JIRA Service Management vs LinkLive comparison

Read 9 LinkLive reviews

861 Views
396 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

JIRA Service Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 29, 2025

JIRA Service Management and LinkLive compete in IT service management and customer engagement. JIRA Service Management seems to have an edge due to its robust integration capabilities and adaptability, while LinkLive stands out with advanced customer engagement tools.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers comprehensive incident, problem, and change management with strong automation and integration features. LinkLive provides communication options like video, chat, and secure messaging, enabling personalized customer interactions. The distinction is JIRA's broader IT focus compared to LinkLive's direct customer engagement emphasis.

Room for Improvement: JIRA Service Management could enhance user interface usability, expand customization options for non-technical users, and improve speed for better performance. LinkLive might benefit from offering more comprehensive reporting features, expanding integration capabilities with third-party platforms, and enhancing the flexibility of its deployment options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management supports both cloud and on-premise deployments, which aids integration with existing tools, supported by extensive documentation. LinkLive focuses on a rapid, cloud-centric deployment model, offering quick setup and easy integration, and places strong emphasis on direct customer service.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management generally involves a lower initial setup cost and provides opportunities for scaling, potentially leading to high ROI through improved process efficiency. LinkLive's pricing reflects its specialized customer engagement features, with ROI derived from enhanced customer retention and engagement capabilities. JIRA's pricing supports broader operations, while LinkLive's targeted features justify its cost.

To learn more, read our detailed JIRA Service Management vs. LinkLive Report (Updated: March 2026).

JIRA Service Management vs. LinkLive

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Service Management

Ranking in Help Desk Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)

LinkLive

Ranking in Help Desk Software

49th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Contact Center Platforms (9th), Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Help Desk Software category, the mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 6.3%, down from 9.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LinkLive is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Help Desk Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
JIRA Service Management	6.3%
LinkLive	0.4%
Other	93.3%

Help Desk Software

Featured Reviews

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Laurie A Aspinwall

VP, Service Center & Digital Banking Manager at Newburyport Bank

Great video conferencing, in-chat calling, and document sharing

I would give LinkLive a perfect ten out of ten rating. Despite being on a month-to-month contract, we could have easily switched to another provider. However, doing so would have been more expensive and time-consuming due to the simplicity and reliability of LinkLive's system. Their system's exceptional redundancy ensures consistent uptime, minimizing disruptions and downtime. LinkLive has recently been expanded from its initial implementation in the service center to encompass the entire company. Additionally, due to our merger with another financial institution, LinkLive is now being utilized by both entities. Before I joined the company, our organization had engaged a consultant to identify suitable customer engagement solutions. At that time, I was not particularly keen on LinkLive as they were not a widely recognized name. I favored more established options like Genesys and Five9. Consequently, I was initially skeptical of LinkLive. When we first adopted LinkLive, their technology was not yet fully mature. However, over the past few years, they have transformed into a completely different company. They have made significant investments in technological advancements and have emerged as a frontrunner in the industry. Moreover, LinkLive is exceptionally collaborative. We regularly provide suggestions, and their engineers are always receptive to our feedback and are willing to implement enhancement requests. Many of the enhancements they have made are based on our recommendations. As a result, LinkLive has evolved into a highly progressive technology company, and we are proud to be associated with them. LinkLive requires maintenance when we add or remove people. We are working on an enhancement with them to automate this process, making it the same as for phone numbers. This enhancement will cover permissions, call routing, and other relevant aspects. LinkLive may not have the same brand recognition as some of its competitors, but the value it offers is unmatched. The chat functionality is far superior to anything else on the market, and the sound quality is exceptional. Additionally, the people at LinkLive are passionate about technological innovation and committed to providing their customers with the best possible experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The query language and the ability to create views of the data are very useful."

"I think the general consensus is that Service Management is a good organizational and solid product."

"The customer portal allows users to register tickets themselves."

"It has improved our work in a number of ways. First, it has made everything much faster. Before Jira Service Management, it could take weeks to resolve a ticket."

"Overall, it's the best option on the market, after looking at other products."

"It is one of the best tools in the market right now."

"The dashboards are nicely laid out."

"JIRA can really scale perfectly for our needs."

More JIRA Service Management pros

"Within two months from a business standpoint, it was a slam dunk success."

"Being the president of our organization, I love the secured email because there are a lot of messages that I have to send out that are secure. There have not been any issues with sending the messages or with individuals receiving and viewing them."

"It improves our member experience and keeps them as members of our credit union."

"There are so many valuable features. One of the things that we really appreciate is the uptime. LinkLive rarely, if ever, goes down or disconnects calls. We appreciate that we don't have to be concerned about dropping calls or losing a customer mid-call as a result of those issues."

"One of the primary features we use it for is the Agent Connect screen-sharing feature. I find it invaluable when troubleshooting customer problems with online banking. It saves us time, and time is money."

"Our agents find the authenticated session feature to be the most helpful. It can take 30 to 45 seconds to verify someone with verifying questions through digital banking, and we didn't have the capability of verifying questions through digital banking before LinkLive. This feature allowed us to work in partnership with our digital banking provider, who can see that a customer is within an authenticated digital banking session. They do not need to ask verifying questions again to ensure that the person is who they say they are. That is one of the nicest things for us, and especially for our agents."

"More customers are getting taken care of, and that means we are seeing customer satisfaction."

"It's very reliable and we haven't had much experience with any downtime or dropped calls, which, of course, is one of the most important things to us. That's been a big win for us."

Cons

"For us, one of the weaknesses of Service Desk is that we can not check every issue in the queue raised for one product."

"It would be better if it had capabilities to connect to mobile applications (e.g., Whatsapp)"

"The main issue with this solution is there's no limited subscription available for plugins we only use for a few people."

