Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mend.io vs Veracode comparison

Mend.io and Veracode are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Mend.io is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.3, while Veracode is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Mend.io holds a 3.6% mindshare in AS, compared to Veracode’s 9.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Mend.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Veracode users who would recommend it.
Mend.io
Read 31 Mend.io reviews
  • 4,825 Views
  • 3,013 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Veracode
Read 201 Veracode reviews
  • 14,085 Views
  • 9,138 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Veracode and Mend.io compete in the application security testing market. Mend.io appears to have an edge in open-source security management and pricing flexibility.

Features: Veracode distinguishes itself with comprehensive static and dynamic application security testing and ease of integration across various software development lifecycles. It provides detailed vulnerability management insights and robust support for multiple programming languages. Mend.io, on the other hand, shines with robust support for open-source security and flexibility in analyzing third-party components. It offers detailed licensing reports and excels in integration capabilities across CI/CD frameworks.

Room for Improvement: For Veracode, improving user interface complexity, reducing false positives, and expanding language support could enhance user experience. There's also a need for faster scanning speeds for larger applications. Mend.io could benefit from a more responsive user interface and added support for niche package managers. Enhancing automation to reduce manual intervention in remediation processes would also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veracode offers diverse deployment models, including public and private cloud options and on-premises solutions. Its technical support is rated highly for depth of knowledge and prompt resolutions. Mend.io, primarily cloud-based, integrates smoothly within developer workflows and is vouched for good customer service, despite occasional support response delays.

Pricing and ROI: Veracode is noted for its higher cost, which is justified by its extensive features and security assurance benefits. It provides substantial ROI through reduced vulnerabilities and operational efficiencies. Mend.io offers competitive pricing and flexible licensing, catering to both startups and enterprises. It is valued for its open-source management focus, ensuring a favorable return on investment.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Mend.io vs. Veracode Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Mend.io vs. Veracode
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
Mend.io boosts ROI by automating vulnerability management, enabling faster delivery, cost savings, and improved security insights for organizations.
Sentiment score
6.8
Veracode improved code quality, security, and efficiency, leading to cost savings, faster releases, and enhanced operational benefits for organizations.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
The scanners of Veracode bring status of the weaknesses in the current infrastructure. It scans and provides reports regarding the servers, the network, and the applications running on those servers.
Regarding price, the evaluation should focus on how efficiently they will recover their investment, considering the time saved through the use of Veracode Fix, for example, and the ability to fix code at dev time compared to the problems faced when fixing after the product is already deployed.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
AM
reviewer2703864 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Mend.io's customer service excels with quick, knowledgeable support, proactive staff, and effective communication, ideal for large organizations.
Sentiment score
7.3
Veracode provides effective, prompt support with knowledgeable staff, though response times and coordination occasionally need improvement.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
Access to the engineering team is crucial for faster feedback on the product fix process.
They are very responsive and quick to help with queries within our scope.
They respond very quickly since security is something critical.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
SR
Kv Rao - PeerSpot reviewer
AM
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Mend.io effectively scales for large projects, integrates with workflows, and supports CI/CD, enhancing security and collaboration.
Sentiment score
7.5
Veracode is scalable and effective for large user volumes, though some note potential scaling costs and manageable packaging challenges.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
Cloud solutions are easier to scale than on-premise solutions.
It has a good capacity to scale effectively.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Mend.io offers reliable performance, seamless integration, quick issue resolution, and supports diverse needs with minimal downtime and intuitive interface.
Sentiment score
7.9
Users find Veracode stable and reliable, with occasional well-communicated maintenance and improved stability, despite some glitches and false positives.
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
If the Veracode server is down, we experience many issues during the scan.
It's not that easy to onboard, but once they have been onboarded on the platform, and the pipeline configured alongside the product configured, it works effectively.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
BP
reviewer2703864 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Mend.io requires UI and reporting enhancements, wider language support, improved scanning, automation, and cost-effective pricing for better user experience.
Veracode faces criticism for false positives, outdated UI, slow scans, high costs, and poor support for new technologies.
The actual challenge is how easy it is to integrate it in the early phase of the software development life cycle.
The organization decided to consolidate tools and chose Snyk since it provides multiple functionalities in one solution.
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
If it could be integrated directly with code repositories such as Bitbucket or GitHub, without the need to create a pipeline to upload and decode code, it would simplify the code scan process significantly.
We had issues with scanning large applications. Scanning took a lot of time, so we kept it outside the DevOps pipeline to avoid delaying deployments.
A nice addition would be if it could be extended for scenarios with custom cleansers.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
SR
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
HS
BP
reviewer2700198 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Setup Cost

Mend.io offers a competitive yearly pricing model based on developer count, appealing for enterprises but pricey for startups.
Veracode's high pricing suits large enterprises but is challenging for smaller businesses, with negotiable terms for optimal value.
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
It's not the most expensive solution.
If there's a security gap, you'll never know the cost or effect.
Pricing-wise, I find it a bit expensive because it's based on the number of users requesting access to Veracode.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
AM
HS
BP
 

