Idira IGA vs Imanami GroupID comparison

Idira by Palo Alto Networks and Imanami are both solutions in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category. Idira by Palo Alto Networks is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.8, while Imanami is ranked #35. Idira by Palo Alto Networks holds a 1.5% mindshare in IAMS, compared to Imanami’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Idira by Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Imanami users who would recommend it.

Idira IGA

Read 12 Idira IGA reviews

2,588 Views
1,216 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Imanami GroupID

Read 3 Imanami GroupID reviews

1,336 Views
628 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Idira IGA

Imanami GroupID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

Imanami GroupID and Idira IGA are competing in identity management solutions. Idira IGA seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features despite its higher price point.

Features: Imanami GroupID stands out with its effective group management, Active Directory integration, and streamlined permissions. Idira IGA provides robust identity governance, workflow automation, and comprehensive compliance reporting. The depth of identity governance in Idira IGA appeals to security-focused organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Imanami GroupID offers a straightforward deployment process and comprehensive support, making it attractive for organizations needing a quick start. Idira IGA, while more complex in deployment, is complemented by responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Imanami GroupID is noted for lower initial setup costs, providing a favorable ROI through cost-effectiveness. Idira IGA, despite higher setup expenses, compensates with powerful features potentially enhancing ROI through improved governance and compliance.

To learn more, read our detailed Idira IGA vs. Imanami GroupID Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Idira IGA vs. Imanami GroupID

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,942 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Idira IGA

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (6th), Identity Governance Administration (IGA) (5th)

Imanami GroupID

Ranking in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

User Provisioning Software (16th), Active Directory Management (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) category, the mindshare of Idira IGA is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Imanami GroupID is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla	1.5%
Imanami GroupID	0.9%
Other	97.6%

Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)

Featured Reviews

Sasikiran Sakalabattina

Associate Team Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Automated lifecycle governance has reduced manual access work and strengthens audit readiness

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla significantly reduces manual access management efforts due to day-to-day activities. RBAC and role mining actually reduce manual access management efforts significantly. RBAC is the best feature, and it provides AI capabilities. The second feature I value most is identifying lifecycle management for joiner, mover, and leaver scenarios. CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has one feature that provides strong access reviews, compliance reports, automation, and audit readiness with centralized governance. Centralized governance means we can handle everything at one point, making it a very strong feature. This is integrated with another feature such as SaaS integrations for strong security posture and faster provisioning with reduced operational overhead. These are the four features I value most, and with all my three years of experience, I use and appreciate these four features most. The impact of automation on my access reviews is that it automates the provisioning and de-provisioning. If I were to perform manual tasks such as provisioning and de-provisioning without automation, it would require a lot of time to handle. With this automation, we easily accomplish provisioning or de-provisioning. We simply get the Active Directory users and create the VPNs, cloud, and enterprise applications without any manual intervention. AI-driven role management and RBAC automation significantly reduce service tickets. Without automation, I would need to handle tickets, which involve a lot of manual work and requires additional manual employees. Without automation, this leads to approval delays and manual access assignment efforts. Automated access reviews provide simple audit reports, and by complying with the report, it improves audit readiness while reducing operational workload for IT and security teams.

Read full review

Jonathan Cauthorn

Identity and Access Management Manager at a insurance company with 201-500 employees

Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement

I'd like to see it be able to do more than just groups. I'd like it to be able to do some things with email distribution lists as well. It can do that, but there were a few things that were limiting. It was difficult to get it set up, particularly with Azure in the cloud. I'd like that to be a little bit smoother. I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools. We've got a ton of groups, and it does take quite a while to do nightly processing. This is something that definitely needs improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla's access reviews, audit report generation, and compliance features are excellent."

"I enjoy the ease of setup and creation of a review. Being a user of the tool or kind of an admin of the tool, the ease of setup of an access review is valuable."

"Overall, CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla helps us automate user access reviews, provisioning, and de-provisioning for both human and machine identities across hybrid and multi-cloud environments."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla offers unique features and is mostly secure and automated, and I strongly recommend this product due to its eighty percent less impact on access reviews, which is useful for audits, compliance, and security governance."

"After implementing CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, it puts the organization at a very high security level by reducing risk and threats to platforms."

"When we implemented CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, we definitely achieved a lot in terms of security, mitigating business risk across all assets, saving time, and reducing the risk of account compromise and access compromise."

"CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla has positively impacted my organization through the collection of audit evidence, the compliance workflow, and user access reviews, which helps me significantly."

"We had these spreadsheets all over the place, but now we have a library of evidence to consult when needed. Zilla keeps everything in one place. It's not scattered all over anymore."

More Idira IGA pros

"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system, and based on that job code, we use the query tool so that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should, which runs every night so that the next day everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."

"I have found the overall features to be useful."

"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla mainly related to automation complexity. Skilled people are required to handle these tasks."

"The first thing that can be improved is the central admin console."

"I believe CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla can be improved by simplifying the workflow and the UI for managing access requests and approvals."

"Improvement suggestions for CyberArk include addressing the on-premises deployment processes, which require a very skilled engineer to handle because of the complexity of the environments involved."

