We performed a comparison between Kemp LoadMaster and Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Kemp LoadMaster provides High Availability, Scalability and Security for Application Delivery. Optimized load balancers for Hybrid Cloud and Public Cloud deployments. Available for Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS.
Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.
Kemp LoadMaster is ranked 2nd in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 27 reviews while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 17th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Kemp LoadMaster is rated 9.8, while Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Kemp LoadMaster writes "Straightforward configuration, easy to manage, and the technical support is good". On the other hand, Kemp LoadMaster is most compared with HAProxy, NGINX Plus, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Fortinet FortiADC, whereas Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, NGINX Plus and HAProxy.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.