Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Ixia Hawkeye vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Keysight Technologies and OpenText are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #34 with an average rating of 10.0, while OpenText is ranked #61 with an average rating of 8.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to OpenText’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Ixia Hawkeye
Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews
  • 433 Views
  • 287 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Network Operations...
Read 3 OpenText Network Operations Management reviews
  • 266 Views
  • 129 Comparison Views
75% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Ixia Hawkeye and OpenText Network Operations Management are in competition within the network monitoring solutions category. OpenText Network Operations Management has a slight advantage due to its comprehensive features despite its higher cost.

Features: Ixia Hawkeye provides real-time network visibility, predictive analytics, and streamlined deployment which are essential for maintenance and performance optimization. OpenText Network Operations Management offers in-depth monitoring, advanced automation, and detailed reporting that cater well to complex network environments.

Room for Improvement: Ixia Hawkeye could improve by expanding its feature set and enhancing its reporting capabilities and automation levels. OpenText Network Operations Management can also focus on simplifying its setup process and reducing its cost, as well as optimizing their support service to cater to customized needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia Hawkeye delivers a straightforward deployment model with efficient customer service, ensuring minimal disruptions. OpenText Network Operations Management offers reliable support but might require a more intricate deployment process due to its vast features.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia Hawkeye is cost-effective with a low setup cost, appealing for budget-constrained organizations by reducing operational costs and ensuring quick ROI. OpenText, despite demanding a higher initial investment, justifies this with its extensive functionalities and returns through efficiency improvements.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,491 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
34th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Unified Communications Monitoring (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (36th)
OpenText Network Operations...
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
61st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Network Management Applications (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Network Operations Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez - PeerSpot reviewer
A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting
Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.
Read full review
AhmedBahgat - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic discovery and effective network topology make IT monitoring valuable
The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine. It covers the entire span of the infrastructure, including servers and network operations. It also adapts well to different environments, showing network topology effectively, making the network monitoring tool quite valuable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."
"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."
"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."
"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
"The solution enables dynamic discovery and incorporates a powerful configuration management database, CMDB, along with a strong correlation engine."
 

Cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."
"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."
"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."
"Improvements in network performance are essential."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
"The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."
"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."
"Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?
It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?
Improvements in network performance are essential.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?
Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The price is reasonable based on the agreement.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
The user interface is outdated and needs improvement, especially for service and topology maps. The ease of generating dashboards for different situations by users is critical for my environment. I...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Network Operations Management?
I use the solution as the main vehicle to monitor and alert about events in the IT environment. I use it for IT monitoring.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 32% of the time
ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 29% of the time
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 24% of the time
SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye Logo
SolarWinds NPM vs Ixia Hawkeye
Compared 14% of the time
More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management Logo
ManageEngine OpManager vs OpenText Network Operations Management
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Network Operations Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Network Monitoring Software
April 2025
Ixia Hawkeye reportDownload Ixia Hawkeye product report
Buyer's Guide
Network Management Applications
April 2025
OpenText Network Operations Management reportDownload OpenText Network Operations Management product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Network Operations Management
 

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.
Keysight Technologies

Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

EMA
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
April 2025
Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management
Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. OpenText Network Operations Management report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.