Imperva Web Application Firewall and Symantec Web Application Firewall are products in the web security market. Imperva seems to have the upper hand due to its flexibility and advanced features, while Symantec is more straightforward and user-friendly.
Features: Imperva Web Application Firewall offers advanced security controls, precise traffic inspection, and comprehensive reporting capabilities. Symantec Web Application Firewall is known for its simplicity, ease of integration, and streamlined protection.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imperva's deployment can be complex but is supported by robust customer service for a smoother implementation. Symantec offers a simpler deployment model with an attractive quick setup process and effective customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Imperva typically involves higher initial setup costs but provides strong ROI for enterprises with sophisticated security needs. Symantec is cost-effective, offering solid ROI through efficient protection and lower maintenance expenses.
Imperva Web Application Firewall is a versatile solution that protects web applications and databases from various attacks, including DDoS, cross-site scripting, and SQL injection attacks. It offers data security, availability, and access control and can be deployed on-premises or on the cloud.
The solution has good security against web attacks and offers advanced bot protection, API security, and mitigation features. Imperva WAF is easy to configure and deploy; it has good customer service and an excellent user interface.
The Symantec Web Application Firewall (WAF) enables you to secure and accelerate your web applications.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.