"The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator are the easy-to-use console, and lots of reports, such as customized reports and inventory reports. Additionally, overall the centralized management is very good where you can see the compliance levels and inventory."
"The graphical interface of the solution is its most valuable aspect."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."
"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its general purpose of protecting our endpoints from infections, malicious files, and all those kinds of things. The fact that there are organized policies and policy inheritance. The general management."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."
"I'm not an administrator of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, but an end-user, and what I like about it is that it can detect events that could cause data loss. It's a good solution."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."
"There should be more insights and completeness into the cyber kill chain, similar to CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. It just seems a little outdated in being 100% signature-based without all of the insights and protections that come with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. Overall, they've got some catching up to do if they plan to compete in the comprehensive EDR space."
"Sometimes agents hang. We have to reinstall the agents."
"The solution sometimes has some false positives on IP addresses, from the web control aspect of the product. This needs to be improved."
"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."
"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."
"As for improvements, I think that putting everything on a cloud and one console would be a great idea and would be useful for customers."
"I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required."
"Having more features apart from what the product was designed for is what I'd like to see in its next release."
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 5th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 9 reviews while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is ranked 13th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 1 review. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Improves endpoint security well but takes a lot of resources to do so". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention writes "Protects against data leakage and can monitor and block people taking data out of the environment, but needs more features". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with McAfee MVISION ePO, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Splunk Phantom, whereas Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, ESET Safetica and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention. See our McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator vs. Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention report.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
