Infraon Desk vs JIRA Service Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?

EverestIMS and Atlassian are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. EverestIMS is ranked #29, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

JIRA Service Management and Infraon Desk compete in IT service management. JIRA Service Management is ideal for larger organizations with its scalability and extensive integrations, whereas Infraon Desk offers simplicity and efficient support, making it suitable for smaller businesses.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers advanced automation, detailed analytics, and extensive integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex projects. Infraon Desk provides an intuitive platform, efficient ticket handling, and a simplified interface, catering to organizations with less complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management supports both cloud-based and on-premises deployment, allowing seamless scaling, but its customer service can have longer response times. Infraon Desk is primarily cloud-based with quick installation and responsive customer service, beneficial for fast-paced environments.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management's pricing is substantial, aligning with its capabilities, offering high ROI when fully utilized. Infraon Desk is more affordable with lower setup costs, ensuring budget-constrained businesses can effectively manage services, providing considerable ROI for cost-efficient small enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,743 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer1621719

IT Service Delivery at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customizable, easy to manage using a single dashboard, but the features in my version are quite basic

Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me. The customization took longer than I expected to complete, although it may be the team that I was interacting with. They might not have had enough manpower in place. If enough resources are available then the customization is easy. All of the information that I need for monitoring the entire platform is available on a single dashboard. This is very helpful with respect to managing. The multi-channel ticketing options that this solution provides are very important to us because it's all about how we engage with our customers and what options we offer for them to communicate with us. Nowadays, there are many collaborative platforms and many methods for ticket logging. Every system of this type should be flexible enough to provide a mobile app, at least for Android and iOS, and not be confined to using Windows alone. Similarly, self-service portals as well as integration with Slack, as this product has, are important options that many people use.

Read full review

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Pulling data from web pages using Object Cloning has been an absolute delight."

"The flexibility which has been built into it is its most valuable feature."

"It has improved the reliability of our monthly billing processes that, in the past, was dependent on manual, nine-to-five types of activities, and we can now schedule those activities, process 24 hours a day, and then we review exceptions."

"It's easy to use for business users. Everything is good. It's a nice product."

"The insights provided by the dashboard are excellent."

"Automation Anywhere is a great tool."

"The most valuable feature of Automation Anywhere is the unattended mode bots, because we don't need to go and look at what they're doing. They just go by themselves."

"It is easy to use and very scalable."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"It is meeting our requirements and we are very happy and satisfied with the services of Infraon Desk."

"Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me."

"There are a few dashboards and they are helpful because, in our organization, we have different groups of people who need different kinds of dashboards... as head of network operations, I need a top-level view. I want to see how many calls are open and how many calls are pending, on average, and some trend analysis. Whereas a manager in my team might like to see slightly more detail."

"Infraon Desk was the best choice for my budget, considering the features and customization that I wanted."

"The visibility features are great."

"It makes the IT department more transparent and helps the employees."

"The stability of JIRA Service Management is good."

"We previously used ITAM, BMC Remedy and some other tools, and JIRA Service Management is comparatively better."

"Compared to other solutions, Jira Service Management is really reasonable regarding price and speed."

"The automation feature in JIRA Service Management is beneficial, and that's yet to be available in ServiceNow. ServiceNow doesn't have the flexibility to automate processes."

"We have an Agile environment and using Jira makes it easy to adhere to Agile best practices."

"Some of the most valuable features are simplicity, ease of configuration, and ease of customization."

More JIRA Service Management pros

Cons

"Automation Anywhere can include database commands like insert row, bold row, etc commands in 11.x"

"However, there is a problem that arises with accuracy in the newer version."

"MetaBots and Control Room may have some room for improvement."

"Integration with secondary environments needs to be improved or enabled."

"It needs stability improvements. Sometimes, it becomes unstable."

"There is definitely some room for improvement there. It is sort of a hit and miss with their support engineers, you have some really good ones and some that aren't."

"For order processing, I would say that it is not very much time-saving because it is also taking time to extract and process, but it is giving us freedom in that the people who are doing the repetitive task are not doing that repetitive task now, and they are doing something else, maybe validation or something more productive."

"I could not say it's a stable product, because when you move in the market, there are many companies are there."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling. The detailing is not there in the Infraon Desk reports and there are no graphical elements in them. The reporting is slightly weak and needs to be improved."

"Better connectivity and integration with more collaborative platforms would be helpful."

"The version that I am using is very basic and I wouldn't say that it has extraordinary services capabilities that I've never seen before."

"The way it handles subtasks can be improved. We would really like the ability to have different types of subtasks."

"It is pretty complex to move between the test environment and the production environment. There is potential for improvement."

"While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I also received support from JIRA support, making it a positive experience."

"At this stage, I would give it a five out of ten. This is mostly because we rely on other products for certain services or features."

"With Jira, we were unable to implement time-based automation in its ticketing system. We would like a feature where we can define tickets based on severity, then tickets are automatically escalated to the next level after a set period of time if they go unanswered."

"The solution needs to be integrated better with Office X5."

"Recently, in the Jira cloud, we have had an issue. Users are not able to log in and some of the customer data has also been lost."

