Jamf Protect vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

JAMF and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. JAMF is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.6, while Seqrite is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.0. JAMF holds a 0.8% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JAMF users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Jamf Protect are both leading solutions in endpoint security management. Seqrite Endpoint Security is considered superior in pricing and support, whereas Jamf Protect stands out for its advanced features and is viewed as worth its higher price by users.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive protection mechanisms, including anti-malware, anti-ransomware, and data loss prevention. Jamf Protect is distinguished for its macOS-specific security features, seamless integration with Apple environments, detailed insights, and proactive threat monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Seqrite Endpoint Security needs improvements in system performance impact and interface intuitiveness. Jamf Protect could enhance its offerings with broader cross-platform support and better alerting functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seqrite Endpoint Security has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Jamf Protect is equally praised for deployment simplicity, with notable points for its dedicated macOS support and detailed onboarding processes.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite Endpoint Security stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust return on investment. Jamf Protect, despite a higher price point, justifies this with its exceptional macOS security capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,887 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jamf Protect is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Jamf Protect	0.8%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	94.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Nick Rudman

Project Manager at Wells Fargo

Security platform has reduced malware risk and has strengthened compliance for macOS endpoints

Jamf Protect provides multiple levels of telemetry collection, allowing me to select how sensitive I want to be on event triggers. Jamf Protect allows me to monitor against specific threat categories aligned to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. In addition to protection, I utilize Jamf Protect to monitor our endpoint compliance with the CIS critical security control baseline. If the environment is predominantly Apple based, Jamf Protect is a strong solution for providing EDR capabilities to endpoints. The detection capabilities are on par with other leading EDR tools, and it integrates well with Jamf MDM. The compliance telemetry, log forwarding, and USB device management included as part of Jamf Protect provide a good return on investment. Jamf Protect has had a positive impact on my organization, as it has been one of the best tools that protects against malware. It offers better detection of malware, reducing downtime and risk to our network by approximately 30 to 50 percent. Implementing it is straightforward, although there can be a steep learning curve in general, especially for less technical users. The competitive pricing included in the business package is great, and compliance with our security standards has been maintained.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Based on my experience, I would recommend Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks to other people."

"Based on my experience with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, I highly recommend it due to its quick response to zero-day attacks and low utilization from end-user devices."

"The solution allows us to make investigations. Other XDR solutions also provide similar capabilities but for investigation, Cortex XDR is better."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"We use it for malicious connections from malicious websites, to identify payloads that might be inside the traffic, to identify malicious processes or bugs that are running on the network, and any activities that tend to lead to data infiltration."

"The dashboard is customizable."

"I generally believe that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is probably the best in the market right now."

"The best feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it collects logs from different sections such as the endpoint, the network, and the cloud, making it easy to investigate alerts, collect some of the investigation packages related to the infected machines, and provide live response."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"If some other organization is using Jamf Pro, they should definitely go for Jamf Protect, as that will streamline many things for them."

"We mainly use Jamf Protect to protect staff computers from malware and antivirus."

"The behavioral detection is valuable."

"Jamf Protect's most effective features for threat detection include managing devices and applications, deploying and upgrading the OS, and its overall security features."

"The product's initial setup phase has very simple steps."

"Jamf Protect has positively impacted my organization by reducing malware, spam, and these kinds of threats from our company."

"The quick updates are really good. If a new OS update drops today, I'll have the Jamf Protect update within a few hours. It's also compatible with all Mac OS versions, and there's zero lag or performance impact."

"The tool's tech support is helpful and efficient. It also has an active community."

More Jamf Protect pros

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"The solution's current features include antivirus, web filtering, file activity monitoring, PAM, firewall, IDS/IPS, and DLP. Though I'm not familiar with the whole solution, it is good."

"The solution effectively detects malicious files and blocks sign-ins."

"I like Seqrite's web protection features and external device control."

"The most valuable features are the file activity monitors, DLP solutions, and application controls."

"The most valuable features of the solution are DLP, XDR, and EDR functionalities."

"The only thing that I have found useful is that I have an overview of my systems in the networks."

"The most valuable feature is its endpoint protection, particularly the antivirus component. It has been very effective in protecting our clients, and since its installation, we haven't encountered any issues with compromised endpoints or virus impacts."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"I have seen lagging with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. There was one time when we faced a threat actor trying to gain access to our system. When our team utilized the tool, we were all on the same dashboard and we faced a lag issue at that time of around five minutes, which was quite significant."

"I recommend adding a data loss prevention (DLP) solution to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a very good product, but financially, it is very expensive, so the company should look into that area."

