Infraon IMS vs Nagios Core comparison

EverestIMS and Nagios are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. EverestIMS is ranked #87, while Nagios is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. EverestIMS holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nagios’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Nagios users who would recommend it.

Infraon IMS

Read 8 Infraon IMS reviews

595 Views
357 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nagios Core

Read 51 Nagios Core reviews

4,590 Views
4,039 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Infraon IMS

Nagios Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Nagios Core and Infraon IMS are two prominent competitors in network monitoring solutions. While Nagios Core offers free open-source features focusing on infrastructure flexibility, Infraon IMS provides a more feature-rich experience with comprehensive capabilities valuable for larger enterprises.

Features: Nagios Core is known for its open-source flexibility, custom monitoring solutions via plugins and add-ons, and its ability to monitor servers and services without heavy resource usage. Infraon IMS offers the integration of multiple network devices, user-friendly customization, and enhanced alerting and reporting efficiency.

Room for Improvement: Nagios Core's customizability can lead to complexity, requiring manual configuration and extensive system knowledge. Its interface could benefit from modernization. Infraon IMS could improve graphical topology views and incorporate more AI-driven predictive analytics for network issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nagios Core offers versatile deployment options but relies on community support. Its adaptability is proven in open-source environments. Infraon IMS provides similar deployment flexibility with the advantage of comprehensive technical support and managed services.

Pricing and ROI: Nagios Core is a free open-source tool with no licensing fees, appealing to small to medium-sized businesses for its cost efficiency. Infraon IMS has a structured pricing model based on features and devices, catering to enterprises seeking advanced monitoring solutions at a higher cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon IMS vs. Nagios Core Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. Nagios Core

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Infraon IMS

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

87th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

59th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (30th), Cloud Monitoring Software (46th)

Nagios Core

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

10th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Infraon IMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nagios Core is 2.8%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Maharajan S

VSO at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Provides data accuracy for availability and policy harmonization

The reporting capabilities are a challenge and could be improved. We have been trying to connect to it from our help desk ticketing system, because the ticketing system manages asset tracking, which has been a bit challenging for us. Otherwise, they give some reports that are okay, but we do not use them much because we work in the dashboard. This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure. I can take the report and show it to them from a compliance point of view. However, the moment we go to a SaaS model, I don't have control of the data and where the data is stored. I don't receive any complaints-based reports from the SaaS model.

Read full review

Nishith-Vyas

Tech Lead at STL Digital Limited

Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements

The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The backup, restore, and comparison features are all good."

"The feature that I like the most and the best part is the customization."

"We use the solution to automatically trigger processes to help us resolve issues. The whole IT process has been automated, such as trying to map all the users and the escalation process. So, if any issue happens, we get an SMS and WhatsApp of the report. If there is a critical issue this has to be sorted out, like the entire data center being down, then there is an alarm."

"Our response time is within 30 minutes for any support. This solution provides alerts immediately, so we are within our SLA, giving efficiency to our support."

"The role-based dashboards provide data points and charts and topology diagrams in a single window. It's like a spider web, where the application, connectivity, and everything is defined for each user of those applications."

"Their discovery is very quick and they have a CSV file upload mechanism that allows you to onboard five thousand devices a day."

"The most valuable feature is alerting. We get email alerts when a link is down that tell us which device is having a problem."

"It is a stable product. After the initial configuration, you don't have to tweak it much. All systems of Everest IMS work perfectly."

"The solution is quite efficient."

"The most valuable feature is the performance parameters of the system."

"Alert calls occur anytime a service goes down or a matrix is difficult and that helps us to quickly restore service and transfer work."

"The reporting structure and the feature set are valuable to me."

"The most valuable features are the reports and the way it generates the report in a graphical manner."

"What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services."

"The application performance monitoring feature is valuable."

"Monitoring with Nagios Core is helpful because it provides immediate alerts if something goes down, such as a server, or wireless router, or if there's a cable break. This allows us to respond promptly to any issues."

More Nagios Core pros

Cons

"We have enquired if there are any possibilities of monitoring non-IPBS devices."

"The GUI is in need of improvement. It is not drag-and-drop or easy to use."

"Email support is a bit slow. Once you drop an email, it takes time."

"I would like to see an integrated view of Infraon IMS and Infraon Desk. It would be very helpful if that were integrated into the solution."

"This solution is available in SaaS. The reason why we have not gone to SaaS is they do not have a country-specific separation of assets. There are GDPR and other requirements that might require country-specific sensitive information to be filtered as well as other things that need to be taken care of. Normally, if we need to do any compliance, like ISO27000 compliance, they don't have such a report within their system. This kind of report is missing from their SaaS. That is one of the reasons that we have gone to the on-prem version, where I am assured that my data is secure."

