Ixia Hawkeye vs Nagios Core comparison

Keysight Technologies and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #34 with an average rating of 10.0, while Nagios is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.2. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

433 Views
287 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,161 Views
3,242 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Ixia Hawkeye and Nagios Core compete in network monitoring solutions. Ixia Hawkeye seems to have the upper hand with advanced features and customer support, while Nagios Core offers cost-effectiveness and customization.

Features: Ixia Hawkeye provides real-time network performance monitoring, comprehensive diagnostics, and proactive issue detection, making it suitable for complex environments. Nagios Core leverages open-source flexibility, extensive plugin options, and customizable monitoring scenarios for adaptable solutions.

Room for Improvement: Ixia Hawkeye could enhance cost accessibility, expand its support channels, and streamline complex integration processes. Nagios Core may improve its deployment documentation, structured customer service, and user interface for a better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia Hawkeye is known for intuitive deployment with comprehensive support options, facilitating streamlined setup. Nagios Core offers a manual deployment approach, relying on community-driven support, suitable for technically capable teams.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia Hawkeye involves higher initial costs but targets significant ROI through operational efficiency and proactive maintenance. Nagios Core is cost-efficient with low setup costs and promises favorable ROI for budget-focused organizations prioritizing customization and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

34th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

36th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (4th)

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.0%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"I like that it's very simple to install, easy to manage and deploy, and easy to use for monitoring."

"The application performance monitoring feature is valuable."

"I would rate the overall solution ten points out of ten."

"I like the way the solution sends alerts and how it keeps on escalating them."

"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."

"Dashboard provides monitor of total assets."

"It is fairly easy to set up, and we can monitor pretty much everything we want to."

"The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"Nagios Core could improve by adding a user interface. If you want the user interface you have to use Nagios XI."

"It is a bit slow due to latency."

"The UI is a little outdated and graphics could be displayed in a better way."

"I believe Nagios Core will need to provide an option for big data platforms in the future."

"The core version is no match for the XI version."

"It's not that easy to install the product itself. Also, the UI is a bit hard for regular users to navigate through."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"The Nagios Core (PNP4Nagios + Core) is free and can be setup by Netadmin within a few hours. The only additional cost is the cloud server."

"The solution is expensive."

"It's free."

"Most the plugin features are free."

"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"We are using the free version."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Ixia Hawkeye?

It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ixia Hawkeye?

Improvements in network performance are essential.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ixia Hawkeye?

Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this, v...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 37% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 34% of the time

Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 28% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 26% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 14% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 9% of the time

OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core

Compared 4% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

April 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

EMA

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core

April 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.