"The main issue with this solution is there's no limited subscription available for plugins we only use for a few people. If we only have a team of twenty using a plugin, we still have to purchase a subscription for the whole 200 users."

More JIRA Service Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As far as costs, it depends on your use. We started with a basic department pack, which is over 10K. The additional costs depend on the scale of the engagement and how it pans out. We customize to our needs on the go."

"In terms of pricing, this is a good product."

"It's fine. However, I'm concerned with the credits in terms of the pricing for the AI models. It is understandable that the new ones are more expensive, but the base models, after doing the pricing conversion, cost about four to ten times as much as paying directly."

"Additional costs will be for the machines and the number of machines that you are using. You can deploy virtually as well as on physical machines. In both the situations, you do need to allocate a certain budget for securing the machines and where the software will be installed and running. The machines cannot be used for anything else, because only a certain bot can run at a certain time. You need to be very particular about your scheduling of running the bots, and while the bot is running nobody can use the machine. You cannot have an agent working on a machine and the bot running in the background. It has to be completely dedicated. Then there are the network bandwidth requirements and space requirements, which are additional costs apart from the licensing and software costs. The developer is also going to charge you for their coding time too."

"Automation Anywhere is affordable."

"Automation Anywhere is cheaper than UiPath and Blue Prism. From a market point of view, Automation Anywhere is reasonable. Any organization can adopt Automation Anywhere."

"We have established a CoE and we take our bot opportunities based on their ROIs. The best ROI opportunity goes to development first. Our ROI opportunities are compliance, profitable growth, productivity enhancements, productivity gains, number of hours the productivity saved, and resources not available that the work can be done by the bot. However, the single most important criteria that we use to measure ROI is how much time does the bot cut down from an analyst's work, as this has the best ROI. E.g., if an analyst is spending a 100 hours of work that a bot can do in one hour, we calculate the 99 hours saved as ROI."

"More than 40 to 50 percent of the IT budget will be for the cost of automation projects in the coming years since these projects enhance operations add value."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"The pricing model is very competitive."

"The price of this solution is reasonable and it was well within my budget."

"This is pricey solution. Should we move to using all cloud solutions in our business, we may move to different tools that have multiple functionality versus having a solution for each area. This would be too pricey and we would need to replace Jira with a different solution that also offers other features."

"We may upgrade the license that we have. The license that we currently have is good for 500 agents, and it's not full yet."

"Jira Service Management has affordable license fees. It's $12 a month per person."

"The price of the solution is becoming expensive and it should be reduced."

"I am using the free version, but my clients are paying for it. When they start, they evaluate it for 30 days, and after seeing the value, they move to its paid version."

"I rate Service Management four out of 10 for affordability. The price could be better, especially for companies using more than one Atlassian product. It's suitable for SMBs that can afford it. I don't think there's another tool that's both better and cheaper. All help desk tools are relatively expensive."

"Do not forget to calculate add-on costs. These cost a percentage of the JIRA purchasing costs and are based on the number of JIRA users."

"But about the plugins, I found one plug-in — its name is Actionable Metric I think — and it is $3000. That is very expensive for users in Iran."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,743 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	161
Midsize Enterprise	86
Large Enterprise	562

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I als...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

I feel JIRA Service Management could be better if the APIs from the sponsoring team provided more support and flexibi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 11% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 4% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

Motadata ServiceOps vs Infraon Desk

Compared 15% of the time

SCSM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow vs Infraon Desk

Compared 6% of the time

SymphonyAI IT Service Management vs Infraon Desk

Compared 6% of the time

Clarity SM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 4% of the time

More Infraon Desk Competitors

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 11% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 6% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

Atera vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 4% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

October 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Help Desk Software

September 2026

Download Infraon Desk product report

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

October 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Everest Service Manager

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

EverestIMS

Demo not available

Atlassian

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Infraon Desk presents a robust IT service management system designed to optimize business processes through a comprehensive set of features tailored to meet modern IT service demands.

Infraon Desk delivers an advanced ITSM platform that aims to improve IT service management efficiency through automated workflows, customization options, and intuitive design. It helps organizations in managing IT assets and streamlining processes with minimal manual intervention. With capabilities like incident management, change management, and asset tracking, it supports organizations in maintaining a high level of operational efficiency.

What are the key features of Infraon Desk?

Incident Management: Quickly address and resolve incidents to minimize downtime.
Change Management: Control IT changes with structured processes.
Asset Tracking: Efficiently manage IT assets throughout their lifecycle.
Automation: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Custom Reporting: Generate reports to gain insights into IT operations.

What benefits should you look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce IT operational costs with streamlined processes.
Enhanced Productivity: Boost team productivity through automation and process optimization.
Improved SLA Performance: Maintain higher service levels with effective incident and problem management.
Scalability: Easily scale IT services to accommodate business growth.

Infraon Desk serves industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where reliable IT service management is crucial. Its flexible deployment options and adaptability make it a suitable choice across different industry domains, ensuring tailored solutions that align with specific industry requirements.

EverestIMS

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Airtel, BSNL, Cloudnine, D-Vois, Geojit, Indian telco

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

September 2026

Free Report: Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,743 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.