Valuable Features

Mend.io streamlines vulnerability management with automation, integration, and comprehensive tools for tracking and securing open-source dependencies.
Veracode integrates with CI/CD pipelines, offering fast scans, low false positives, and tools for efficient vulnerability management and compliance.
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
It handles Application Security, performing SCA SAST and container scanning.
For more quotes and insights, download the Mend.io report
It offers confidence by preventing exposure to vulnerabilities and helps ensure that we are not deploying vulnerable code into production.
The best features in Veracode include static analysis and the early detection of vulnerable libraries; it integrates with tools such as Jenkins.
It fixes issues directly in the IDE while you're doing it.
For more quotes and insights, download the Veracode report
meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
SR
Kv Rao - PeerSpot reviewer
HS
reviewer2700198 - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Mend.io
Ranking in Application Security Tools
17th
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
7th
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Software Supply Chain Security (1st)
Veracode
Ranking in Application Security Tools
2nd
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
3rd
Ranking in Static Code Analysis
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
201
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (2nd), Container Security (8th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Mend.io is 3.6%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veracode is 9.0%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

meetharoon - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables smooth management of vulnerabilities and promotes a shift towards a culture of security
We have witnessed Mend.io for its high stability, consistently living up to our expectations in terms of performance and reliability. Our developers have reported very few issues and almost minimal to zero downtime, which is a critical factor for our organization to rely on Mend SCA to secure our applications. We didn't experience any major issues in the stability of the product. This level of dependability is crucial for our hundreds of development teams that need to maintain continuous integration and deployment processes without interruptions. We realize the solution's architecture is designed to support a wide range of use cases, making it suitable for organizations of varying sizes and complexities. As a SaaS (Software as a Service) offering, Mend.io eliminates the need for physical server management, which further contributes to its stability. Users can access the platform without worrying about hardware failures or maintenance issues that can affect on-premises solutions. Moreover, Mend.io's integration capabilities with existing workflows—including IDEs, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines—enhance its stability by providing a seamless user experience. This integration allows teams to incorporate security scanning into their development processes without significant disruptions, which is often a challenge with less stable solutions. Feedback from our developers and architects highlights the tool's effectiveness in reducing open-source software vulnerabilities while maintaining a streamlined development lifecycle. Our organization have experienced improved code quality and faster incident response times as a result of using Mend.io. The platform's intuitive dashboard and management views are also praised by our developers for their usability, contributing to a positive user experience. In short, Mend.io stands out as a dependable and reliable solution in the realm of software composition analysis. Its high stability, combined with robust integration capabilities and user-friendly features, makes it an excellent choice for organizations seeking to enhance their security posture while minimizing operational disruptions.
Read full review
Sajal Sharma - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers shift-left security strategy and helps us with the latest security configurations, OWASP standards, and SAST standards
It's robustness is the main benefit to the organization. As it gets upgraded with time, it also improves the coverage – security configuration coverages and vulnerability coverages. It also updates itself with the latest known vulnerabilities that are uploaded to the NVD, OWASP, or other databases. So it gets upgraded itself with that. And so with each upgrade, it gets better and better. The solution offers the ability to prevent vulnerable code from going into production. It provides us with a report containing multiple remediations and mitigations for each vulnerability. For example, if it finds a cross-site scripting vulnerability, it will also include references like CWE and CVE records, instructions on how to fix it, and the specific line of code or module where the vulnerability is present. This helps us fix the issues accordingly. I'm a penetration tester and DevSecOps engineer. I evaluate the findings, mark false positives, and manually exploit vulnerabilities if they exist. If we need further clarification, we raise a ticket with the Veracode team and get consultancy from them. We are a software development team. If we find a vulnerability, I exploit it and come back with the best possible mitigation, and the dev team fixes it. If we use Veracode Fix, it might use third-party implementations or make changes we aren't aware of. We need to be very aware of what our application is using internally. It should be known to us. As per my experience, the solution's policy reporting ensures compliance with industry standards. It comes with multiple features. I get the most out of it, and it's good. The solution provides visibility into application status at every phase of development. Like static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition, and manual penetration tests - throughout the SDLC We have a pipeline that I maintain. I use the Veracode API account and have integrated it with AWS and our Jenkins pipeline. We use Snyk for SCA and Veracode for SAST scanning. At the earliest stage of the build, the SAST scan runs along with the JS and PHP files. It provides us with reports, which are then handed over to the other tools we depend on. If I validate the report or check the Veracode dashboard and find vulnerabilities, I mark them as false positives or existing issues. We work on multiple projects, but the one I'm handling these days only uses Veracode for SAST. It's been about one and a half years since I've been working with Veracode and this project. It is quite impressive. There are some things Veracode cannot find, like code obfuscations inside the code and some insecure randoms. Sometimes, it misses those flaws. But overall, if I compare it with other tools, it is better. I will definitely recommend others to use this tool. We run the scan before each deployment. If the dev team builds a new module or something, we scan it along with all the files. If we find anything, we get it fixed. That's how it works. Veracode is quite important to the organization's shift-left security strategy because we make a scan for each deployment. Sometimes, if I think we need to perform a shift-left, I just make a scan before deployment and check for any misconfiguration or vulnerability in the code.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?
Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...
See all answers
How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?
We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...
See all answers
What do you like most about Mend.io?
The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulner...
See all answers
Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?
SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...
See all answers
What do you like most about Veracode?
The SAST and DAST modules are great.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veracode?
The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Mend.io Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Mend.io
Compared 22% of the time
Black Duck vs Mend.io Logo
Black Duck vs Mend.io
Compared 12% of the time
Snyk vs Mend.io Logo
Snyk vs Mend.io
Compared 9% of the time
GitHub Dependabot vs Mend.io Logo
GitHub Dependabot vs Mend.io
Compared 7% of the time
JFrog Xray vs Mend.io Logo
JFrog Xray vs Mend.io
Compared 7% of the time
More Mend.io Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Veracode Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Veracode
Compared 18% of the time
Checkmarx One vs Veracode Logo
Checkmarx One vs Veracode
Compared 10% of the time
GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode Logo
GitHub Advanced Security vs Veracode
Compared 7% of the time
OpenText Core Application Security vs Veracode Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs Veracode
Compared 4% of the time
Black Duck vs Veracode Logo
Black Duck vs Veracode
Compared 3% of the time
More Veracode Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mend.io
June 2025
Mend.io reportDownload Mend.io product report
Buyer's Guide
Veracode
June 2025
Veracode reportDownload Veracode product report
 

