Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall vs Kemp LoadMaster comparison

"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."

"​Simple to install with good documentation."

"Security is considered the most effective feature in Kemp LoadMaster."

"I like that this is a Network Load Balancer that can be used practically with any application in the backend. They have how-to guides on how to set up Kemp NLB with Exchange, but you can use it as well for Sharepoint, RDS, or any other back end server."

"It has greatly fortified the performance and uptime of our front-door email ingress, simplified and segmented mail routing, and reduced admin overhead for mail issue resolution and troubleshooting."

"Failover is seamless and our services are rock solid."

"The DNS Load Balancer makes it so that I don't have to worry about site failures."

"We are most impressed with the ease of use and great support."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...The initial setup of Kemp LoadMaster is very simple."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."

"It would be helpful if there were a way to incorporate tooltips on the fields so that we don't have to dig through documentation."

"In the next release, they can introduce 360 views in the same dashboard to make it easier for users to view. The graphical information should be displayed on the dashboard."

"In my opinion, the layer seven loads balancing that we're mainly using for web servers, doesn't seem to pick up when there are issues at the application level."

"It would be very helpful to get all the http/https session logs by default in the log monitor without activating debugging mode like an apache web sever natively does"

"The only thing I have struggled with is setting up automatic backups."

"We have experienced at least one problem with stability, although it was fixed with an upgrade."

"Some documentation is out of date versus the new version, and things have been moved​."

"When we go serverless, we may again have to revisit this because the configuration needs to be changed. With this change, we can run into a lot of other configurations that we haven't got into, which involve additional expenses. It would be challenging to convince management to buy at that price point. It would be a balancing act of justifying that expense and the value, that is, how it is going to save a bit of time and make our platform secure. It can have better configuration ability. A lot of iterations happen when we have multiple servers pointing to the same domain. If we do not orchestrate carefully, it gets into a loop, which takes away the precious time of the user who is trying to subscribe to a service. It takes a little longer time to realize services as well as web pages."

"The product definitely provides what the organization needs and its cost is reasonable considering the value it brings."

"This product has good value and features for the money."

"The price is great and the value is definitely there."

"The price is lower than other options."

"The setup cost and pricing plan is reasonable and will ultimately give you a worthy return."

"The costs for the Kemp Load Balancer solution are okay because, for a good product, you have to spend money."

"Less expensive than Citrix."

"From a cost perspective, Kemp is very competitive and is not hard to justify by any means."