"Maybe this is coming with their AI module, but I would like to see a feature that performs baseline analysis of permissions that may not fit into a role, and it attempts to group them into a role. We've run into problems with applications where someone has not created a role but assigned ad hoc permissions to a user. We still need to do some manual work to identify the group that the user belongs to. It would be amazing to have Zilla streamline that."

"There is still no automated way to de-provision access as a result of a review, but they are getting there in terms of making it unified. They are getting closer to that."

"There is a higher cost model for the initial setup as compared to the other ecosystem lock tools like Google Cloud or Azure Cloud identity."

"For improvement, I would suggest enhancing the reporting functionality of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla, as it could benefit from more customization or advanced filtering for auditing purposes."

More Idira IGA cons

"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."

"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."

"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has been fair because we have been in from the beginning or close to the beginning. I know it is not truly an identity access management system yet, but its price was one of the appealing factors for us to purchase it at the time. It was reasonably priced."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"It is on a yearly basis, and it has the product license fee and the support for it. So, there is the licensing fee, and there is the annual maintenance that includes the support. I don't remember exactly, but we're probably paying somewhere in the neighborhood of $20,000 to $30,000 for it per year. We've got a pretty large implementation of it, and for the amount that we do, it is a pretty good deal. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Security Firm

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Construction Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Media Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zilla Security?

I am aware of the pricing and licensing of CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla. It is neither very cheap nor overly costly compared to other security service providers. Opting for multi-year subscription...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zilla Security?

I believe CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla can be improved by simplifying the workflow and the UI for managing access requests and approvals. Additionally, reducing the complexity of onboarding and co...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zilla Security?

The usual use cases for CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla that my customers work with include monitoring access, recording it, and session control, as we primarily operate in the health tech and fintec...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Idira IGA

Compared 16% of the time

Veza vs Idira IGA

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Idira IGA

Compared 7% of the time

Lumos vs Idira IGA

Compared 6% of the time

Opal vs Idira IGA

Compared 5% of the time

More Idira IGA Competitors

One Identity Active Roles vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 15% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 15% of the time

e-trust Horacius vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 10% of the time

OneLogin vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 9% of the time

Netwrix Auditor vs Imanami GroupID

Compared 9% of the time

More Imanami GroupID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Idira IGA

May 2026

Download Idira IGA product report

Buyer's Guide

User Provisioning Software

May 2026

Download Imanami GroupID product report

Also Known As

Zilla Security

No data available

Overview

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is designed to streamline identity governance and administration by automating access controls and compliance processes, enhancing security and efficiency.

Known for its robust capabilities, CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla offers comprehensive identity governance that simplifies policy enforcement and compliance management. It enables organizations to efficiently manage user access, reducing risks and ensuring secure operations. By leveraging automation, it minimizes manual tasks and enhances productivity.

What are the key features?

Automated Access Controls: Reduces the need for manual processes by streamlining access management.
Compliance Management: Facilitates adherence to regulatory standards with built-in compliance features.
Risk Reduction: Identifies and mitigates potential security threats with advanced risk analytics.
Scalability: Supports growth by efficiently handling expanding user bases and increasing security demands.

Which benefits or ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Provides robust protection against unauthorized access.
Improved Efficiency: Automates tasks to save time and resources.
Compliance Assurance: Simplifies the process of meeting regulatory requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Reduces expenses associated with manual identity management processes.

CyberArk IGA Powered by Zilla is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where regulatory compliance and data protection are critical. It helps organizations enhance their security postures while ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Idira by Palo Alto Networks

Imanami GroupID offers a sophisticated group management and automation solution, streamlining user provisioning and access control. Designed for IT professionals, it enhances operational efficiency and security.

Imanami GroupID specializes in providing automated solutions for group management challenges faced by IT departments. By simplifying access control, it ensures that users have the necessary permissions while preventing unauthorized access. Automated provisioning and dynamic management of Active Directory groups help maintain security and compliance. Integration capabilities with existing systems further amplify its functionality.

What are the standout features of Imanami GroupID?

Dynamic Group Management: Automates group membership based on set policies, ensuring accurate access permissions.
Automated Provisioning: Simplifies user account creation and rights assignment, reducing administrative burden.
Self-Service Portal: Allows users to manage memberships, reducing IT department dependence for minor changes.
Audit and Compliance: Provides reporting tools to track changes and maintain regulatory adherence.
Integration Support: Compatible with systems like LDAP and various identity platforms for seamless operation.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Imanami GroupID?

Enhanced Security: Automating access controls minimizes unauthorized access, safeguarding data.
Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, freeing IT resources for strategic initiatives.
Cost Savings: Lower administrative costs through automation and better resource utilization.
Compliance Assurance: Automated audit trails ensure compliance with industry regulations.
User Empowerment: Self-service capabilities improve user satisfaction and productivity.

Industries with strict access control requirements, such as finance and healthcare, often deploy Imanami GroupID to enforce security protocols effectively. Educational institutions use it to manage faculty and student access to various resources efficiently. Its adaptability to different industry needs makes it a versatile choice for enhancing access management across sectors.

Imanami

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Grant Thornton LLP

Buyer's Guide

Idira IGA vs. Imanami GroupID

April 2026

Free Report: Idira IGA vs. Imanami GroupID

Find out what your peers are saying about Idira IGA vs. Imanami GroupID and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,942 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Idira IGA vs. Imanami GroupID report.

See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.