Infraon Desk vs JIRA Service Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

EverestIMS and Atlassian are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. EverestIMS is ranked #29, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

JIRA Service Management and Infraon Desk compete in IT service management. JIRA Service Management is ideal for larger organizations with its scalability and extensive integrations, whereas Infraon Desk offers simplicity and efficient support, making it suitable for smaller businesses.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers advanced automation, detailed analytics, and extensive integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex projects. Infraon Desk provides an intuitive platform, efficient ticket handling, and a simplified interface, catering to organizations with less complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management supports both cloud-based and on-premises deployment, allowing seamless scaling, but its customer service can have longer response times. Infraon Desk is primarily cloud-based with quick installation and responsive customer service, beneficial for fast-paced environments.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management's pricing is substantial, aligning with its capabilities, offering high ROI when fully utilized. Infraon Desk is more affordable with lower setup costs, ensuring budget-constrained businesses can effectively manage services, providing considerable ROI for cost-efficient small enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,994 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer1621719

IT Service Delivery at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customizable, easy to manage using a single dashboard, but the features in my version are quite basic

Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me. The customization took longer than I expected to complete, although it may be the team that I was interacting with. They might not have had enough manpower in place. If enough resources are available then the customization is easy. All of the information that I need for monitoring the entire platform is available on a single dashboard. This is very helpful with respect to managing. The multi-channel ticketing options that this solution provides are very important to us because it's all about how we engage with our customers and what options we offer for them to communicate with us. Nowadays, there are many collaborative platforms and many methods for ticket logging. Every system of this type should be flexible enough to provide a mobile app, at least for Android and iOS, and not be confined to using Windows alone. Similarly, self-service portals as well as integration with Slack, as this product has, are important options that many people use.

Read full review

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If we talk about the automation RPA, it definitely has worked very well for us, giving good savings of more than 180 FTEs after implementing more than 200 plus bots."

"We have more than 50 bots in the company, the FTE and ROI are very good, and in the future we have many projects in pipeline that we are about to implement, so definitely there is a good ROI and FTE savings for us."

"I'd say the most impactful and heavily or commonly used ability of v11 and A2019 has been the ability to integrate other code types and operations within the process."

"The impact on efficiency from Document Automation is significant, as it has given us approximately 70 to 80 percent of savings, with almost close to 90 percent efficiency and cost savings of approximately 70 to 80 percent of an FTE per person."

"Overall, this is a great tool because it's easy to maintain and it can reduce hiring costs, leading to reduced overall costs in the future."

"Because it reduced the time duration of our processes, our costs went down."

"The overall UI of the tool is so user-friendly that even a beginner can use it easily."

"The feature we found to be the most valuable is the documentation automation as it allows us to focus on the actual important piece of building automation instead of tracking some of the repugnant documentation that goes along with building automation."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"There are a few dashboards and they are helpful because, in our organization, we have different groups of people who need different kinds of dashboards... as head of network operations, I need a top-level view. I want to see how many calls are open and how many calls are pending, on average, and some trend analysis. Whereas a manager in my team might like to see slightly more detail."

"Infraon Desk was the best choice for my budget, considering the features and customization that I wanted."

"It is meeting our requirements and we are very happy and satisfied with the services of Infraon Desk."

"Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me."

"One of the best things about JIRA is that it searches for answers while questions are being typed so some tickets do not need to be submitted."

"We previously used ITAM, BMC Remedy and some other tools, and JIRA Service Management is comparatively better."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"I think that people should really go for it because of its ease of use."

"Allows customized processes for our service contracts."

"I can see that JIRA avoids chaos and makes the whole company work more efficient as all feature requests and internal/external requests are all visible in the JIRA tickets and the Confluence wiki system."

"We can track, monitor, and get all the details we need from the end-user's point of view for any service request."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

More JIRA Service Management pros

Cons

"I just came to understand that there is a cloud attached to it. I would like to see how the cloud is going to work, because every application is coming out with a cloud version. If you are not on-premise, then you will need to have Citrix automation."

"Debugging can be particularly tricky; identifying the exact reasons for bot failures can be time-consuming."

"We are at an inflection point where we have automated so much that just keeping the lights on certainly takes 20% to 50% of the time, depending on the time of year. Being able to enable the stakeholders is one of my main focuses. If we are automating their process, I want them to continue owning that as much as possible. We are just expanding on the bot insights. From a security perspective, there have been some challenges for us getting our customers in there from a role-level security perspective and making sure that they have full access to the control room and their automation after it is automated."

"We have a lot of use cases that depend on certain Java applets, and currently we're not able to leverage the Object Cloning that would speed up our automation designing. So we have to revert to more image recognition-type of designing, and it just takes a long time to get that bot built."

"In Mexico, where our company is based, we face issues regarding obtaining new licenses, as this has to be done through a third-party company."

"The product needs improvements in dealing with remote servers and providing more APIs that will be used with other systems."

"Some of the biggest improvements they can make are with the interface. It can be improved in terms of usability or searching for something. For example, icons are hard to find. Typically, you jump into the search box, but being able to go in and find things quickly with the eye could be very valuable."

