ManageEngine Log360 vs Pandora FMS comparison

Read 22 Pandora FMS reviews

5,558 Views
1,334 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and Pandora FMS are products in the IT management domain. Although Pandora FMS offers robust features and a more comprehensive solution, users often prefer the pricing and support provided by ManageEngine Log360, emphasizing its cost-effectiveness.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 features strong integration capabilities, an effective alert system, and easy data collection for quick responses. Pandora FMS provides comprehensive monitoring features, adaptability for broader coverage, and high scalability for diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 users highlight the need for improved reporting capabilities, less complex configurations, and enhanced user interface flexibility. Pandora FMS users point to occasional documentation issues, a steep learning curve, and the need for more intuitive dashboards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 is noted for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Pandora FMS, while requiring a more detailed deployment process, offers strong customer support valuable to its users.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is recognized for competitive pricing and transparency, offering strong perceived value. Pandora FMS has a higher initial setup cost but users recognize the long-term ROI due to its extensive functionality, appealing to those seeking long-term solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Log360 vs. Pandora FMS Report (Updated: August 2026).

ManageEngine Log360 vs. Pandora FMS

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (26th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (14th)

Pandora FMS

Ranking in Log Management

61st

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (66th), Server Monitoring (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (58th), Cloud Monitoring Software (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.4%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pandora FMS is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine Log360	1.4%
Pandora FMS	0.6%
Other	98.0%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Burak Karakurt

Consultant at TurkOnay Elektronik Para ve Ödeme Hizmetleri A.Ş.

Has fulfilled regulatory requirements through centralized log management

The alerting capabilities in ManageEngine Log360 needed work for creating alarms for the cases where alarms were needed and for prioritizing the alarms for criticality. ManageEngine Log360 uses PostgreSQL as its own database but does not automatically parse and allow creation of alarms the way it does in MS SQL. There is less support in PostgreSQL than in MS SQL. The ability to create alarms based on parsed data in the same way MS SQL does would have been beneficial and would have saved considerable time. On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work. This support is needed, and I am sure many companies need this support on PostgreSQL. MS SQL features that were missing in ManageEngine Log360 that should be included in the future are those that automatically parse an MS SQL database and provide options for setting alarms. On the PostgreSQL side, this is not the same. At minimum, PostgreSQL support should reach the MS SQL level of features and support that ManageEngine Log360 presents.

Read full review

MichaelMaack

Independent Consultant at Maack Consulting

The open architecture is easy to extend and enhance

Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas. They could improve their management console's ability to monitor large environments could be improved. For example, SNMP management is only partially integrated into the management console.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reports that you can run are really nice; they give you a lot of standard reports, which are nice, and the ability to run some custom ones, too."

"We have had a fantastic experience with customer service and support."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."

"If the client does not have much knowledge regarding the SOC and cyber, then ManageEngine Log360 is good because you can get default reports."

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the consolidating of the reports, being able to take action and send them to email several addresses."

"ManageEngine Log360 could integrate with all systems, making it possible to integrate everything to the central location, which made it a useful and necessary tool."

"The support provided is fantastic, and ManageEngine Log360 provides the same capabilities that were being enjoyed with AlienVault while suiting the budget and providing what is needed."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

"The support from Pandora FMS is legendary."

"Pandora FMS provides us with a general report (graphical) about all of the connected devices, which helps with planning new stations and tracking them."

"Thanks to this software and to the work of the support team, we have everything under control."

"We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool."

"The most valuable feature is that it is an all-in-one monitoring system."

"This solution has screens that are easy to understand and provide a wealth of information."

"This tool has been of great help because we can manage faster solutions with the problems in our network and it helped us reduce our response time."

"What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it."

More Pandora FMS pros

Cons

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

"ManageEngine Log360 could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox."

"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."

"The solution needs to improve hub storage. It should integrate AI and ML capabilities."

"The on-premises solution is very slow. When I move to another tab inside Log360 or in the SIEM, even if my system is running on 36 GB and with a high processor, it takes a lot of time to get into the alert page or the search page."

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not a stable solution. It needs improvement."

"We are always facing more difficulties right now because we are learning."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

"It would be helpful to include the generation of reports for times that the network was out of service."

