We performed a comparison between INTELLIBOT and Nintex RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There's a helpful community available through the portal."
"It is a stable product. We have been using it for 15 months now, and there have been no issues."
"The replay of the automation is an awesome feature."
"For machine learning, there is an in-built document and text classification feature in INTELLIBOT. That is unlike other RPA tools where one needs to procure a separate license. Besides this, the application is easy to use. One valuable feature is the drag-and-drop feature for AI and email intelligence. It is easier than using UiPath's IQ bot."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the straightforward visual editor, it has close to no code required. It allowed us to deploy the email monitoring in this couple of weeks."
"The return on investment is pretty good because the license cost is cheaper than other RPA tools in the market."
"This solution is easy to use and requires little coding knowledge."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."
"Nintex RPA doesn't require much coding, and you can drag and drop the activities."
"The first pain point of INTELLIBOT was with the development. Whenever the company developed any command, they published it directly onto their SQL site, and our current automation got auto-updated. The second pain point was with the action set. It could be stronger. Moreover, if I am doing UiPath automation, I have to do it with the Internal Report for now."
"I would like to see the cognitive marketing platform improved."
"The trigger actions need to be more robust."
"Currently, there are not many documents available on Google that explain each activity and how to use it or how to use the parameters and pass values."
"A couple of times, we noticed that some bugs caused the bot to go in the wrong flow."
"Has limited functionality and uses extensive resources."
"The solution is heavily dependant on scripts, such as JavaScript or any other external script that needs to be a part of the system. If they want to grow, the scripting dependency should go away. They should have built-in libraries to pull in work from."
"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."
"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."
"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."
INTELLIBOT is ranked 18th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews while Nintex RPA is ranked 28th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews. INTELLIBOT is rated 7.0, while Nintex RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of INTELLIBOT writes "Great studio, offers easy access for clients, and has a helpful community for troubleshooting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex RPA writes "Helps automate tasks and increases efficiency but does stop working sometimes". INTELLIBOT is most compared with UiPath, whereas Nintex RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Kryon RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our INTELLIBOT vs. Nintex RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
