Infraon Desk vs JIRA Service Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

EverestIMS and Atlassian are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. EverestIMS is ranked #29, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

JIRA Service Management and Infraon Desk compete in IT service management. JIRA Service Management is ideal for larger organizations with its scalability and extensive integrations, whereas Infraon Desk offers simplicity and efficient support, making it suitable for smaller businesses.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers advanced automation, detailed analytics, and extensive integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex projects. Infraon Desk provides an intuitive platform, efficient ticket handling, and a simplified interface, catering to organizations with less complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management supports both cloud-based and on-premises deployment, allowing seamless scaling, but its customer service can have longer response times. Infraon Desk is primarily cloud-based with quick installation and responsive customer service, beneficial for fast-paced environments.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management's pricing is substantial, aligning with its capabilities, offering high ROI when fully utilized. Infraon Desk is more affordable with lower setup costs, ensuring budget-constrained businesses can effectively manage services, providing considerable ROI for cost-efficient small enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer1621719

IT Service Delivery at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customizable, easy to manage using a single dashboard, but the features in my version are quite basic

Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me. The customization took longer than I expected to complete, although it may be the team that I was interacting with. They might not have had enough manpower in place. If enough resources are available then the customization is easy. All of the information that I need for monitoring the entire platform is available on a single dashboard. This is very helpful with respect to managing. The multi-channel ticketing options that this solution provides are very important to us because it's all about how we engage with our customers and what options we offer for them to communicate with us. Nowadays, there are many collaborative platforms and many methods for ticket logging. Every system of this type should be flexible enough to provide a mobile app, at least for Android and iOS, and not be confined to using Windows alone. Similarly, self-service portals as well as integration with Slack, as this product has, are important options that many people use.

Read full review

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MetaBots are useful when connecting to websites or to forms with objects that need to be captured."

"This solution allows us to more fully automate our clients' specific tools."

"The most valued feature of Automation Anywhere is its Excel functionality; earlier in my career, I used Process Studio as my RPA tool and there was no flexibility of retrieving single cells, but Automation Anywhere has the flexibility to extract data from Excel."

"Automation Anywhere has a great learning curve, and we have automated processes through bots that ease our work by handling repetitive tasks and minimizing effort and work inefficiencies."

"Our workforce has limited capacity, and by adding this solution we can increase the amount of work coming in without adding to our workforce."

"We're able to create reusable components. We don't want people to have to rebuild things from scratch. In this way, developers can take the reusable components and complete their development processes more quickly."

"The code, once developed, is pretty stable."

"The most valuable feature is the SAP application and the DLLs that Automation Anywhere provides. These DLLs help automate the SAP application."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"Infraon Desk was the best choice for my budget, considering the features and customization that I wanted."

"It is meeting our requirements and we are very happy and satisfied with the services of Infraon Desk."

"Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me."

"There are a few dashboards and they are helpful because, in our organization, we have different groups of people who need different kinds of dashboards... as head of network operations, I need a top-level view. I want to see how many calls are open and how many calls are pending, on average, and some trend analysis. Whereas a manager in my team might like to see slightly more detail."

"The solution is easy, even if you want to dock on something, it's easy to add the documentation and it easily integrates with other tools."

"The basic configuration and the basic abilities provided are the most valuable aspects of the solution."

"Everyone knows how to use it, so there's no need to teach new members."

"The product is not lacking anything that a QA will want to use."

"It is 100% stable."

"We previously used ITAM, BMC Remedy and some other tools, and JIRA Service Management is comparatively better."

"I think it's easy to use and user-friendly."

"The solution is scalable; we have currently deployed it to about 35 agents and it will be deployed to around 1200 customers, all of them dealing with creating and resolving tickets."

More JIRA Service Management pros

Cons

"I would like OCR for video and text using the IQ Bot. It should also be available in an email tag format."

"In the next release, once the bot is triggered, the system should always recognize the active state and not prompt the user to log in again before the bot finishes all of its tasks."

"Training is good and interactive but the final certification exam is very tough and it requires in-depth practical knowledge."

"IQ Bot is pretty good, but we can only run a maximum 150 documents."

"One area that Automation Anywhere can improve is the debugging experience."

"I am looking for artificial intelligence and machine learning. I hope that they introduce them in A2019."

"The integration is not always seamless. Sometimes, it takes a while to get everything to communicate and be ready to go into production."

"The product falls behind in working with webhooks."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"The version that I am using is very basic and I wouldn't say that it has extraordinary services capabilities that I've never seen before."

