Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Kemp LoadMaster vs Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kemp LoadMaster and Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Kemp LoadMaster vs. Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager report (Updated: September 2022).
635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Any decent product will cost money and if you want great support and a great product, then you will want to spend the money on it."
  • "Nowadays, going with the virtual appliance is the easiest way and the cost is reasonable."
  • "They have multiple tiers of licensing and you can upgrade it easily."
  • "Pricing for the perpetual licensing was fair to us for the features and ease of use we received."
  • "This product has good value and features for the money."
  • "The setup cost and pricing plan is reasonable and will ultimately give you a worthy return."
  • "The costs for the Kemp Load Balancer solution are okay because, for a good product, you have to spend money."
  • "This is a cost-efficient product."
  • More Kemp LoadMaster Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Mitigates content security policy issues.
    Top Answer:We pay around $10,000 a year for licensing. There are no additional costs.
    Top Answer:The UI is very basic and not very attractive, so this could be an area for improvement. In the next release, I would like to see global load balancing and the ability to connect to networks not… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes.
    Top Answer:In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use… more »
    Top Answer:It's a load balancer for our front end application. We use the on-prem deployment model.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,649
    Comparisons
    5,545
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    616
    Rating
    9.8
    Views
    437
    Comparisons
    292
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    LoadMaster Load Balancer
    Learn More
    Overview

    Kemp LoadMaster provides High Availability, Scalability and Security for Application Delivery. Optimized load balancers for Hybrid Cloud and Public Cloud deployments. Available for Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS.

    Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.

    Offer
    Learn more about Kemp LoadMaster
    Learn more about Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
    Sample Customers
    Kent County Council, KEMP, SMA Solar Technology AG, RT€ Player , Victrix (Quebec, Canada), Texas A&M, Macmillan Cancer Support, Cisco, Austin Bank
    AlertBoot, Pernod Ricard, MyBuys, Fusebill, Triboo, Barbri, Cosentry, Gilt Groupe, Maisons du Monde, SUNY – Upstate University Health System, US Markerboard, Colorcon, Juniper Networks
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Transportation Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise55%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, Microsoft and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: September 2022.
    635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kemp LoadMaster is ranked 2nd in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 27 reviews while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 17th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Kemp LoadMaster is rated 9.8, while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Kemp LoadMaster writes "Straightforward configuration, easy to manage, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, Kemp LoadMaster is most compared with HAProxy, NGINX Plus, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Fortinet FortiADC, whereas Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, NGINX Plus and HAProxy.

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.