"When I post questions, I seldom get answers fast, and when I do, there are inconsistencies with the existing documentation."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"The version that I am using is very basic and I wouldn't say that it has extraordinary services capabilities that I've never seen before."

"The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling. The detailing is not there in the Infraon Desk reports and there are no graphical elements in them. The reporting is slightly weak and needs to be improved."

"Better connectivity and integration with more collaborative platforms would be helpful."

"The deployment can be a bit complex, especially for those who are not technical."

"For us, one of the weaknesses of Service Desk is that we can not check every issue in the queue raised for one product."

"In general, JIRA has no relation to customers or financials. Therefore, marketplace add-ons are needed to make it work for customer-facing systems."

"Technical support is so-so. Some of them are good, some bad."

"From the customer side, it's not friendly used compared to other competitors, like ServiceNow or BMC. It's also not fully ITSM management if you compare it with ServiceNow or BMC. They have a full model of ITSM. In BMC they have TrueSight, they have Discovery, which helps IT to discover IT equipment with a serial number, with the specs, capacity of the server."

"It was complex for us because we had to migrate data from HPSM. We required a consultant to be involved, and even the consultant struggled for some time."

"JIRA Service Management should make reporting easier. I would like something integrated with DevOps tools."

"JSD has some analytics, but it's pretty much basic and simple dashboards. There's no mobile application for JSD. It really would benefit from better implementation with other vendors. We're heavily reliant on some external marketplace applications."

More JIRA Service Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is too high for small-scale groups. The Control Room yearly fee is high, making it difficult to break even."

"I am not sure about the costs, but two Bot Runners and four Bot Creators may cost approximately 1CR."

"The cloud-based version comes at an increased cost, although our clients are happy with the new features and have not complained about the pricing."

"Subscription for Automation Anywhere (AA) is paid yearly."

"Including the AWS setup and everything per license, it costs us around $10,000 on an annual basis. I believe that is pretty reasonable considering the teams that we have."

"We have a three-year contract with Automation Anywhere."

"It is reasonable and affordable. If you consider the tasks that we can get done using this, the pricing is reasonable and affordable."

"Pricing is affordable and I would recommend beginning with the Starter Package."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is reasonable and it was well within my budget."

"The pricing model is very competitive."

"JIRA Service Desk has different pricing as it is based on agents. On average, the price is about $300 per agent."

"I would suggest to always buy licenses through an Atlassian partner, so you can also rely on their expertise."

"On a scale of one to five, where five is a good price and one is high, I would rate this solution as a three. It isn't cheap but it's not ridiculous."

"For the people like us, the lower the price, the better. But when compared to other competitors, I think it's Jira's price is okay."

"I rate Service Management four out of 10 for affordability. The price could be better, especially for companies using more than one Atlassian product. It's suitable for SMBs that can afford it. I don't think there's another tool that's both better and cheaper. All help desk tools are relatively expensive."

"Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."

"I am using the free version, but my clients are paying for it. When they start, they evaluate it for 30 days, and after seeing the value, they move to its paid version."

"Jira Service Management has affordable license fees. It's $12 a month per person."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	157
Midsize Enterprise	82
Large Enterprise	558

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I als...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

I feel JIRA Service Management could be better if the APIs from the sponsoring team provided more support and flexibi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 12% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

Motadata ServiceOps vs Infraon Desk

Compared 16% of the time

SCSM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 15% of the time

ServiceNow vs Infraon Desk

Compared 7% of the time

SymphonyAI IT Service Management vs Infraon Desk

Compared 6% of the time

Clarity SM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 5% of the time

More Infraon Desk Competitors

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 11% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Atera vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 4% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

September 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Help Desk Software

August 2026

Download Infraon Desk product report

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

August 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Everest Service Manager

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

EverestIMS

Demo not available

Atlassian

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Infraon Desk presents a robust IT service management system designed to optimize business processes through a comprehensive set of features tailored to meet modern IT service demands.

Infraon Desk delivers an advanced ITSM platform that aims to improve IT service management efficiency through automated workflows, customization options, and intuitive design. It helps organizations in managing IT assets and streamlining processes with minimal manual intervention. With capabilities like incident management, change management, and asset tracking, it supports organizations in maintaining a high level of operational efficiency.

What are the key features of Infraon Desk?

Incident Management: Quickly address and resolve incidents to minimize downtime.
Change Management: Control IT changes with structured processes.
Asset Tracking: Efficiently manage IT assets throughout their lifecycle.
Automation: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Custom Reporting: Generate reports to gain insights into IT operations.

What benefits should you look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce IT operational costs with streamlined processes.
Enhanced Productivity: Boost team productivity through automation and process optimization.
Improved SLA Performance: Maintain higher service levels with effective incident and problem management.
Scalability: Easily scale IT services to accommodate business growth.

Infraon Desk serves industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where reliable IT service management is crucial. Its flexible deployment options and adaptability make it a suitable choice across different industry domains, ensuring tailored solutions that align with specific industry requirements.

EverestIMS

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Airtel, BSNL, Cloudnine, D-Vois, Geojit, Indian telco

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

September 2026

Free Report: Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.