LRS Dynamic Report System vs OpenText Output Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Ranking
4th
out of 4 in Output Management
Views
115
Comparisons
66
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
out of 4 in Output Management
Views
270
Comparisons
157
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Dynamic Report System
HPE Output Server, HP Output Server, Output Server
Learn More
Overview

The Dynamic Report System (DRS) provides an effective means of routing reports from batch jobs, online applications (i.e., CICS, IMS, IDMS, etc.), Local Area Networks, and remote TCP/IP hosts to the JES spool, to a DASD file on the MVS host system, or to a UNIX HFS file.

The reports are standard SYSOUT, DASD, or HFS datasets. They can be fixed, variable, or undefined format, blocked or unblocked. They can have ASA, machine, or no carriage control. SYSOUT datasets can have standard JES dataset attributes, such as class, destination, form name, writer name, FCB, UCS, hold/nohold, copies, etc.

In addition, AFP attributes (e.g., PAGEDEF, FORMDEF, etc.) can be assigned to the SYSOUT reports by referencing OUTPUT JCL statements.

OpenText Output Management is a family of integrated software products that ensure reliable delivery of print jobs to output resources in both distributed and non-distributed environments - everything from printers and fax destinations to e-mail and Web destinations.
Sample Customers
Carilion Clinic, Memorial Hermann Healthcare, Wishard Health Services, TROY Group, North Broward Hospital District, Miele, BMW, KKH Insurance, RZ Verden, Capita PLC, RI Solution GmbH, Edward-Elmhurst Hospital, Mother Frances Hospital, Singapore Exchange Limited, Lennox International
Agilent, Allergan, Columbus McKinnon, HP, Iron Mountain, Moen, Valero

LRS Dynamic Report System is ranked 4th in Output Management while OpenText Output Management is ranked 1st in Output Management. LRS Dynamic Report System is rated 0.0, while OpenText Output Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Output Management writes "It's relatively easy to get a hold of resources that understand and know how they work". LRS Dynamic Report System is most compared with , whereas OpenText Output Management is most compared with LRS VPSX and Ricoh InfoPrint.

See our list of best Output Management vendors.

We monitor all Output Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.