Jamf Protect vs Seqrite Endpoint Security comparison

JAMF and Seqrite are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. JAMF is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.4, while Seqrite is ranked #33 with an average rating of 8.0. JAMF holds a 0.9% mindshare in EPP, compared to Seqrite’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of JAMF users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 82% of Seqrite users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Seqrite Endpoint Security and Jamf Protect are both leading solutions in endpoint security management. Seqrite Endpoint Security is considered superior in pricing and support, whereas Jamf Protect stands out for its advanced features and is viewed as worth its higher price by users.

Features: Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive protection mechanisms, including anti-malware, anti-ransomware, and data loss prevention. Jamf Protect is distinguished for its macOS-specific security features, seamless integration with Apple environments, detailed insights, and proactive threat monitoring.

Room for Improvement: Seqrite Endpoint Security needs improvements in system performance impact and interface intuitiveness. Jamf Protect could enhance its offerings with broader cross-platform support and better alerting functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seqrite Endpoint Security has a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support. Jamf Protect is equally praised for deployment simplicity, with notable points for its dedicated macOS support and detailed onboarding processes.

Pricing and ROI: Seqrite Endpoint Security stands out for its cost-effectiveness and robust return on investment. Jamf Protect, despite a higher price point, justifies this with its exceptional macOS security capabilities and long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,034 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jamf Protect is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seqrite Endpoint Security is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.6%
Jamf Protect	0.9%
Seqrite Endpoint Security	1.0%
Other	94.5%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Nick Rudman

Project Manager at Wells Fargo

Security platform has reduced malware risk and has strengthened compliance for macOS endpoints

Jamf Protect provides multiple levels of telemetry collection, allowing me to select how sensitive I want to be on event triggers. Jamf Protect allows me to monitor against specific threat categories aligned to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. In addition to protection, I utilize Jamf Protect to monitor our endpoint compliance with the CIS critical security control baseline. If the environment is predominantly Apple based, Jamf Protect is a strong solution for providing EDR capabilities to endpoints. The detection capabilities are on par with other leading EDR tools, and it integrates well with Jamf MDM. The compliance telemetry, log forwarding, and USB device management included as part of Jamf Protect provide a good return on investment. Jamf Protect has had a positive impact on my organization, as it has been one of the best tools that protects against malware. It offers better detection of malware, reducing downtime and risk to our network by approximately 30 to 50 percent. Implementing it is straightforward, although there can be a steep learning curve in general, especially for less technical users. The competitive pricing included in the business package is great, and compliance with our security standards has been maintained.

Read full review

ManishKumar14

DGM IT at Seth Anandram Jaipuria Group of Educational Institutions

Centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks The solution is centrally managed, easy to configure, and easy to use. It allows you to patch your required reports. The solution provides central deployment, remote deployment,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome. That is pretty much the use of it. What blows your mind is the ability to access your assets remotely and see what is actually going on with them. You can not only see them in a console. You can also react very rapidly to your assets that are compromised."

"It collects and caches and the knowledge of machine learning from different customers to take to the cloud, it makes it better to use for everybody, it allows for quick learning and updates and can, therefore, offer zero-day malware security, and this sharing of metadata helps make the solution very safe."

"The most valuable for us is the correlation feature."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the user interface."

"The solution allows control over the user and his machine through Cortex XDR security policies."

"It can automatically correlate events and logs, which is very helpful for an IT administrator. It can correlate different kinds of malware activities over a network, agent, or host system. You do not need to do it manually. It is a good feature. It is also a user-friendly solution. We have deployed it on the cloud because our space does not provide any flexibility for on-premises deployment, but Palo Alto has added some flexibility to install it on-premises. It must be like the same Cortex XDR agent for all the VPN services, web filtering services, and everything else."

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

"My advice for others looking into using Cortex is that it is very easy to use and very useful for the customer environment, whether it's a public or private one."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"The tool's tech support is helpful and efficient. It also has an active community."

"Jamf Protect's most effective features for threat detection include managing devices and applications, deploying and upgrading the OS, and its overall security features."

