microsoft 365 provides organizations with visibility into many types of audited activities across many different services in Microsoft 365. Advanced Audit helps organizations to conduct forensic and compliance investigations by increasing audit log retention required to conduct an investigation, providing access to crucial events that help determine scope of compromise, and faster access to Office 365 Management Activity API.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Mezmo vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
September 2025
Free Report: Mezmo vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. Microsoft Purview Audit and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Mezmo vs. Microsoft Purview Audit report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.