Infraon Desk vs JIRA Service Management comparison

EverestIMS and Atlassian are both solutions in the IT Service Management (ITSM) category. EverestIMS is ranked #30, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Additionally, 100% of EverestIMS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

JIRA Service Management and Infraon Desk compete in IT service management. JIRA Service Management is ideal for larger organizations with its scalability and extensive integrations, whereas Infraon Desk offers simplicity and efficient support, making it suitable for smaller businesses.

Features: JIRA Service Management offers advanced automation, detailed analytics, and extensive integration capabilities, making it ideal for complex projects. Infraon Desk provides an intuitive platform, efficient ticket handling, and a simplified interface, catering to organizations with less complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: JIRA Service Management supports both cloud-based and on-premises deployment, allowing seamless scaling, but its customer service can have longer response times. Infraon Desk is primarily cloud-based with quick installation and responsive customer service, beneficial for fast-paced environments.

Pricing and ROI: JIRA Service Management's pricing is substantial, aligning with its capabilities, offering high ROI when fully utilized. Infraon Desk is more affordable with lower setup costs, ensuring budget-constrained businesses can effectively manage services, providing considerable ROI for cost-efficient small enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,387 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer1621719

IT Service Delivery at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customizable, easy to manage using a single dashboard, but the features in my version are quite basic

Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me. The customization took longer than I expected to complete, although it may be the team that I was interacting with. They might not have had enough manpower in place. If enough resources are available then the customization is easy. All of the information that I need for monitoring the entire platform is available on a single dashboard. This is very helpful with respect to managing. The multi-channel ticketing options that this solution provides are very important to us because it's all about how we engage with our customers and what options we offer for them to communicate with us. Nowadays, there are many collaborative platforms and many methods for ticket logging. Every system of this type should be flexible enough to provide a mobile app, at least for Android and iOS, and not be confined to using Windows alone. Similarly, self-service portals as well as integration with Slack, as this product has, are important options that many people use.

Read full review

Sohaib Ahmad

Vice President Service Delivery at quixel

Comprehensive workflows and data views have supported complex teams but still need cost improvements

JIRA Service Management is costly. The pricing structure needs improvement. When I add some plugins, I have to pay the cost for every user whether they are using it or not. For smaller companies, the detailed workflow editing and the kind of details that JIRA Service Management provides would be complex. For startups and smaller companies, JIRA Service Management would be complex. The cloud offering is easier because I don't have to manage the infrastructure. There are two templates of the project: company-managed and team-managed. Team-managed is a newer feature, which is good for startup-kind companies where they don't need control over data from multiple projects displaying in one dashboard. For startups, JIRA Service Management is somewhat complex with its schemes and everything. Capacity management should be improved in terms of additional features in the next release of JIRA Service Management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Many tasks take a long time for a person to do them. Automation Anywhere enables us to do those jobs in less time."

"IQ Bot with the ABBY OCR is a powerful component to do multiple extractions in the shortest possible timeframe in comparison to human execution of similarly identified tasks or operations."

"AA RPA has drastically reduced speed of execution and thus turn around time of processes, ensuring all service level agreements are met and our customers get a great experience."

"I'd say the most impactful and heavily or commonly used ability of v11 and A2019 has been the ability to integrate other code types and operations within the process."

"Using Automation Anywhere has improved our company significantly, as we are doing over eight to 10,000 invoices a month, which people had to do before, while now the automated process is doing that without too much human intervention, saving probably about at least two to possibly three FTEs per week."

"The integrations of Automation Anywhere with the mainframe application for banking companies are among the most valuable features... we were able to create very good solutions integrated with that kind of platform using Automation Anywhere."

"The most valuable feature is its easy to use."

"Automation Anywhere helped multiple clients to save a lot of data entry time and have automated almost every repetitive task, and AA Control Room helped to manage the operations of both attended and unattended automations and have helped a continuous run of the bots saving hundreds of thousands of dollars."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"There are a few dashboards and they are helpful because, in our organization, we have different groups of people who need different kinds of dashboards... as head of network operations, I need a top-level view. I want to see how many calls are open and how many calls are pending, on average, and some trend analysis. Whereas a manager in my team might like to see slightly more detail."

"It is meeting our requirements and we are very happy and satisfied with the services of Infraon Desk."

"Infraon Desk is very flexible in nature and can be customized for my needs. The fact that I can customize it the way I want is the best part of the tool for me."

"Infraon Desk was the best choice for my budget, considering the features and customization that I wanted."

"Some of the most valuable features are simplicity, ease of configuration, and ease of customization."

"Apart from ticket management and workflow, the Kanban board is one of the helpful tools in Jira."