Also Known As

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST
Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect
 

Overview

Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.

Mend.io Features

Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Vulnerability analysis
  • Automated remediation
  • Seamless integration
  • Business prioritization
  • Limitless scalability
  • Intuitive interface
  • Language support
  • Integration
  • Continuous monitoring
  • Remediation suggestions
  • Customization

Mend.io Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • Easy to use: The Mend.io platform is very user-friendly and easy to set up.
  • Third-party libraries: The solution eases the process of keeping track of all the used third-party dependencies within a product. It not only scans for the pure occurrence (also transitively) but also takes care of licenses and vulnerabilities.
  • Static code analysis: With Mend.io’s static code analysis, you can quickly identify security weaknesses in custom code across desktop, web, and mobile applications.
  • Broad support: Mend.io provides 27 different programming languages and various programming frameworks.
  • Easy integration: Mend.io makes integration very easy with existing DevOps environments and CI/CD pipelines so developers don’t need to manually configure or trigger the scan.
  • Ultra-fast scanning engine: The solution’s scanning engine generates results up to ten times faster than legacy SAST solutions.
  • Unified developer experience: Mend.io has a unified developer experience inside the code repository that shows side-by-side security alerts and remediation suggestions for custom code and open-source code.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.

Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”

PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”

An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”

Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."

Mend.io

Veracode is a leading provider of application security solutions, offering tools to identify, mitigate, and prevent vulnerabilities across the software development lifecycle. Its cloud-based platform integrates security into DevOps workflows, helping organizations ensure that their code remains secure and compliant with industry standards.

Veracode supports multiple application security testing types, including static analysis (SAST), dynamic analysis (DAST), software composition analysis (SCA), and manual penetration testing. These tools are designed to help developers detect vulnerabilities early in development while maintaining speed in deployment. Veracode also emphasizes scalability, offering features for enterprises that manage a large number of applications across different teams. Its robust reporting and analytics capabilities allow organizations to continuously monitor their security posture and track progress toward remediation.

What are the key features of Veracode?

  • Static Analysis (SAST) - Scans source code for vulnerabilities before deployment.
  • Dynamic Analysis (DAST) - Examines applications in a running state to detect flaws in real-time.
  • Software Composition Analysis (SCA) - Identifies risks in open-source libraries and third-party components.
  • Manual Penetration Testing - Offers expert analysis for more complex vulnerabilities.
  • Integrations with DevOps tools - Seamlessly integrates with CI/CD pipelines for automated security checks.

What benefits should users consider in Veracode reviews?

  • Early detection of vulnerabilities - Helps developers fix security issues early in the development process.
  • Scalability - Supports organizations with large-scale application portfolios.
  • Compliance support - Ensures applications meet various security standards and regulations.
  • Developer training - Provides tools for educating developers on secure coding practices.
  • Comprehensive reporting - Offers detailed reports that track remediation and risk trends.

Veracode is widely adopted in industries like finance, healthcare, and government, where compliance and security are critical. It helps these organizations maintain strict security standards while enabling rapid development through its integration with Agile and DevOps methodologies.


Veracode helps businesses secure their applications efficiently, ensuring they can deliver safe and compliant software at scale.

Veracode
 

Sample Customers

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates
Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.
Buyer's Guide
Mend.io vs. Veracode
June 2025
Free Report: Mend.io vs. Veracode
Find out what your peers are saying about Mend.io vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Mend.io vs. Veracode report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors, best Software Composition Analysis (SCA) vendors, and best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.