We performed a comparison between Jedox and Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The main strength of Jedox lies in mastering the navigation, especially the Excel add-in."
"The Excel interface is designed to retrieve data from the database and send it back, which is a significant advantage."
"The ETL itself was pretty useful and it's integrated in the tenant itself. So the Olap service technology was impressive to me. In order to extract that and load it in the tube in the same tenant or the same tool that was something magnificent because I actually missed this in SEB. SEB requires another tool, and you have to integrate all the tools together. But for Jedox, it was in the one tool."
"The ETL function simplifies many tasks."
"We can configure and have complete freedom while creating solutions."
"The solution is very versatile."
"The ease of reporting is one of Jedox's most valuable features."
"The data entry point is most valuable. The way we can customize our report or do data entry is very good."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud are the many capabilities it provides."
"The tool improves the organizational budgeting process in several ways. One significant aspect is the extensionable functionality it offers. To illustrate, consider a scenario where a company has factories in Mexico producing Volkswagen and Kentucky producing Ford."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud."
"The workforce, the cube database, is the most valuable feature where you do planning for your headcounts."
"We previously used Oracle EDS, and when comparing it to this solution, this solution has a much better interface. There are lots of advantages of the new solutions. Having it on the cloud, we are able to forget about keeping them updated or taking care of the database. We have minimal maintenance."
"Beneficial analysis and easy to do management adjustments."
"The product has a direct plugin to Microsoft Excel."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is ad hoc reporting."
"Jedox should improve the design and server issues."
"I don't find it particularly user-friendly."
"More emphasis is needed on the availability of the learning aspect of the solution. Because unless you take up their course that enables you to be an expert in creating the report, you must seek help."
"Visualization is something they need to improve. We have already told them about this, and they should be working on it."
"I think it's the design of the report because the design and the UI for the report is standard and lame. When you see a Jedox report, it doesn't seem like it's from today, because the technology is something from the last decade. The scalability needs improvement."
"There is not much training for Jedox."
"The solution should enable a modern look and feel in the front end."
"From a development perspective, there's room for improvement in the area called the designer, where you actually build your reports to make it easier to manage the process."
"The FR recording studio that is used to build reports is clunky and awful to use. This could be improved a lot. The solution does have problems and limitations."
"One potential improvement would be a more visual workflow, as the current method using a tax list is not as effective."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve. There are times when the forms are slow in saving and calculating."
"The tool's interface is outdated. However, OneStream is easier to navigate."
"For HR, the workforce planning out of the box is complicated. For most users, it's not easy, and it requires a learning curve. It's not very user-friendly. It can be improved."
"Some of the things in this product are just too cumbersome and we don't need them and they make it harder to do certain things, or certain things have to have more specific names or descriptions."
"There is middleware that we need to purchase for our use case that should be provided in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud. We should not have to purchase the additional solution and the integration should be seamless."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by having better integration with some other modules that we would add to this solution."
More Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
Jedox is ranked 4th in Business Performance Management with 13 reviews while Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is ranked 3rd in Business Performance Management with 16 reviews. Jedox is rated 8.0, while Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Jedox writes "Powerful BI tool for analyzing financial performance and stable performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud writes "Eliminates the need for users to sift through irrelevant options". Jedox is most compared with IBM Planning Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau and Anaplan, whereas Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is most compared with Oracle HFM, Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics and Vena. See our Jedox vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.