We performed a comparison between Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Metadata Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution scales well."
"Multifeatured and easily scalable data catalog, with good data domain discovery and data profiling features."
"I like EDC's self-service capabilities. You can put the catalog on the intranet inside the organization, so users can search for something. People in the research world have specialized systems, and you might find data from various places that sound similar."
"The metadata management of Informatica is great."
"The capability of the tool to scan and capture the metadata from a variety of sources is one of the capabilities that I find most useful. The central repository into which it is going to put that captured metadata is the best."
"Matillion ETL is one hundred percent stable."
"The simplicity of this tool is nice. It has a good graphical user interface. You can also do a lot of generic stuff in the tool. If there is good connectivity to a cloud database, such as Snowflake, and you can have a lot of Snowflake functionality in the tool."
"The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL."
"The model is somewhat flexible. There are certain aspects of the model that are not as flexible as we would like. It doesn't do certain things to a great level of depth. So, in situations where we want to drill in to do something specific, we have to essentially copy that data into our own structures in order to add that additional layer of flexibility."
"Interoperability is one area where EDC has room for improvement. It was challenging when the faculty took over the data world and had specific vendors they wanted to use, and some were not particularly open platforms."
"It is not easy to set up and configure the tool."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"This solution is hard to set up and its interface is not user-friendly. It's also not as stable, and the technical support takes a lot of time to solve simple problems."
"I am looking forward to seeing the expansion of the source range for their data loader product."
"There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features."
"It can have multi-environment support. We should be able to deploy it in different environments. Its integration with SAP connection is not so nice, which should be improved. It can also support an on-prem database."
More Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is ranked 3rd in Metadata Management with 5 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 9th in Cloud Data Integration with 3 reviews. Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is rated 8.4, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog writes "An enterprise-scale solution with a pretty robust set of tools for scanning a variety of information sources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "A stable and scalable solution that allows you to do a lot of generic stuff and comes with good GUI and support". Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog is most compared with AWS Glue, Collibra Catalog, Denodo, Alation Data Catalog and Azure Data Factory, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica Cloud Data Integration and SSIS. See our Informatica Enterprise Data Catalog vs. Matillion ETL report.
We monitor all Metadata Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