"JIRA Service Management impacts my organization positively because it is easy to use, and everyone is happy to use it."

"This is a flexible tool for logging and tracking issues efficiently."

"The automation feature in JIRA Service Management is beneficial, and that's yet to be available in ServiceNow. ServiceNow doesn't have the flexibility to automate processes."

"Jira lets us customize the workflow to meet our requirements."

"I believe that JIRA is one of the best project management tools."

"The links between the help desk and Jira issues and between Confluence and Jira issues are most valuable. I can write requirements in Confluence and link them to user stories in Jira and test cases. I can see my test coverage and all that kind of stuff. The integration between these three is very useful. It is pretty customizable, and it integrates well. There are a lot of add-ins and a lot of connectors to third-party products. In my last company, we used Test Royal for managing all the tests, and it integrated perfectly with that. For any issue or bug, we could see what tests have been run and the complete history of the tests."

More JIRA Service Management pros

Cons

"We are still looking into some of its current capabilities, like IT Bot."

"If you work with image recognition and custom objects, there are stability issues."

"The biggest challenge in attended automation, every time the agent has to log in to the control room and execute bot for most of the agents this is a time-consuming activity plus they are not tech-savvy."

"One improvement would be to implement a log mechanism within the workflow, similar to other automation tools."

"The human training area is still something that needs to be improved. It's not so much the actual technology learning, but rather how you bring this to life with all the peripheral competencies that are needed for it."

"With Oracle, Blue Prism was easier and a little bit more stable than Automation Anywhere. Even with ServiceNow, the automation was very unreliable. It did not work as expected."

"We would like to have more ease of use for the operations team."

"Bots get disconnected from control rooms sometimes without any reason and this takes up a lot of time."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling. The detailing is not there in the Infraon Desk reports and there are no graphical elements in them. The reporting is slightly weak and needs to be improved."

"The version that I am using is very basic and I wouldn't say that it has extraordinary services capabilities that I've never seen before."

"The reporting is okay, but it doesn't give you reports that make you say "wow," like you might see from a tool like MRTG or PRTG whose reports give you a good feeling."

"Better connectivity and integration with more collaborative platforms would be helpful."

"The solution should be more formalized. It could be more user-friendly."

"It is difficult to navigate if you don't have any prior knowledge."

"Its UI is a bit overwhelming for new users."

"We have a lot of add-ons, however, instead of the add-ons, for example, cloning could be better."

"The initial setup of JIRA Service Management can be complex for new users. There is a lot of configuration."

"I don't think the program is very scalable."

"It should be easier to log in."

"The product could improve its asset management."

More JIRA Service Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is costly and the licensing is very confusing."

"This is a comprehensive automation offering with a scalable architecture and flexible pricing models."

"Automation Anywhere falls within a mid-range price point when compared to other RPA tools on the market."

"The starting price, which is a one-off fee is a bit high and this may deter mid and small-sized companies from acquiring and decide to shun the platform."

"It is somewhere in the middle. The price and value of Automation Anywhere are better than UiPath. The pricing is good globally. It could be a little bit cheaper, but it is good."

"Although the initial implementation cost of Automation Anywhere is relatively high compared to other options, its annual subscription cost is lower than UiPath's, which has the opposite pricing structure."

"The enterprise version is expensive for small businesses and individual users."

"The pricing is a bit higher."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is reasonable and it was well within my budget."

"The pricing model is very competitive."

"This is pricey solution. Should we move to using all cloud solutions in our business, we may move to different tools that have multiple functionality versus having a solution for each area. This would be too pricey and we would need to replace Jira with a different solution that also offers other features."

"It is a cheaply priced product."

"It costs around $150 to $200 per user."

"We have paid $20,000 recently for a one-year license for our on-prem server."

"We need a license because we have a higher number than the free part."

"It is one of the premium products on the market, but it is very costly, especially in the Indian market."

"Right now, there are only two of us who are both agents on the help desk and developers. We might be on the free version because we're less than three agents or users. I'm looking at Zephyr tests, which have a $10 a month flat rate, so right now, it is $10 a month. There are lots of add-ons. They do a free version, a standard version, and a premium version. In the last company, we started on $50 a month. By the time I left, we were paying $4,500 a month. That was mainly because we had 100 users on Confluence. I bought an add-on for Jira software for which we had 10 users, and that was $5 per user per month. It was costing me $500 a month, whereas it should only be $50 a month. I don't know if licensing fee has changed. I'd like our whole company to use it, but the big problem is the licensing because the Confluence side is what is really useful, but if I add 30 users to Confluence and then buy an extension for Jira software, I've got to pay for 30 licenses, even though I've only got two users in Jira software. It is the one big disadvantage of cloud software. You always have to pay for the number of seats regardless of which product you are on. This will probably severely limit how many people would use it because I'm not going to start paying $10 per user per month for a Jira software add-on when there are only two people using it."