"The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling. The detailing is not there in the Infraon Desk reports and there are no graphical elements in them. The reporting is slightly weak and needs to be improved."

"Better connectivity and integration with more collaborative platforms would be helpful."

"This solution lacks features for project management. I would like to see more reports."

"Jira has different modules that can develop workflow for demand management and project management, but the solution is no out of the box and would require lots of customization."

"The product does not have the capability to sort queued tickets by product. This would be useful in making workflows more efficient."

"The interface could always be updated and improved."

"You can use different plug-ins for JIRA Service Desk to add some functionality, but these plug-ins are very expensive."

"I feel that Atlassian isn't really interested in fixing everything because if they did, the partners that are developing the fixes and features would not have a place in the market."

"The platform should be more user-friendly. JIRA's user interface needs training to understand and utilize."

"What needs to be added in Jira Service Management is the user screen. You'll find it very weird if this is your first time using the solution. The user-friendliness of its interface needs improvement."

More JIRA Service Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable and one can achieve ROI faster when compared to other tools."

"Subscription for Automation Anywhere (AA) is paid yearly."

"We save 34,000 hours of time per year and have recouped up to $6000 in lost revenue."

"Automation Anywhere is costlier than the general competition. That is aligned with the share of the market it has."

"Automation Anywhere is reasonably priced because it can sustain us for a long period."

"We purchase on a bot basis. Our costs are approximately $5,000."

"Automation Anywhere is expensive."

"It is expensive. Automation Anywhere has reduced the price slightly, as we have grown. However, the price is still excessive enough that we are engaged in PoCs on other tools."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is reasonable and it was well within my budget."

"The pricing model is very competitive."

"The price of JIRA Service Management could be reduced."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"Costs are about $50 per user per year. JIRA is sold in user tiers of 25, 50, 100, 250, 500, 2000, 10,000, and unlimited users. It is bad when you have 51 users then the price is based on that 100 user tier. Users at 100 will be the most cost effective."

"The license we use is on a yearly basis. As a Solution Partner, we were using the free one and were using the free plugins. We were also giving our own plugins to the Atlassian Solution Partners for free. We don't pay anything to Atlassian."

"The pricing is very competitive and I think that it is okay."

"I am using the free version, but my clients are paying for it. When they start, they evaluate it for 30 days, and after seeing the value, they move to its paid version."

"Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."

"On a scale of one to five, where five is a good price and one is high, I would rate this solution as a three. It isn't cheap but it's not ridiculous."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	162
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	565

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I als...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

I feel JIRA Service Management could be better if the APIs from the sponsoring team provided more support and flexibi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

Motadata ServiceOps vs Infraon Desk

Compared 14% of the time

SCSM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow vs Infraon Desk

Compared 5% of the time

Zendesk vs Infraon Desk

Compared 5% of the time

SymphonyAI IT Service Management vs Infraon Desk

Compared 5% of the time

More Infraon Desk Competitors

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 10% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 4% of the time

Atera vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 4% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

October 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Help Desk Software

October 2026

Download Infraon Desk product report

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

October 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Everest Service Manager

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

EverestIMS

Demo not available

Atlassian

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Infraon Desk presents a robust IT service management system designed to optimize business processes through a comprehensive set of features tailored to meet modern IT service demands.

Infraon Desk delivers an advanced ITSM platform that aims to improve IT service management efficiency through automated workflows, customization options, and intuitive design. It helps organizations in managing IT assets and streamlining processes with minimal manual intervention. With capabilities like incident management, change management, and asset tracking, it supports organizations in maintaining a high level of operational efficiency.

What are the key features of Infraon Desk?

Incident Management: Quickly address and resolve incidents to minimize downtime.
Change Management: Control IT changes with structured processes.
Asset Tracking: Efficiently manage IT assets throughout their lifecycle.
Automation: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Custom Reporting: Generate reports to gain insights into IT operations.

What benefits should you look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce IT operational costs with streamlined processes.
Enhanced Productivity: Boost team productivity through automation and process optimization.
Improved SLA Performance: Maintain higher service levels with effective incident and problem management.
Scalability: Easily scale IT services to accommodate business growth.

Infraon Desk serves industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where reliable IT service management is crucial. Its flexible deployment options and adaptability make it a suitable choice across different industry domains, ensuring tailored solutions that align with specific industry requirements.

EverestIMS

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Airtel, BSNL, Cloudnine, D-Vois, Geojit, Indian telco

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

November 2026

Free Report: Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.