IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention
March 2020
Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
621,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage.""The most valuable features of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator are the easy-to-use console, and lots of reports, such as customized reports and inventory reports. Additionally, overall the centralized management is very good where you can see the compliance levels and inventory.""The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect.""McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern.""The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly.""The feature that I have found most valuable is its general purpose of protecting our endpoints from infections, malicious files, and all those kinds of things. The fact that there are organized policies and policy inheritance. The general management.""Technical support is very helpful.""The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pros →

"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service.""There should be more insights and completeness into the cyber kill chain, similar to CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. It just seems a little outdated in being 100% signature-based without all of the insights and protections that come with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. Overall, they've got some catching up to do if they plan to compete in the comprehensive EDR space.""Sometimes agents hang. We have to reinstall the agents.""The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved.""Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses.""The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this.""As for improvements, I think that putting everything on a cloud and one console would be a great idea and would be useful for customers.""I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required."

More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Cons →

"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."

More Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is attractively priced. It is a fraction of what we're going to pay for CrowdStrike or SentinelOne, but it only has a fraction of the capabilities as well."
  • "There is a license required to use this solution. If we use the additional components, such as DLP encryption, there is an additional cost. However, it is similar to a separate product altogether. If you want to use that or not, it is optional, but when you use it, it will cost you additional pricing."
  • "McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is not an expensive solution."
  • More McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
    621,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Mcafee's MVision ePO or ePolicy Orchestrator network security software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Mcafee's ePolicy… more »
    Top Answer:The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly.
    Top Answer:Choose your anniversary cycle e.g. pay annually. You just pay for what you want your license to cover. It is modular. It depends on the feature you want. There's the firewall, DLP, drive encryption… more »
    Top Answer:This solution could definitely have fewer bugs. Most of the functions don't work in the way that they are supposed to. It needs a bit of quality control. At the moment, there are so many bugs that it… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,854
    Comparisons
    2,686
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    537
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    1,666
    Comparisons
    938
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    615
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    McAfee ePO, ePolicy Orchestrator, Intel Security ePolicy Orchestrator
    Trend Micro Data Loss Prevention
    Learn More
    Overview
    McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator (McAfee ePO) is the most advanced, extensible, and scalable centralized security management software in the industry. Unifying security management through an open platform, McAfee ePO makes risk and compliance management simpler and more successful for organizations of all sizes.

    Now more than ever, your data is on the move—whether it’s on a laptop, flash drive, or moving across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures. At any point along the way, your financial data, customer information, intellectual property, or trade secrets could be lost or stolen. Securing this data is further complicated by several growing risk factors:

    Rapidly evolving compliance regulations and mandates, including GDPR
    Continued growth of workforce mobility
    Employees using their own mobile devices and consumer apps for work
    Rising frequency of advanced persistent threats (APTs) and data breach incidents

    To avoid the embarrassment, reputation damage, regulatory fines, and revenue loss, today’s enterprise must be able to identify, track, and secure all confidential data from multiple points within the organisation and in the cloud without impacting employee productivity and performance. In the past, many organisations tried traditional data loss prevention (DLP) solutions but found they were too intrusive, too complex to manage, and too costly to acquire, deploy, and maintain.

    Offer
    Learn more about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator
    Learn more about Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention
    Sample Customers
    Brelje & Race, Cognizant, Sutherland Global Services, Eagle Rock Energy, Arab National Bank, Bank Central Asia, Kleberg Bank, Leading Mexican Bank, SF Police Credit Union, Macquarie Telecom, Seagate Technology, Blackburn & Darwen Council, California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, IRCEP, Major U.S. State Government, State of Alaska, State of Colorado, Cemex, Deutsche Edelstahlwerke
    Excite Japan, MEDHOST, United Way of Greater Atlanta, University of Florida at Shands
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise32%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention
    March 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
    621,548 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 5th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 9 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 1 review. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Improves endpoint security well but takes a lot of resources to do so". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Protects against data leakage and can monitor and block people taking data out of the environment, but needs more features". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with McAfee MVISION ePO, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk Phantom, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, ESET Safetica and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention. See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.

    We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.