Ixia Hawkeye vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #85, while OpenText is ranked #60 with an average rating of 8.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

1,227 Views
822 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Network Operations...

Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews

806 Views
637 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

OpenText Network Operations...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Ixia Hawkeye and OpenText Network Operations Management are in competition within the network monitoring solutions category. OpenText Network Operations Management has a slight advantage due to its comprehensive features despite its higher cost.

Features: Ixia Hawkeye provides real-time network visibility, predictive analytics, and streamlined deployment which are essential for maintenance and performance optimization. OpenText Network Operations Management offers in-depth monitoring, advanced automation, and detailed reporting that cater well to complex network environments.

Room for Improvement: Ixia Hawkeye could improve by expanding its feature set and enhancing its reporting capabilities and automation levels. OpenText Network Operations Management can also focus on simplifying its setup process and reducing its cost, as well as optimizing their support service to cater to customized needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia Hawkeye delivers a straightforward deployment model with efficient customer service, ensuring minimal disruptions. OpenText Network Operations Management offers reliable support but might require a more intricate deployment process due to its vast features.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia Hawkeye is cost-effective with a low setup cost, appealing for budget-constrained organizations by reducing operational costs and ensuring quick ROI. OpenText, despite demanding a higher initial investment, justifies this with its extensive functionalities and returns through efficiency improvements.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

85th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (66th)

OpenText Network Operations...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Management Applications (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Network Operations Management	0.3%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.4%
Other	99.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

AhmedBahgat

Advisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable

The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"I would recommend Ixia Hawkeye because there are some KPIs that are very useful."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"So far, this product is doing exactly what it is promised to do."

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."

"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."

Cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"It may need a more customizable UI."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure."

"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."

"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The price is reasonable based on the agreement.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?

I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 13% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 13% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 9% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 34% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 29% of the time

ThousandEyes vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs OpenText Network Operations Management

Compared 15% of the time

More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Management Applications

March 2026

OpenText Network Operations Management report

Download OpenText Network Operations Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus Network Operations Management

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText

Sample Customers

EMA

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

March 2026

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.