We performed a comparison between Make and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Pricing and Cost Advice →
Make is ranked 28th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is ranked 21st in Process Automation with 2 reviews. Make is rated 7.0, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Make writes "An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator writes "Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location ". Make is most compared with Camunda, whereas Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is most compared with Camunda, Ivanti Automation, OpenText Operations Orchestration, ServiceNow Orchestration and BizTalk Server. See our Make vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.