Komodor vs Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] comparison

Komodor and Quest Software are both solutions in the Container Management category. Komodor is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #29. Komodor holds a 4.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Quest Software’s 0.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Komodor users are willing to recommend the solution.

Komodor

Read 5 Komodor reviews

1,242 Views
1,242 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Quest Foglight Container Ma...

40 Views
32 Comparison Views

Komodor

Quest Foglight Container Ma...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 23, 2025

Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] and Komodor compete in container management, with Komodor often identified as the superior choice due to its comprehensive feature set, despite Foglight's attractive pricing and support.

Features: Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] offers strong monitoring capabilities, providing insights into performance bottlenecks and resource utilization. It is capable of detailed analytics for performance tracking. Komodor sets itself apart with innovative incident management, deep integrations, and actionable workflows. It includes features that streamline troubleshooting processes, enhance operational efficiency, and reduce system downtime.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Quest Foglight is known for its straightforward deployment with minimal configuration requirements. Its customer service follows a traditional support approach. Komodor’s cloud-native design supports quick and seamless integration within Kubernetes ecosystems, coupled with proactive customer support and a comprehensive knowledge base.

Pricing and ROI: Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] presents a competitive setup cost, making it a cost-effective monitoring solution. Komodor, despite potentially higher initial costs, offers compelling ROI by significantly reducing downtime and improving operational efficiency, potentially leading to long-term ROI gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Container Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 863,331 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Komodor

Ranking in Container Management

13th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quest Foglight Container Ma...

Ranking in Container Management

29th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Komodor is 4.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] is 0.0%, down from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Management

Featured Reviews

Jacek Kisynski

Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier

Makes it easier for our development team to "own" Kubernetes, saving our SRE team time

There's nothing in particular that is wrong with Komodor. It's hard to say that there's something we would really like to see improved. I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development. I would like to see if we're utilizing nodes in the cluster, if pod allocation is optimal, how much idling we have, and whether we scale up and down efficiently. I would like to see them help us optimize costs further. Because, as our company grows and our clusters get busier and busier, any inefficiency is a lot of money wasted. That's definitely high on our wish list: anything that helps us track wasted resources. I am looking forward to using AI-powered troubleshooting workflow that Komodor unrolled recently.

Read full review

Use Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL]?

Share your opinion

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,331 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Wellness & Fitness Company

10%

Media Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Komodor?

The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Komodor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Komodor?

We are an HR analytics company, and we do a lot of data processing. Our customers send us their HR-related data, and we process it so that we can run analytics on it. We process it on Kubernetes cl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Portainer vs Komodor

Compared 81% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Komodor

Compared 14% of the time

Kubernetes vs Komodor

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor

Compared 2% of the time

More Komodor Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Komodor

July 2025

Download Komodor product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Management

June 2025

Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] report

Download Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

Foglight Container Management

Overview

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Komodor

Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] offered robust monitoring and management capabilities for containerized applications. Tailored for tech professionals, it provided insight into application performance, resource allocation, and potential bottlenecks within container environments.

Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] empowered users with actionable data to optimize container applications. Its features included comprehensive monitoring tools for real-time analysis of applications running in containers. It was designed for fast problem resolution and added value through its predictive analytics, enabling users to anticipate potential issues. Its analytics capabilities facilitated improved decision-making for container management strategies.

What are some key features of Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL]?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers insights into application performance with live data.
Resource Allocation Analytics: Assesses resource usage for efficiency optimization.
Bottleneck Identification: Pinpoints issues affecting container performance.
Predictive Analytics: Anticipates potential problems to pre-empt failures.

What benefits or ROI should users consider when evaluating Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL]?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines container operations for better resource use.
Cost Savings: Reduces expenses by optimizing infrastructure and avoiding downtime.
Increased Reliability: Enhances system stability through proactive insights.
Scalability: Supports growth by enabling efficient management of expanding environments.

Quest Foglight Container Management [EOL] found application in industries like finance and retail, where efficiency and reliability are crucial. Financial institutions utilized it to maintain service quality with reduced downtime while retailers managed supply chains seamlessly, adapting to demand shifts efficiently with its robust container insights.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

863,331 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Container Management vendors.

We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.