We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"This is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The stability is very good."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is stable and runs all the time."
"The email security feature is really good."
"The most valuable use is detailing metadata collection from the endpoint and network."
"The solution is very easy to use. Its interface is very simple, and you can build IOC's indicators. You can use your rules to detect these attacks because you can leverage threat intelligence. Y"
"I feel the anti-ransomware update is one of the tool's valuable features."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"A great console with a user-friendly GUI."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"We have a cloud-based instance, so we can deploy all our configurations through the cloud. That's the beauty of FireEye."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"Detections could be improved."
"The solution is not stable."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is not a good product. We had problems with endpoints and the solution did not detect it. We didn't get any alerts about the attack."
"In some of the places I have come across, even though they use Kaspersky, the ransomware enters their system."
"The backup and recovery features of the product are not good."
"The solution lacks cloud integrations."
"The blind spot or gap in the platform is network analysis functionality."
"There should be better integration between the ePolicy Orchestrator and FireEye console. The integration of both consoles should be better."
"The product’s on-premise version is costly in terms of extra charges for SQL database and Windows server licenses."
"I would like to see more automation."
"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
"The performance could be better. I noticed that it slows down a bit."
More Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is ranked 53rd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 5 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 49 reviews. Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is rated 6.6, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform writes "The tool provides excellent sandboxing and email security features, but the backup and recovery features are not good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform is most compared with Darktrace, Trend Vision One and HP Wolf Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR. See our Kaspersky Anti-Targeted Attack Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.