"When it comes to the definition of local Software Agents for the first time in the open-source version, it can become very tedious."

"Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery."

"It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS."

"I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity."

"I would like to have a dashboard with all assets displayed, with a quick hover-over status."

"In its versions for Linux, in the beginning, it can be somewhat complicated to configure and implement."

"The product lacks APIs for integration with other systems and we have issues with monitoring."

More Pandora FMS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."

"You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."

"In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."

"My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."

"Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."

"They are very competitive on the pricing side. That's one reason why my manager keeps using it."

"Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."

"The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."

More Pandora FMS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 7% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 7% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 4% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Zabbix vs Pandora FMS

Compared 8% of the time

Nmap vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios Core vs Pandora FMS

Compared 5% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

Wazuh vs Pandora FMS

Compared 4% of the time

More Pandora FMS Competitors

Product Reports

ManageEngine Log360

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Download Pandora FMS product report

Overview

ManageEngine Log360 offers comprehensive log management and security alerting, integrating advanced analytics for threat detection and compliance reporting. Scalable for on-premise and hybrid deployments, it facilitates incident response with seamless system integration and user-friendly monitoring.

ManageEngine Log360 enhances visibility across IT infrastructures by aggregating logs from Active Directory, file servers, and network devices, aiding in security incident detection with User Behavior Analytics and threat identification tools. Its modular approach supports compliance in vital sectors such as aerospace, contributing significantly to centralized monitoring and anomaly detection. By reducing manual log examination, Log360 aligns with both security and operational goals across diverse environments, though areas like integration with Active Directory and interface improvements are avenues for advancement. Streamlining data retention and expanding automation are priorities for its evolution, ensuring effective incident management with reduced administrative burdens.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Log360?

Security Monitoring: Active detection and logging of security threats across networks.
User Behavior Analytics: Identifies anomalies and potential threats in user activity.
Compliance Reporting: Facilitates adherence to industry regulations with detailed reports.
Unified Dashboard: Provides a comprehensive view for effective incident response.
Agentless Monitoring: Minimizes system overhead while maintaining oversight.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing infrastructure needs.
Simplified Management: Reduces manual log analysis and management workload.
Integration Capabilities: Aids in cohesive operations across various environments.
Compliance Support: Ensures industry-standard regulatory adherence.

In sectors like aerospace, Log360 supports compliance demands by integrating log management for enhanced security and regulatory reporting. Its adaptability to on-premises and hybrid structures makes it valuable for technology-driven environments, where security and efficiency are paramount.

ManageEngine

Pandora FMS offers comprehensive monitoring for IT infrastructure and services, supporting hybrid environments and enhancing operational efficiency with customizable architecture and seamless tool integration.

Pandora FMS provides a user-friendly platform for monitoring servers, network devices, and applications across virtual and cloud environments. Its agent options, centralized management, and high availability configurations allow it to support extensive network infrastructures. Offering robust alarm systems and lightweight operation, it adapts to enterprise needs, whether large or small. Users benefit from flexible metrics and plugins, although improvements in automation, analytics, and expanded API integration are anticipated. Challenges include interface instability in older versions and the need for improved dashboard customization, real-time monitoring, and cloud integration.

What features does Pandora FMS offer?

All-in-One Monitoring: Supports a wide range of platforms and devices for comprehensive visibility.
Customizable Architecture: Integrates seamlessly with external tools for tailored solutions.
High Availability Configurations: Ensures continuous monitoring and operation.
Flexible Metrics and Plugins: Enables tailored monitoring setups for diverse needs.

What are the benefits and ROI?

Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring processes and improves time management.
Scalability: Adapts to growing infrastructures without sacrificing performance.
Seamless Integration: Works well with existing IT tools and environments.
Comprehensive Coverage: Provides extensive oversight across a variety of platforms and environments.

In specific industries, Pandora FMS is utilized for IT service supervision, infrastructure monitoring, and network device management. Organizations leverage it to maintain network quality, ensure compliance, predict issues, and manage inventory and security. It supports both remote desktops and clients' systems, making it valuable for generating SLA reports and monitoring hybrid server environments. Pandora FMS's adaptability allows it to serve diverse sectors by facilitating efficient supervision and control.

Sample Customers

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes

ManageEngine Log360 vs. Pandora FMS