Juniper WLC Series vs Omada Access Points comparison

Juniper and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Juniper is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.6, while TP-Link is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.6. Juniper holds a 1.1% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Juniper WLC Series

Read 14 Juniper WLC Series reviews

799 Views
791 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,354 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Juniper WLC Series

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Juniper WLC Series and Omada Access Points both compete in the wireless networking category. Juniper has an edge in programmability and scalability, while Omada stands out for its affordability and ease of use.

Features: Juniper WLC Series offers extensive programmability with a robust open API, AI features, and scalability with multi-SSID support and client load balancing. Omada Access Points provide wide compatibility, ease of use, reliable performance, excellent cloud-based management, and compatibility with both wired and wireless technologies.

Room for Improvement: Juniper WLC Series could improve traffic monitoring, simplify integration, and adopt modern security standards. Omada Access Points could enhance connectivity, speed, and security features, with improvements in API and user management tools being beneficial, along with adopting Wi-Fi 6 or 7 and better meshing capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products offer excellent on-premises deployment support. Juniper provides comprehensive technical support and good templating capabilities for network management. Omada offers responsive technical support and extensive documentation to ensure a satisfactory customer service experience.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper WLC Series is considered expensive due to yearly licensing fees but offers significant ROI through robust features. Omada Access Points are cost-effective with no subscription fees, making them a budget-friendly choice with better affordability compared to other high-end brands.

To learn more, read our detailed Juniper WLC Series vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Juniper WLC Series vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Juniper WLC Series

Ranking in Wireless LAN

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Juniper WLC Series is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.1%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Omada Access Points	4.1%
Juniper WLC Series	1.1%
Other	94.8%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Matilda Elwell

Technical Team Leader - Network &Security at STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL

Offers visibility and cost benefits

The tool has given us more visibility, but I'm not very technical, so I can't comment on specific features. However, the diagnostic tools for identifying system issues have greatly improved, which we appreciate. We still use Cisco ICE for authentication on the Juniper network, as we did before. We've seen cost benefits with the Juniper WLC Series, which was a key factor in our decision-making during the proof of concept. Besides cost improvements, we've also noticed better resolution of issues and faults in our help desk, thanks to the enhanced features.

Read full review

Prasad Wijesooriya

IT Manager at Hala Equipment Trading LLC

Well-suited for mobile and portable device usage but issues with stability

The problem is that when the number of users increases, TP-Link automatically drops the speed, and in terms of coverage, it falls short. We are not using any industrial-level equipment or accuracy. We are looking for something at the industrial level, advanced Access Points, not the basic ones from TP-Link. Omada Access Points could be improved in terms of connectivity and speed. That is the main thing. The other thing is security. Currently, most people are sharing their passwords, allowing unauthorized users to access Wi-Fi networks. So, the main areas for improvement are security, accessibility, and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The installation process is nice and easy."

"It is a very stable solution."

"There weren't any scalability issues, the product did what it had to do."

"The installation process is very easy."

"The AI integration with Marvis is very valuable."

"Juniper WLC Series is a very high-performance device designed for indoor wireless deployment."

"The tool has given us more visibility, but I'm not very technical, so I can't comment on specific features. However, the diagnostic tools for identifying system issues have greatly improved, which we appreciate. We still use Cisco ICE for authentication on the Juniper network, as we did before. We've seen cost benefits with the Juniper WLC Series, which was a key factor in our decision-making during the proof of concept. Besides cost improvements, we've also noticed better resolution of issues and faults in our help desk, thanks to the enhanced features."

"It prevents a large number of unauthorized modifications of access point devices."

More Juniper WLC Series pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is easy to deploy and reliable."

"We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisfied with Omada's performance as an engineer."

"The initial setup is not complicated."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"This product is easy to use."

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"Juniper WLC Series has certain shortcomings in traffic monitoring."

"Juniper lacks a network access control agent similar to solutions like Alubakya Path and Cisco ISE."

"The network coverage of Juniper WLC Series and Cisco is different. We need to add additional access points."

"There could be a high level of security."

"In my region, access to the product is very difficult and presents a logistical nightmare."

"There could be more information from the controller, and it could be easier to work with the controller lights. It's not easy to bring up the upgrades."

"We would prefer it if the solution could be less expensive."

"The support on offer to other vendors switching - like Aruba or Ruckus - could be improved."

More Juniper WLC Series cons

"Upgrading the hardware capabilities to newer versions like Wi-Fi 6 or Wi-Fi 7 would be a helpful improvement."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"Omada's ordering platform could be improved, though. Some of their distributors are a pain to work with."

"There should be more remote support for the mobile application."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"It's better for smaller organizations. This would not work for enterprises. It is not very scalable."

"TP-Link Auranet EAP is not very efficient, they need to improve it."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a certain amount that needs to be paid towards the licensing charges associated with the product, but though I am not sure, I feel the licenses that we have in our company are for three years."

"Juniper WLC Series is a bit pricey but worth its cost."

"The product is relatively affordable for enterprise companies."

"The licensing cost is quite high, but considering it's an enterprise solution, the complexity justifies the price."

"The solution's pricing is reasonable."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"Its benefit is that it is cost effective."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"The cost of Omada is much better than Aruba and Cisco, and it does what we need it to do in most cases. Around 10 percent of our clients need a more carrier-grade solution for mobile platforms."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper WLC Series?

Juniper WLC Series is a very high-performance device designed for indoor wireless deployment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper WLC Series?

Juniper lacks a network access control agent similar to solutions like Alubakya Path and Cisco ISE. There should be a network access control engine. Some customers find it challenging as they do no...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Juniper WLC Series?

I work with Juniper service provider solutions. I have a service provider customer and some enterprise customers in retail.

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 37% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 32% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 26% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper WLC Series

Compared 5% of the time

More Juniper WLC Series Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 16% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Wireless LAN

October 2025

Download Juniper WLC Series product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

September 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Juniper WLAN

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

WLC Series Wireless LAN Controllers deliver and manage wireless local area networks with the highest level of reliability, performance, security, and management in the industry. They integrate secure, wireless LANs with any size wired infrastructures, from small branch offices to the largest enterprise or university campus.

Juniper

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BAS Group, Borealis, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Jan Yperman Hospital, Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca, MercaSID, S.A., NHTV Breda University, Parklands College and Christopher Robin Pre-Primary, San Antonio Community Hospital, Sandia National Laboratories, Springfield Public Schools (SPS), St. Catherine University, TalkTalk, The Education Village, University of Copenhagen, University of the Highlands and Islands, University of the West of Scotland (UWS), Valdosta State University, Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec), zulily

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Juniper WLC Series vs. Omada Access Points

September 2025

Free Report: Juniper WLC Series vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper WLC Series vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Juniper WLC Series vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.