LiveAssurance vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

BlueCat and Zenoss are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. BlueCat is ranked #35 with an average rating of 9.0, while Zenoss is ranked #52. BlueCat holds a 0.4% mindshare in IM, compared to Zenoss’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BlueCat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.

LiveAssurance

Read 3 LiveAssurance reviews

585 Views
562 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zenoss Cloud

Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews

2,016 Views
927 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveAssurance

Zenoss Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 27, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and LiveAssurance compete in IT management and monitoring solutions, each with unique strengths. LiveAssurance seems to have the upper hand due to its feature depth and deployment simplicity, making it more favorable for comprehensive monitoring needs.

Features: Zenoss Cloud offers predictive analytics, customizable dashboards, and robust integration capabilities with third-party applications, providing flexibility in diverse environments. LiveAssurance features extensive monitoring capabilities, detailed reporting functionality, and deeper analytic solutions, appealing to businesses prioritizing comprehensive data analysis over integration flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LiveAssurance presents streamlined deployment with minimal downtime and attentive customer service, beneficial for swift issue resolution. Zenoss Cloud ensures comprehensive support during setup but may require more technical resources for deployment. LiveAssurance's smoother implementation and customer-centric support give it a slight advantage for rapid, reliable deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud offers a cost-effective, scalable pricing model suitable for varying budgets, promising ROI through operational efficiency. LiveAssurance requires a higher initial investment but provides substantial ROI through enhanced monitoring and reduced risks. While Zenoss Cloud is attractive in affordability, LiveAssurance's superior features and analytic precision justify the additional cost for some organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed LiveAssurance vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

LiveAssurance vs. Zenoss Cloud

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LiveAssurance

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

35th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zenoss Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

52nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (28th), Event Monitoring (13th), Network Monitoring Software (76th), Server Monitoring (26th), Container Monitoring (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (43rd), AIOps (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of LiveAssurance is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LiveAssurance	0.4%
Zenoss Cloud	0.9%
Other	98.7%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Bob Stiles

Cyber Security Architect Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offers proactive issue detection through customized alerts enhances troubleshooting

We saw the benefits of BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance immediately after we deployed it. The enhanced analytics dashboard helps us prioritize troubleshooting. BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance detects potential issues and anomalies before they occur, provided we have set our thresholds. Without defined thresholds, the system may still identify problems, but we will only be alerted after the event. This proactive approach helps prevent issues rather than simply reacting to them. It provides diagnostic information to help with remediation. BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance significantly enhances our company's network stability by preventing outages. With over a hundred firewalls integrated into the system, it provides comprehensive monitoring and control, effectively minimizing potential downtime. BlueCat's solution has been instrumental in maintaining a highly reliable network environment, and its value in preventing disruptions is immeasurable.

Read full review

ClaudiaChen

Cloud Architect - Senior Technology Architect at Telstra

Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features

As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance provides excellent analytic capabilities for early problem detection, offering beneficial diagnostic information and actionable remediation steps."

"The most valuable aspects of BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance are remote commands, a core functionality for us, and automated remediation options."

"Thanks to BlueCat, we have not experienced any downtime in the past two years."

"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance's most valuable feature is its ability to analyze integrity and perform interrogations, providing alerts based on configurable thresholds."

"BlueCat's solution has been instrumental in maintaining a highly reliable network environment, and its value in preventing disruptions is immeasurable."

"It's easy to use."

"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."

"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."

"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."

"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."

"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."

"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."

Cons

"Considering that some of our junior engineers have limited coding expertise, incorporating features that assist in query construction or provide clear textual translations of code would be valuable."

"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance does not support all network security devices."

"We would greatly benefit from expanded BlueCat integrations, particularly through a robust API ingestion system that allows for custom integrations with other systems. Ideally, this would include a user-friendly message queue system that facilitates communication between BlueCat and any external system via APIs."

"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."

"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."

"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"

"The AI aspect needs to improve."

"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."

"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."

"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance is reasonably priced."

"BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance meets our budget requirements."

"The pricing for BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance is fairly comparable."

"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."

"It depends on the customer, what he wants."

"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."

"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance (BCIA)?

BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance is reasonably priced.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance (BCIA)?

BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance does not support all network security devices. We currently use BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance on-premises, but it lacks the AI capabilities that are becoming inc...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance (BCIA)?

My organization comprises a financial institution and a technology company. BlueCat Infrastructure Assurance, an internal service, helps accurately pinpoint issues within our systems.

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

SCOM vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios Core vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs Zenoss Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Zenoss Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LiveAssurance

January 2026

Download LiveAssurance product report

Buyer's Guide

Zenoss Cloud

December 2025

Download Zenoss Cloud product report

Also Known As

Indeni

Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics

Overview

LiveAssurance offers a comprehensive platform designed to enhance efficiency and decision-making through its advanced capabilities.

LiveAssurance provides an integrated approach to streamline operations with real-time data analytics and robust security features. Its scalability and ease of integration make it a versatile choice for enhancing operational productivity.

What are the key features of LiveAssurance?

Real-Time Data Analytics: Delivers insights to improve decision-making with up-to-date data.
Advanced Security: Protects sensitive information with industry-standard security measures.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with existing systems for smooth operation.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and use without extensive training.

What benefits or ROI can users find in reviews of LiveAssurance?

Increased Efficiency: Users report enhanced productivity with streamlined processes.
Cost Savings: Reduction in operational costs due to automation and optimization.
Improved Decision Making: Access to real-time analytics aids strategic planning.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection and compliance, reducing risks.

Industries like finance and healthcare implement LiveAssurance to manage complex data environments effectively; finance benefits from advanced analytics for risk assessment, while healthcare leverages security features for patient data protection, driving better outcomes and compliance.

BlueCat

Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.

Zenoss

Sample Customers

MasterCard, Bloomberg, Comcast, Office Depot, O'Reilly Auto Parts, Prudential, Wyndham Worldwide, iRobot, Leumi, Pelephone, Sheetz, Travelex

2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation

Buyer's Guide

LiveAssurance vs. Zenoss Cloud

January 2026

Free Report: LiveAssurance vs. Zenoss Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about LiveAssurance vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LiveAssurance vs. Zenoss Cloud report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.