Lumu vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Lumu Technologies and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Lumu Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Trellix is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.0. Lumu Technologies holds a 2.2% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lumu Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

1,747 Views
821 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Read 16 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews

1,144 Views
1,018 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Lumu

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and Lumu are major players in the cybersecurity landscape. Trellix edges out with robust support, while Lumu shines with comprehensive features that justify its cost.

Features: Trellix Intrusion Prevention System focuses on advanced threat detection, customizable security policies, and a fortified network perimeter. It offers comprehensive threat analysis capabilities, excellent for in-depth security management. Lumu excels in rapidly identifying and mitigating threats through enhanced network visibility and automated intelligence. It emphasizes comprehensive threat visibility and response, making it a go-to for adaptable threat management strategies.

Room for Improvement: Trellix could enhance its agility by better integrating cloud-native solutions and simplifying user interfaces for real-time analytics. Responding faster to dynamic threat landscapes and offering a more intuitive setup would boost its appeal. Lumu can improve by expanding integration options with existing infrastructure and enhancing customization capabilities for unique security needs. Strengthening offline device monitoring and advanced reporting should also be considered.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix provides seamless integration with existing infrastructure and strong support services, making deployment efficient for traditional setups. In contrast, Lumu offers a cloud-native deployment model characterized by user-friendly installation and rapid troubleshooting, supported by responsive customer service. The difference lies in Trellix's traditional on-premise approach compared to Lumu's nimble cloud-native strategy that appeals to modern operating environments.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix Intrusion Prevention System involves a high initial setup cost but delivers a strong ROI through robust defense capabilities and sustained security value. Its long-term benefits offset the initial investment. Lumu offers a more affordable setup with a swift ROI due to its efficient threat management and simplicity, ensuring immediate financial viability. Trellix's higher upfront costs are justified by its enduring security benefits, while Lumu's cost-effectiveness is appealing for quick returns.

To learn more, read our detailed Lumu vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lumu

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

9th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Detection and Response (NDR) (7th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Trellix Intrusion Preventio...

Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Lumu is 2.2%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 2.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Lumu	2.2%
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System	2.7%
Other	95.1%

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)

Featured Reviews

Jeremiah Johnson

Director, Information Technology at a educational organization with 201-500 employees

Constant monitoring and analysis boosts network security

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful. Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares. As the community grows for Lumu then that will improve, but that is not really a criticism of Lumu, they simply have not been around that long.

Read full review

Bhupesh-Sharma

Large account Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited

Has offered reliable threat protection and detailed network insights but could expand features beyond existing capabilities

The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs). They track and collect data from APTs, which allows them to track malicious files entering the environment. The system offers inline prevention and real-time automatic blocking of malicious packets before they reach the network. It integrates with the Trellix ecosystem and provides application visibility and control. The solution provides deep insight into network traffic, applications, and protocols for better information. All packets coming through the application are analyzed and reported. They share intelligence updates regularly to protect from different malicious files and sector-specific threats. It supports both on-premise and cloud environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."

"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of signatures in IPS."

"It has a lot of functions, such as firewall. We are administrators, and we create some rules to protect our network. We also monitor the traffic in and out and have disk encryption on-premises. When we detect malware, we scan for the virus on the PC. We can then delete or block the malware."

"Overall the solution is very good. It offers great protection and gives us a good overview of what is on the network."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The best features of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System include advanced ATP (Advanced Threat Protection), which uses signatures, behavior analysis, and machine learning to stop zero-day exploits and malware advanced persistent threats (APTs)."

"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."

"The solution can scale."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros

Cons

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"The reports need improvement."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"The technical support must be improved."

"The platform’s GUI could be the latest."

"The management console needs to be less complex and easier to navigate."

"Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching."

"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."

"The solution could improve some aspects of detection."

"The management component could be simplified."

"The area of concern where the tool needs improvement is how the product prompts users at a network level that helps prevent any wireless network attacks through alerts and notifications."

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."

"The tool is competitively priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?

The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?

The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System does not provide virtual patching. Patching involves updates on the OS side to address vulnerabilities, which is a different functionality. Trellix Intrusion Pre...

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 35% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 13% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 7% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 17% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 11% of the time

Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

January 2026

Download Lumu product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

January 2026

Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report

Download Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS

Overview

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems

Buyer's Guide

Lumu vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

December 2025

Free Report: Lumu vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System

Find out what your peers are saying about Lumu vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Lumu vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.