Jamf Protect vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

JAMF and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. JAMF is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.6, while Seqrite is ranked #43. JAMF holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JAMF users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Jamf Protect are both leading solutions in endpoint security management. Seqrite Endpoint Security is considered superior in pricing and support, whereas Jamf Protect stands out for its advanced features and is viewed as worth its higher price by users.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive protection mechanisms, including anti-malware, anti-ransomware, and data loss prevention. Jamf Protect is distinguished for its macOS-specific security features, seamless integration with Apple environments, detailed insights, and proactive threat monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Seqrite Endpoint Security needs improvements in system performance impact and interface intuitiveness. Jamf Protect could enhance its offerings with broader cross-platform support and better alerting functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seqrite Endpoint Security has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Jamf Protect is equally praised for deployment simplicity, with notable points for its dedicated macOS support and detailed onboarding processes.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite Endpoint Security stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust return on investment. Jamf Protect, despite a higher price point, justifies this with its exceptional macOS security capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jamf Protect is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Jamf Protect	0.8%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	94.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Nick Rudman

Project Manager at Wells Fargo

Security platform has reduced malware risk and has strengthened compliance for macOS endpoints

Jamf Protect provides multiple levels of telemetry collection, allowing me to select how sensitive I want to be on event triggers. Jamf Protect allows me to monitor against specific threat categories aligned to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. In addition to protection, I utilize Jamf Protect to monitor our endpoint compliance with the CIS critical security control baseline. If the environment is predominantly Apple based, Jamf Protect is a strong solution for providing EDR capabilities to endpoints. The detection capabilities are on par with other leading EDR tools, and it integrates well with Jamf MDM. The compliance telemetry, log forwarding, and USB device management included as part of Jamf Protect provide a good return on investment. Jamf Protect has had a positive impact on my organization, as it has been one of the best tools that protects against malware. It offers better detection of malware, reducing downtime and risk to our network by approximately 30 to 50 percent. Implementing it is straightforward, although there can be a steep learning curve in general, especially for less technical users. The competitive pricing included in the business package is great, and compliance with our security standards has been maintained.

Read full review

Nisar Ahmed Bellary

Senior Executive Talent Acquisition at Accion Labs

With DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities, the solution also offers great technical support

The most valuable features of the solution are DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities. It is a lightweight solution with good features, allowing for application control. The solution also offers good DLP features, and our company recently upgraded to use its XDR features. The solution's XDR features work smoothly in our company. With the lightweight nature of the solution and its features, my team was required to deploy the solution in our company. Our company also receives good support from Seqrite, which was one of the main reasons we chose the solution since we could get help if we faced any issues with the solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The positive impacts I see from Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks include a complete 360-degree view of our security posture altogether, being a uniform platform where we are ingesting logs from multiple resources."

"We use Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks for its ability to detect based on behavior rather than simple virus scan to prevent malicious activities."

"Technical support is the best in class, in my opinion, because they have invested heavily in research and development."

"Previously, we had to install endpoint protection per machine and then scan and update, but Cortex XDR basically does that centrally and predictably, so we have more time to do day-to-day work rather than spend time chasing those endpoints."

"The multi-layered approach to the product gives you confidence that it will stop exploits, ransomware, worms, or viruses from compromising endpoints, essentially providing peace of mind."

"There has been a significant reduction of approximately 70% to 80% in our internal MTTR and MTTD metrics, now around five to eight minutes whereas previously it was hours, which has helped tremendously."

"It's a perfect solution. It integrates well into the environment."

"Cortex XDR alerts us on the dashboard when there's a threat, which allows us to restrict that user and helps secure our infrastructure."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"My advice for others looking into using Jamf Protect is that it is an excellent tool to use to secure your devices, so I would recommend moving forward with it."

"Jamf Protect has positively impacted my organization by reducing malware, spam, and these kinds of threats from our company."

"Jamf Protect is a security product that helps us with CIS benchmarks and threat prevention."

"The product's initial setup phase has very simple steps."

"If your fleet consists completely of Apple devices, Jamf Protect is the best solution for you."

"I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"Jamf Protect offers next-generation antivirus and Apple specific defense features, with real-time updates that block or look for any malicious software on the device, such as Trojans or crypto miners, so people feel secure and we feel secure as administrators that end users are protected from ransomware and other kinds of malicious software."

