Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs Nagios Core comparison

Juniper and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Juniper is ranked #48 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nagios is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3. Juniper holds a 0.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Read 2 Marvis Virtual Network Assistant reviews

377 Views
313 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

3,994 Views
3,475 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Nagios Core and Marvis Virtual Network Assistant compete in network monitoring and management. Although Nagios Core is noted for its pricing and support, Marvis stands out with its advanced features, making it a favored choice for innovative network management.

Features: Nagios Core offers traditional network monitoring, customizable alerts, and extensive plugin support. Marvis provides AI-driven insights, proactive troubleshooting, and automated performance optimization.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Core could benefit from enhanced AI integration, streamlined configuration processes, and improved scalability. Marvis may enhance user interface simplicity, broaden plugin options, and reduce dependency on proprietary technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core involves straightforward installation but requires manual configuration, potentially posing a learning curve. Marvis, as a cloud-based solution, offers fast deployment and integration, supplemented by strong customer service for network complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core's open-source model leads to minimal initial costs and a strong ROI for budget-conscious users. Marvis, with higher upfront expenses, promises significant ROI through its efficiency and advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Marvis Virtual Network Assi...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

48th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 2.5%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nagios Core	2.5%
Marvis Virtual Network Assistant	0.3%
Other	97.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

PRADIPJOSHI

Owner at a transportation company with 11-50 employees

Used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts and works on artificial intelligence

I always recommend Marvis to every customer because it requires no additional direct involvement. Marvis has been developed well using AI and machine learning technology. Its AI engine updates itself regularly, which is a beneficial feature. I request that Juniper integrate a cloud identity engine and simplify the Microsoft Azure Active Directory Services integration with the SRX hardware firewall. Additionally, the SRX firewall needs a more robust graphical user interface. Currently, we can only configure the SRX using the CLI; if a wrong command is entered, restoring it cannot be easy. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you ask any questions about Marvis, it will respond immediately and use some solution. It will be very easy and save you time."

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant uses AI to find problems or to get information from devices."

"Provides timely notifications."

"I would rate the overall solution ten points out of ten."

"Nagios Core integrates with tools like Splunk, Datadog, or Dynatrace. It is usually used as a feed to provide more technical information about devices or hosts to another system."

"We mostly use Nagios Core to integrate with Python and Bash Script."

"Nagios monitors our servers, so we know if anything goes wrong and can solve the problem before it happens."

"I like that it's very simple to install, easy to manage and deploy, and easy to use for monitoring."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it offers proper alerting capabilities."

"The most valuable feature of Nagios Core is the ability to check the availability of the server for network connectivity. Additionally, the interface is good."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"It should add real-time application visibility."

"It would be a good idea to integrate the solution to support other vendors besides Juniper."

"Nagios Core can improve the graphical interface, it would make things a little easier."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"Bandwidth monitoring is the pain point for me because Nagios Core does not monitor bandwidth effectively like Cacti does."

"The dashboard and monitoring features could be improved."

"Nagios Core is limited in terms of distributed setups, and there is no central view for remote data centers."

"The scalability needs improvement, it's not scalable at this time."

"We're using the free version, which limits us in terms of the things that we can do. If we had the paid version, a lot of our issues would probably go away. For example, we can't isolate instances that are being built or updated with the production ones. When they're being built, on Nagios, they're showing in red. It'd be nice to be able to partition those off until they're all green, and then we can bring them into the environment. This is probably because we've got the free version and not the paid version. If we went for the paid version, it would probably allow us to do exactly what we want to or remove the restrictions that we have, but if we are able to isolate instances in the free version, it would make life much easier."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution."

"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."

"The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."

"We are using the free version."

"Most the plugin features are free."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

21%

Retailer

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant is not an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It should add real-time application visibility. Marvis's interface is good. We don't need any additional interface. However, if it could accept voice commands, that would be a great improvement

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Marvis Virtual Network Assistant?

It is mainly used for troubleshooting and receiving real-time alerts. Marvis makes it easy to track the issue by providing specific information, like the exact time the connection was lost. It simp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 39% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 30% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 19% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Marvis Virtual Network Assistant

Compared 12% of the time

More Marvis Virtual Network Assistant Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 21% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 12% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmk vs Nagios Core

Compared 6% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2025

Download Marvis Virtual Network Assistant product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

September 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Overview

Marvis is the first network assistant in the industry to bring conversational AI to networking, transforming the way IT teams interact and engage with enterprise networks. In the era of AIOps, Marvis delivers streamlined operations, simplified troubleshooting, and remarkable user experiences.

Juniper

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core

September 2025

Free Report: Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.