"Jamf Protect is a security product that helps us with CIS benchmarks and threat prevention."

"The product's initial setup phase has very simple steps."

"The features I find most valuable in Jamf Protect are amazing because any malware or any viruses can harm the entire fleet, and Jamf Protect takes action and protects against any alerts, and we are safe from any viruses and any attacks from the entire world."

"My advice for others looking into using Jamf Protect is that it is an excellent tool to use to secure your devices, so I would recommend moving forward with it."

"We mainly use Jamf Protect to protect staff computers from malware and antivirus."

More Jamf Protect pros

"Endpoint Security's best features are inventory, asset management, and quick scanning."

"The two valuable features are anti-ransomware and data loss protection."

"The only thing that I have found useful is that I have an overview of my systems in the networks."

"There are many features available in this solution, such as asset management."

"The solution is stable."

"We were excited about the cloud-based management features of Seqrite and were looking to use the same."

"The setup process was easy for our remote clients and us as well."

"We found the DLP to be innovative and useful."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pros

Cons

"Previously, the endpoint would leave the environment, not being on our VPN, essentially unable to interact with the server to upload files. It was unable to retrieve new file verdicts. It was using a thing called "local analysis" to determine if something was a malicious file or not. There was no dynamic analysis."

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"Cortex XDR could be improved with more GUI features."

"As an improvement, I would like to see enhanced connection speeds."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"It would be good if they could make an exception for applications."

"It is not easy to sell Cortex XDR, not because it isn't a good tool. Its marketing needs to be improved."

"There's an overall lack of features."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The dependency on Jamf Pro or SIEM or SOAR for some automations and integrations could be reduced."

"To improve Jamf Protect, I suggest enhancing the end user onboarding user experience, expanding out-of-the-box support for additional SIEMs, and noting that the user interface takes some getting used to."

"The scope of improvement will fall under the support hierarchy that the tool offers to the latest version that Apple derives for any of the latest operating systems to launch."

"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Beginners need initial training."

"The solution’s stability could be improved."

"Regarding improvements for Jamf Protect, I receive the warnings related to insecure website accesses through mail at a later stage, so if they could be flagged the moment I visit them, that would be great because I would know exactly which website was causing the warnings."

"The customer service rating is four out of ten."

More Jamf Protect cons

"Endpoint Security would be improved by adding DLP."

"The solution could improve by providing better security and a cloud base version."

"User management is not that good currently, and so we have trouble with handling user management."

"The solution needs to improve stability."

"The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved."

"The cost of the solution can be improved."

"Deployment of Seqrite Endpoint Security is generally straightforward. The only complexity we encounter is that, since it is cloud-based, there can be delays in updating the endpoint's status."

"The solution could integrate with other products to provide a comprehensive protection strategy."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"This is an expensive solution."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product price as a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price."

"The licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"Jamf Protect is an expensive solution."

"It's significantly cheaper than other options like ApexOne."

"Jamf Protect costs double the price that we were paying before."

"As per the suggestions from one of the experts we know, it is advisable to make a proper comparison with the local vendors instead of solely relying on online prices, which are often higher and quite expensive."

"The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive."

"My company needs to purchase a yearly subscription for the licensing costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security."

"You need to pay for a yearly license for Seqrite Endpoint Security, which is expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The licensing fee is 200 Bangladeshi Taka per client per year."

"I give the cost of the solution a seven out of ten."

"There is no option to refund the money and unfortunately, we bought a three-year license, seeing that Quick Heal is a long-established player in the market."

More Seqrite Endpoint Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

University

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	47
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	51

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jamf Protect?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing have been very effective. Jamf Protect includes a number of features that othe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Jamf Protect?

The first thing I would like to improve is Jamf's technical assessment on any product. When we were talking with Jamf...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Jamf Protect?

I initially started using Jamf Protect for telemetry and auditing purposes. However, because we have other DLP produc...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's pricing is good for us, where it is neither cheap nor expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seqrite Endpoint Security?