"Its UI is a bit overwhelming for new users."

"Instability happens sometimes - although not frequently."

"It would be beneficial if we could turn comments into subtasks or other JIRA tickets directly."

"What needs to be added in Jira Service Management is the user screen. You'll find it very weird if this is your first time using the solution. The user-friendliness of its interface needs improvement."

"SaaS version for large organizations (more than 2000 users) is not available."

More JIRA Service Management cons

"I would like to see more video conferencing, some degree of mobile apps, and artificial intelligence."

"On the back-office side, it houses email addresses for when you look at the agent hunt groups. I can't use my work email address in my own online banking account because it messes up whether I'm an employee or a customer."

"The onboarding process could be enhanced by providing comprehensive training to all users, not just administrators."

"Our agents have made some requests for some automated responses and some ways that they could improve the way those get pushed out."

"In our experience, the areas where there could be improvement are training, staff adoption, and getting the staff comfortable with utilizing the complexities of LinkLive, such as screen sharing."

"The notifications for incoming chats could be a little more obvious. Our organization doesn't have a call center, so we don't have someone sitting at the computer waiting for a chat to come in. They're busy with other work."

"They could provide faster response times, but they got everything resolved."

"In our experience, the areas where there could be improvement are training, staff adoption, and getting the staff comfortable with utilizing the complexities of LinkLive, such as screen sharing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price for JIRA Service Management is reasonable and cheaper than other ITSM solutions, but the licensing model is different, so you cannot compare it with other solutions. Overall, the pricing for the solution is acceptable."

"I am using the free version, but my clients are paying for it. When they start, they evaluate it for 30 days, and after seeing the value, they move to its paid version."

"This is pricey solution. Should we move to using all cloud solutions in our business, we may move to different tools that have multiple functionality versus having a solution for each area. This would be too pricey and we would need to replace Jira with a different solution that also offers other features."

"On a scale of one to five, where five is a good price and one is high, I would rate this solution as a three. It isn't cheap but it's not ridiculous."

"It depends on the number of users but it starts at $20 per month per user. I would rate them a three out of five for pricing."

"It's not really expensive, especially when you compare to ServiceNow or other solutions, and it's not expensive to maintain."

"The pricing is very competitive and I think that it is okay."

"Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is fair."

"We have been very comfortable with the pricing. We are a smaller financial institution so pricing is always a factor. We feel that we are just getting a ton of value for what we are spending."

"In terms of cost, LinkLive was similar to other products. I find it reasonable. Its features, for the cost, were a better deal comparatively speaking."

"The pricing is exceptionally competitive, and the value we receive from LinkLive for the cost is a significant advantage."

"You definitely get more bang for the money with LinkLive.You can get a more expensive product that does what this one does, and possibly more, but for the cost, it works perfectly with our core system."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Construction Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	33

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

The price is actually reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 14% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 8% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

Genesys Cloud CX vs LinkLive

Compared 28% of the time

Cisco Webex Contact Center vs LinkLive

Compared 25% of the time

Freshdesk vs LinkLive

Compared 17% of the time

Avaya Infinity Platform vs LinkLive

Compared 14% of the time

TalkDesk vs LinkLive

Compared 9% of the time

Product Reports

JIRA Service Management

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Download LinkLive product report

Also Known As

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Revation LinkLive

Overview

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

LinkLive is an advanced communication platform designed to elevate the way businesses interact with their customers securely, enhance personalized customer engagement and team collaboration. The platform utilizes a combination of human expertise and artificial intelligence (AI) to provide secure communication solutions, and improving operational efficiencies. It was formerly known as Revation Systems.

At its core, LinkLive unifies voice, video, chat, and email communications into a single, integrated platform. This consolidation enables businesses to offer a more cohesive and responsive customer service experience. Users can seamlessly switch between communication modes, ensuring that customer interactions are both flexible and efficient.

LinkLive places a strong emphasis on security and regulatory compliance, making it an ideal choice for sectors such as healthcare, finance, and government, where data protection is paramount. The platform incorporates end-to-end encryption, robust access controls, and audit trails to safeguard sensitive information and comply with industry regulations like HIPAA, GDPR, and more.

Leveraging AI and machine learning, LinkLive offers advanced personalization capabilities. It can analyze customer data in real-time to provide personalized interactions and recommendations. This level of insight helps businesses tailor their services to individual customer needs, enhancing satisfaction and loyalty.

Charles Larsen, a Senior Director at Banner Health, shared with us that LinkLive is "very reliable and we haven't had much experience with any downtime or dropped calls, which, of course, is one of the most important things to us. That's been a big win for us."

Emily Aubele, Quality Assurance Director at United Way of Pennsylvania, shared with us that they chose LinkLive over other vendors, because with LinkLive, "all of the applications are in-house, meaning the chat, the text—everything that you use—is developed and maintained internally by LinkLive. In the other systems, chat, text, and video were all third-party applications."

Sample Customers

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

1. AT&T 2. Verizon 3. T-Mobile 4. Sprint 5. Comcast 6. CenturyLink 7. Vodafone 8. Orange 9. Telefonica 10. BT Group 11. Deutsche Telekom 12. Telstra 13. NTT Communications 14. China Mobile 15. SoftBank 16. SK Telecom 17. Telecom Italia 18. Bell Canada 19. Rogers Communications 20. Telus 21. KDDI 22. Swisscom 23. Telkom Indonesia 24. Singtel 25. Etisalat 26. Ooredoo 27. Turkcell 28. Saudi Telecom Company 29. Telecom Egypt 30. PLDT 31. MTN Group 32. América Móvil

JIRA Service Management vs. LinkLive