"Jamf Protect's most effective features for threat detection include managing devices and applications, deploying and upgrading the OS, and its overall security features."

More Jamf Protect pros

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

"The most valuable features of the solution are DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities."

"We found the DLP to be innovative and useful."

"There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management."

"The two valuable features are anti-ransomware and data loss protection."

"With Seqrite, it is completely protected, and we have full control over what is happening on the end user's laptop."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"They are charging for Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA) services, so if the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"If he is using a smaller company, he can depend on some other tools because Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a bit expensive."

"The GUI could be improved."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can improve mobile integration to allow access to the console."

"If Palo Alto reduces the pricing slightly for their products, it would make them more scalable in markets such as India and globally for cybersecurity."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution's integration with other tools is slow."

"The customer service rating is four out of ten."

"The scope of improvement will fall under the support hierarchy that the tool offers to the latest version that Apple derives for any of the latest operating systems to launch."

"Jamf Protect can be improved because iOS and iPad protection is still limited compared to macOS coverage."

"Beginners need initial training."

"Jamf Protect can be improved by addressing the steep learning curve for the custom analytics engine."

"Regarding improvements for Jamf Protect, I receive the warnings related to insecure website accesses through mail at a later stage, so if they could be flagged the moment I visit them, that would be great because I would know exactly which website was causing the warnings."

"The dependency on Jamf Pro or SIEM or SOAR for some automations and integrations could be reduced."

More Jamf Protect cons

"When it comes to the support provided by the product, I see that Seqrite is not as mature as the other products in the market."

"It should be able to detect and report any ransomware attack but currently, it doesn't detect and it doesn't report any."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller. Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful."

"User management could be improved."

"In the next version, they should improve the areas of utility and centralized control."

"The solution could improve by providing better security and a cloud base version."

"A handbook of known issues and quick fixes should be given so that troubleshooting and frustration are less."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"If one wishes to work with another team or large number of users at a future point, he must purchase a license for them."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"I am using the Community edition."

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"Very costly product."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product price as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"Jamf Protect is an expensive solution."

"Jamf Protect costs double the price that we were paying before."

"It's significantly cheaper than other options like ApexOne."

"The licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis. Compared to other solutions, this solution is cheaper."

"You need to pay for a yearly license for Seqrite Endpoint Security, which is expensive."

"The license isn't expensive."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"We get the tool for around 1200 rupees for a three-year subscription. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

11%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	55

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Protect?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Jamf Protect was fine, but I am not aware of the pricing si...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jamf Protect?

Overall, Jamf Protect is a strong product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. First, I would like ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jamf Protect?

My primary use case for Jamf Protect is endpoint detection and response and threat monitoring for macOS devices. I us...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Jamf Protect

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Jamf Protect

Compared 5% of the time

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform vs Jamf Protect

Compared 3% of the time

More Jamf Protect Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 9% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

September 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect

September 2026

Download Jamf Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

August 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Jamf Protect provides comprehensive security for Apple devices, aiding in malware protection, threat prevention, CIS benchmarks, and USB blockages while supporting local accounts and password sync.

Designed for managing Apple devices, Jamf Protect offers robust security features, such as malware detection and prevention, unauthorized data transfer blocks, and enhanced security profiles. It allows seamless deployment and upgrades of applications, coupled with efficient endpoint management. The tool ensures zero performance impact while providing real-time notifications for password updates and comprehensive data protection across all Mac OS versions.

What are Jamf Protect's most notable features?

Quick OS Updates: Ensures devices are always up-to-date with the latest OS releases.
Zero Performance Impact: Doesn’t strain CPU resources, ensuring smooth laptop performance.
Real-time Notifications: Delivers timely alerts about password updates and security threats.
Comprehensive Data Protection: Guards against malware, data transfers, and external drive threats.
Zero-touch Integration: Simplifies deployment and device management without manual intervention.

What benefits do users see in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Significant reduction in malware and unauthorized data transfer incidents.
Efficiency: Streamlined device management and application deployment save time.
Performance: Lightweight design ensures devices run smoothly without slowing down.
Proactive Threat Detection: Early detection and prevention of potential threats safeguard data integrity.

Industries such as education, healthcare, and finance leverage Jamf Protect to maintain stringent security standards, streamline application deployment, and ensure devices meet compliance requirements. They benefit from real-time threat alerts, comprehensive data protection, and zero-touch integration, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

JAMF

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

September 2026

Free Report: Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.