The solution's integration capabilities are moderate and could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Seqrite Endpoint Security protects individual machines, servers, and emails against malware, viruses, and spam attacks.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Jamf Protect

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Jamf Protect

Compared 8% of the time

Tanium vs Jamf Protect

Compared 6% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Jamf Protect

Compared 4% of the time

More Jamf Protect Competitors

Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

Intercept X Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Seqrite Endpoint Security

Compared 6% of the time

More Seqrite Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

May 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect

May 2026

Download Jamf Protect product report

Buyer's Guide

Seqrite Endpoint Security

May 2026

Download Seqrite Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Seqrite End Point Security, Seqrite EPS

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Jamf Protect provides comprehensive security for Apple devices, aiding in malware protection, threat prevention, CIS benchmarks, and USB blockages while supporting local accounts and password sync.

Designed for managing Apple devices, Jamf Protect offers robust security features, such as malware detection and prevention, unauthorized data transfer blocks, and enhanced security profiles. It allows seamless deployment and upgrades of applications, coupled with efficient endpoint management. The tool ensures zero performance impact while providing real-time notifications for password updates and comprehensive data protection across all Mac OS versions.

What are Jamf Protect's most notable features?

Quick OS Updates: Ensures devices are always up-to-date with the latest OS releases.
Zero Performance Impact: Doesn’t strain CPU resources, ensuring smooth laptop performance.
Real-time Notifications: Delivers timely alerts about password updates and security threats.
Comprehensive Data Protection: Guards against malware, data transfers, and external drive threats.
Zero-touch Integration: Simplifies deployment and device management without manual intervention.

What benefits do users see in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Significant reduction in malware and unauthorized data transfer incidents.
Efficiency: Streamlined device management and application deployment save time.
Performance: Lightweight design ensures devices run smoothly without slowing down.
Proactive Threat Detection: Early detection and prevention of potential threats safeguard data integrity.

Industries such as education, healthcare, and finance leverage Jamf Protect to maintain stringent security standards, streamline application deployment, and ensure devices meet compliance requirements. They benefit from real-time threat alerts, comprehensive data protection, and zero-touch integration, enhancing overall operational efficiency.

JAMF

Seqrite Endpoint Security provides comprehensive endpoint protection with features like inventory management, antivirus defense, and ransomware prevention. It ensures seamless device and application control, offering centralized management for hybrid environments across Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Seqrite Endpoint Security, known for its centralized management system, is designed to safeguard endpoints with advanced antivirus, malware detection, and ransomware prevention capabilities. It facilitates effective governance for hybrid work environments, providing robust inventory and asset management. While offering advanced device and application control across Windows, Mac, and Linux, Seqrite integrates XDR and EDR functionalities along with web protection and policy implementation.

What are the key features of Seqrite Endpoint Security?

Inventory and Asset Management: Track and manage hardware and software assets effectively.
Ransomware Backup: Provides backups to secure data against ransomware attacks.
Advanced EDR and XDR: Offers extended and endpoint detection and response.
File Monitoring: Monitors file activities to ensure data integrity.
External Device Control: Manages device usage and access.
Web Protection: Safeguards against online threats with secure browsing.
DLP Features: Monitors data access and usage to prevent data loss.

What benefits should be looked for?

Ease of Management: Streamlined management with a user-friendly interface.
Policy Implementation: Fast and effective application of security policies.
Cost-Effective Plans: Provides affordable options for varied businesses.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of multiple devices.

In industries like IT, healthcare, and finance, Seqrite Endpoint Security finds usage for securing endpoint devices and ensuring compliance with industry standards. Its centralized cloud-based management supports robust access control and governance, suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises in managing endpoint security challenges.

Seqrite

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Gadre, Bharat Vikas Group, Fernandez Hospital, Fabtech Projects & Engineering, KIMS Hospital, National Steel And Agro Industries, Sardar Patel University, Sterling Wilson, Chowgule Industries

Buyer's Guide

Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

April 2026

Free Report: Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jamf Protect vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.