Ixia Hawkeye vs Nagios Core comparison

Keysight Technologies and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #83, while Nagios is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.7. Keysight Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Ixia Hawkeye

Read 4 Ixia Hawkeye reviews

1,047 Views
691 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,463 Views
3,749 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Ixia Hawkeye

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Ixia Hawkeye and Nagios Core compete in network monitoring solutions. Ixia Hawkeye seems to have the upper hand with advanced features and customer support, while Nagios Core offers cost-effectiveness and customization.

Features: Ixia Hawkeye provides real-time network performance monitoring, comprehensive diagnostics, and proactive issue detection, making it suitable for complex environments. Nagios Core leverages open-source flexibility, extensive plugin options, and customizable monitoring scenarios for adaptable solutions.

Room for Improvement: Ixia Hawkeye could enhance cost accessibility, expand its support channels, and streamline complex integration processes. Nagios Core may improve its deployment documentation, structured customer service, and user interface for a better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ixia Hawkeye is known for intuitive deployment with comprehensive support options, facilitating streamlined setup. Nagios Core offers a manual deployment approach, relying on community-driven support, suitable for technically capable teams.

Pricing and ROI: Ixia Hawkeye involves higher initial costs but targets significant ROI through operational efficiency and proactive maintenance. Nagios Core is cost-efficient with low setup costs and promises favorable ROI for budget-focused organizations prioritizing customization and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ixia Hawkeye

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

83rd

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

63rd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (6th)

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

10th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Ixia Hawkeye is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 1.9%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nagios Core	1.9%
Ixia Hawkeye	0.5%
Other	97.6%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

José Enrique Cano Rodriguez

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting

Distinguishing itself from network management systems like SolarWinds Orion and Dataminer, Hawkeye offers a distinctive feature. It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games. In contrast, SolarWinds and Dataminer typically offer a more general evaluation of network health. Hawkeye's unique capability enables a detailed analysis of network performance through specific tests, allowing administrators to identify areas in need of improvement and take precise actions to enhance network performance.

Read full review

Husham Yaqoob

Senior System Administrator at Interactive Group

Monitoring solution provides comprehensive visibility across IT infrastructure

The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything. Everything in the IT domain, you can monitor anything. You can even monitor printers, the ports of printers, Core workstations, and storage. You can monitor the workflow Core and the utilization of computes. If you want to grasp everything of your IT equipment on a single interface, you can use Nagios. It's the best one. It provides dashboards, and you can also configure your emails and alerts with it. If something is critical, you can configure it to notify via emails. It has a very handy dashboard, providing live alerts and visibility for everything.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

"The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network."

"Our customer was happiest with the price of this product."

"Nagios Core is very configurable. Whatever you want, you can do it."

"The most valuable feature is the performance parameters of the system."

"Monitoring with Nagios Core is helpful because it provides immediate alerts if something goes down, such as a server, or wireless router, or if there's a cable break. This allows us to respond promptly to any issues."

"Nagios Core integrates with tools like Splunk, Datadog, or Dynatrace. It is usually used as a feed to provide more technical information about devices or hosts to another system."

"Our customers like that Nagios Core is an open source solution. It can be customized to our customers' specific needs."

"The application performance monitoring feature is valuable."

"The most valuable feature depends on the project. It's great if you need to check to ensure a service is running 24/7. I can use the full solution for free, and it's flexible. If I need to add a dashboard, I can integrate it with Nagios. Cloud synchronization is wonderful."

"The good thing about Nagios Core is it covers everything."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"The customization of tests and even the results can be improved."

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report."

"Improvements in network performance are essential."

"Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

"It is a bit slow due to latency."

"Bandwidth monitoring is the pain point for me because Nagios Core does not monitor bandwidth effectively like Cacti does."

"Nagios Core does not have a graphic display."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"The scalability needs improvement, it's not scalable at this time."

"The interface could be improved."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"Nagios Core is limited in terms of distributed setups, and there is no central view for remote data centers."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."

"In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."

"Nagios Core is an open source solution, and there are no licensing fees."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"It's free."

"The enterprise version has technical support. The version we are using is free."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"We are using the free version."

"It's free."

"Nagios Core is free to use."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

University

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nagios Core?

I was a senior system administrator. I've been using Nagios Core for more than ten years now. It can be used to monitor hosts, such as machines, and monitor services of any kind. I'm using it to mo...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 15% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 13% of the time

Aurea CX Monitor vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 12% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 11% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Ixia Hawkeye

Compared 11% of the time

More Ixia Hawkeye Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 11% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 8% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 8% of the time

LibreNMS vs Nagios Core

Compared 6% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Ixia Hawkeye product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

January 2026

Download Nagios Core product report

Overview

Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.

Keysight Technologies

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

EMA

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core

December 2025

Free Report: Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ixia Hawkeye vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.