"There might be some features in other products that are currently not there in Everest IMS and can be included. I have not yet compared it with any other product."

"I would like to have the option to add a new device or meet with the next release. Right now, it needs to be done from the backend which results in a heavy reliance on R&D."

"The graphical view of the topology does not show us all of the connectivity in our network, which is something that could be improved."

"Nagios Core can improve the graphical interface, it would make things a little easier."

"The mapping is a little hard."

"The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak."

"The tool needs to improve the integrations."

"Cloud monitoring is an area for improvement because there aren't too many plugins available."

"There is room for improvement in the graphics."

"Nagios Core does not have a graphic display."

"It's not that easy to install the product itself. Also, the UI is a bit hard for regular users to navigate through."

More Nagios Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is calculated on a per-user basis."

"The pricing is reasonable, given the features that they provide."

"The cost model is within our budget. I have less than 180 critical assets, but the moment that I have 1,000 assets, then the license model is totally different. I don't know whether they are capable of handling that kind of a load. They could revisit the licensing model."

"If you are looking for the best product with the best price, Infraon is the best product. We evaluated five to six products and finally felt Infraon was better because of the pricing model, especially because it was more flexible."

"I think that the pricing for this solution is reasonable and varies by number of devices."

"We pay for a number of devices on the accounts and since it is on-premises, we pay the maintenance charges for the year."

"We have saved a lot of time, money, and effort in reducing disaster times, which is owed to Nagios quick alerting."

"We are using the free version of Nagios Core."

"The solution is expensive."

"We are using the open-source, unpaid version."

"Lessening the price point would be an improvement."

"We are using the free version."

"The product is cheaply priced."

"It's free."

More Nagios Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nagios Core?

What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?

Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nagios Core?

The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Infraon IMS

Compared 41% of the time

Equinix IBX SmartView vs Infraon IMS

Compared 35% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs Infraon IMS

Compared 24% of the time

More Infraon IMS Competitors

Icinga vs Nagios Core

Compared 25% of the time

Nagios XI vs Nagios Core

Compared 16% of the time

Zabbix vs Nagios Core

Compared 12% of the time

Centreon vs Nagios Core

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Nagios Core

Compared 5% of the time

More Nagios Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS

July 2025

Download Infraon IMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Nagios Core

June 2025

Download Nagios Core product report

Also Known As

Everest IMS

No data available

Overview

Infraon IMS is used for monitoring network status, managing critical IT infrastructure, and ensuring connectivity. It helps organizations automate processes, gain network insights, and manage firewalls in private and cloud environments.

Infraon IMS is designed to assist in monitoring leased lines, switches, data center services, and devices across different environments. It provides alerts, manages assets, supports ITSM rules, and handles ticketing and incident management. With its comprehensive reporting on uptime, downtime, and memory utilization, Infraon IMS delivers detailed insights facilitating efficient infrastructure management. The platform integrates seamlessly with various systems and simplifies operations through real-time network monitoring, customizable reports, and a role-based access control system.

What are Infraon IMS's key features?

Stable Performance: Ensures reliability and efficiency in monitoring and management tasks.
Ease of Customization: Allows adjustments to meet specific requirements.
Real-Time Dashboards: Enhances usability for non-technical users through intuitive interfaces.
Role-Based Access: Facilitates secure, controlled management.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines operations with various platforms.
Alerting Mechanisms: Improves incident response with timely notifications.
Workflow Automation: Simplifies and accelerates routine processes.
Graphical User Interface: Increases user-friendliness and insight accessibility.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Automated Processes: Reduces manual effort, increasing efficiency.
Network Insights: Provides detailed data for proactive management.
Comprehensive Reporting: Delivers valuable information for decision-making.
Enhanced Security: Manages firewalls and links to ensure robust security.

Infraon IMS is implemented across diverse industries to manage and monitor IT infrastructures, from small to large-scale environments. It is especially beneficial in sectors needing reliable connectivity and efficient incident management, such as telecommunications, finance, and cloud service providers. The platform aids these industries in maintaining operational continuity and optimizing resource allocation.

EverestIMS

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Sample Customers

Airtel, BSNL, BlackBox Corporation, ACT, Geojit, Canara Bank, Federal Bank, Corporation Bank, Birla Corporation, CESC Limited, Mphasis, GAIL, Udaan, Cowrks, SEBI, PowerGrid, ION, Summit Communications, National Information Technology Center (Nepal), Bhutan National Bank, Servion T, Greenlam, Translab Technologies, CMSIT Services, Nelco, HPCL, Navitas Life Sciences etc.

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel

Buyer's Guide

Infraon IMS vs. Nagios Core

July 2025

Free Report: Infraon IMS vs. Nagios Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon IMS vs. Nagios Core and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon IMS vs. Nagios Core report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.