Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs Nagios Core comparison

Juniper and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #46 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nagios is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. Juniper holds a 0.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

222 Views
140 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,161 Views
3,242 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Nagios Core and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network monitoring and management. Although Nagios Core is noted for its pricing and support, Marvis stands out with its advanced features, making it a favored choice for innovative network management.

Features: Nagios Core offers traditional network monitoring, customizable alerts, and extensive plugin support. Marvis provides AI-driven insights, proactive troubleshooting, and automated performance optimization.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Core could benefit from enhanced AI integration, streamlined configuration processes, and improved scalability. Marvis may enhance user interface simplicity, broaden plugin options, and reduce dependency on proprietary technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core involves straightforward installation but requires manual configuration, potentially posing a learning curve. Marvis, as a cloud-based solution, offers fast deployment and integration, supplemented by strong customer service for network complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core's open-source model leads to minimal initial costs and a strong ROI for budget-conscious users. Marvis, with higher upfront expenses, promises significant ROI through its efficiency and advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

46th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.0%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at Shree Atharva Sales Corporation

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"I would rate the overall solution ten points out of ten."

"The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful."

"What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services."

"The solution is quite efficient."

"Key features include the GUI interface, its notification capabilities, and the real-time reporting."

"I like that it's very simple to install, easy to manage and deploy, and easy to use for monitoring."

"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."

"Nagios Core integrates with tools like Splunk, Datadog, or Dynatrace. It is usually used as a feed to provide more technical information about devices or hosts to another system."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"Making it a little easier to configure and set up from the start would help. There are multiple layers that you have to wade through to be able to set it up, to do it the right way, and to get it to do what you want it to do."

"The initial setup process could be easier."

"The alerting mechanism in Nagios Core could be improved."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"The tool needs to improve the integrations."

"The core version is no match for the XI version."

"Would benefit from aggregations if a particular server goes down."

"Nagios Core does not have a graphic display."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"The solution is expensive."

"It's free."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

"We are using the free version of Nagios Core."

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 40% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 31% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 29% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 26% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 9% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

April 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.