"A potential area of improvement for Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the cost."

"The solution should enhance the ADR and reporting."

"There are some third-party solutions that are difficult to integrate with, which is something that can be improved."

"It would be good if they could make an exception for applications. Sometimes, it can be a bit of a challenge to make exceptions for certain applications that have been used as rogue."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I think they could improve their technical support because sometimes for emergency needs, I require one-to-one support and can't wait even 24 hours to resolve my issue."

"Jamf Protect can be improved by addressing the steep learning curve for the custom analytics engine."

"The solution's integration with other tools is slow."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"To improve Jamf Protect, I suggest enhancing the end user onboarding user experience, expanding out-of-the-box support for additional SIEMs, and noting that the user interface takes some getting used to."

"The customer service rating is four out of ten."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"Jamf Protect can be improved because iOS and iPad protection is still limited compared to macOS coverage."

More Jamf Protect cons

"The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved."

"Sometimes, small and medium businesses, or even startups with just five, ten, or fifteen systems, are also keen to secure their data. There is a reluctance on the part of the technical team to extend installation support when the opportunity sizes are smaller. Seqrite Endpoint Security has a lot of value. Still, its marketing could be done much better on a larger scale, especially in India, in light of the new DPDP 2023 Act, which the Indian Parliament passed. It would be even more valuable if Seqrite could incorporate features to help companies comply with this law, it would be even more helpful."

"The solution needs to improve stability."

"I don't feel that the scalability part of Seqrite Endpoint Security is better than the other products in the market."

"We are using Apple devices, and the advanced device control service doesn't work for M1 chips devices, like Apple MacBooks."

"User management could be improved."

"The support offered by the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"When it comes to the support provided by the product, I see that Seqrite is not as mature as the other products in the market."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our license will require renewal in August, after which the maintenance will continue as usual."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"I am using the Community edition."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It's significantly cheaper than other options like ApexOne."

"Jamf Protect is an expensive solution."

"The licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"Jamf Protect costs double the price that we were paying before."

"I rate the product price as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"As per the suggestions from one of the experts we know, it is advisable to make a proper comparison with the local vendors instead of solely relying on online prices, which are often higher and quite expensive."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The solution has reasonable pricing. There is one pricing without any hidden charges. They have to pay once a year or three years."

"Though I don't think that this is a cheaply priced product, I feel that it is an affordable solution."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,887 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

University

12%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	54

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Protect?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Jamf Protect was fine, but I am not aware of the pricing si...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jamf Protect?

Overall, Jamf Protect is a strong product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. First, I would like ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jamf Protect?

My primary use case for Jamf Protect is endpoint detection and response and threat monitoring for macOS devices. I us...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Jamf Protect

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 12% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 7% of the time

Tanium vs Jamf Protect

Compared 5% of the time

Nyotron PARANOID vs Jamf Protect

Compared 3% of the time

More Jamf Protect Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 11% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

July 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect

July 2026

Download Jamf Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

July 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Jamf Protect provides comprehensive security for Apple devices, aiding in malware protection, threat prevention, CIS benchmarks, and USB blockages while supporting local accounts and password sync.

Designed for managing Apple devices, Jamf Protect offers robust security features, such as malware detection and prevention, unauthorized data transfer blocks, and enhanced security profiles. It allows seamless deployment and upgrades of applications, coupled with efficient endpoint management. The tool ensures zero performance impact while providing real-time notifications for password updates and comprehensive data protection across all Mac OS versions.

What are Jamf Protect's most notable features?

Quick OS Updates: Ensures devices are always up-to-date with the latest OS releases.
Zero Performance Impact: Doesn’t strain CPU resources, ensuring smooth laptop performance.
Real-time Notifications: Delivers timely alerts about password updates and security threats.
Comprehensive Data Protection: Guards against malware, data transfers, and external drive threats.
Zero-touch Integration: Simplifies deployment and device management without manual intervention.

What benefits do users see in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Significant reduction in malware and unauthorized data transfer incidents.
Efficiency: Streamlined device management and application deployment save time.
Performance: Lightweight design ensures devices run smoothly without slowing down.
Proactive Threat Detection: Early detection and prevention of potential threats safeguard data integrity.

Industries such as education, healthcare, and finance leverage Jamf Protect to maintain stringent security standards, streamline application deployment, and ensure devices meet compliance requirements. They benefit from real-time threat alerts, comprehensive data protection, and zero-touch integration, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

JAMF

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

June 2026

Free Report: Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,887 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.