"The price for JIRA Service Management is reasonable and cheaper than other ITSM solutions, but the licensing model is different, so you cannot compare it with other solutions. Overall, the pricing for the solution is acceptable."

More JIRA Service Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Service Management (ITSM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,387 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	150
Midsize Enterprise	82
Large Enterprise	531

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	25
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your favorite Help Desk Software and why?

JIRA Due to its agility.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?

While licensing is costly, setting up JIRA Service Management is overall good because the vendor helped me, and I als...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Service Management?

I feel JIRA Service Management could be better if the APIs from the sponsoring team provided more support and flexibi...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 12% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 7% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

WorkFusion vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

Motadata ServiceOps vs Infraon Desk

Compared 22% of the time

SCSM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 14% of the time

SymphonyAI IT Service Management vs Infraon Desk

Compared 9% of the time

ServiceNow vs Infraon Desk

Compared 8% of the time

Clarity SM vs Infraon Desk

Compared 6% of the time

More Infraon Desk Competitors

ServiceNow vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 12% of the time

Zendesk vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix ITSM vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 7% of the time

Freshservice vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs JIRA Service Management

Compared 5% of the time

More JIRA Service Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

May 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Help Desk Software

April 2026

Download Infraon Desk product report

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Service Management

May 2026

Download JIRA Service Management product report

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Everest Service Manager

JIRA Service Desk, Atlassian Jira Service Management

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

EverestIMS

Demo not available

Atlassian

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Infraon Desk presents a robust IT service management system designed to optimize business processes through a comprehensive set of features tailored to meet modern IT service demands.

Infraon Desk delivers an advanced ITSM platform that aims to improve IT service management efficiency through automated workflows, customization options, and intuitive design. It helps organizations in managing IT assets and streamlining processes with minimal manual intervention. With capabilities like incident management, change management, and asset tracking, it supports organizations in maintaining a high level of operational efficiency.

What are the key features of Infraon Desk?

Incident Management: Quickly address and resolve incidents to minimize downtime.
Change Management: Control IT changes with structured processes.
Asset Tracking: Efficiently manage IT assets throughout their lifecycle.
Automation: Automate repetitive tasks to save time and reduce errors.
Custom Reporting: Generate reports to gain insights into IT operations.

What benefits should you look for?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce IT operational costs with streamlined processes.
Enhanced Productivity: Boost team productivity through automation and process optimization.
Improved SLA Performance: Maintain higher service levels with effective incident and problem management.
Scalability: Easily scale IT services to accommodate business growth.

Infraon Desk serves industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where reliable IT service management is crucial. Its flexible deployment options and adaptability make it a suitable choice across different industry domains, ensuring tailored solutions that align with specific industry requirements.

EverestIMS

JIRA Service Management is recognized for customization, ease of use, and integration capabilities, offering flexible workflows and dashboards that enhance ticket management in organizations.

This platform contributes to streamlining business operations with features like automation and real-time updates. Businesses implement JIRA Service Management to manage ITIL processes, support tickets, and issue tracking both internally and externally. It is utilized for project management and lifecycle tracking, with Kanban boards and Confluence integration supporting change, incident, and problem management.

What are the key features of JIRA Service Management?

Customizable Workflows: Adapt workflows to meet business needs.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with other tools, including Jira and Confluence.
Real-Time Updates: Keeps teams informed and synchronized.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks with automated processes.
Scalability: Grows with organizations, accommodating increasing demands.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from JIRA Service Management?

Efficiency Gains: Improves operational efficiency through streamlined processes.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies adoption with intuitive navigation.
Comprehensive Reporting: Provides valuable insights to drive decisions.
Quick Setup: Fast deployment enhances time-to-value.
SLA Management: Ensures service level agreements are met effectively.

Service management platforms like JIRA Service Management are integral to industries focusing on managing IT services, such as tech firms and support-focused sectors. Organizations frequently utilize its capabilities to enhance their customer service operations, supporting optimal SLA adherence and efficient query management across departments. By tailoring its application to unique operational workflows, companies achieve improved service delivery and responsive issue resolution.

Atlassian

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Airtel, BSNL, Cloudnine, D-Vois, Geojit, Indian telco

mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada

Buyer's Guide

Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

May 2026

Free Report: Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,387 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Infraon Desk vs. JIRA Service Management report.

See our list of best IT Service Management (ITSM) vendors and best Help Desk Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Service Management (ITSM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.