Icinga vs Netrounds comparison

Icinga and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Icinga is ranked #41, while Juniper is ranked #99. Icinga holds a 1.1% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Icinga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Icinga

Read 17 Icinga reviews

7,233 Views
5,352 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Netrounds

Read 3 Netrounds reviews

1,622 Views
1,298 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Icinga

Netrounds

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Netrounds and Icinga are competing network monitoring and management solutions. Netrounds appears to have the upper hand in real-time network testing capabilities, while Icinga excels in providing comprehensive monitoring features and scalability insights.

Features: Netrounds focuses on advanced real-time network testing capabilities, validating tools that ensure smooth network operations. Icinga provides extensive monitoring features with various plug-ins for detailed visibility into both network and application performance. Icinga offers flexibility in tracking a wide range of network metrics, providing in-depth insights into system performance.

Room for Improvement: Netrounds could enhance its product by expanding its monitoring capabilities and integrating more plug-in options for broader network visibility. Additionally, improving scalability features and providing more community support could benefit users. Icinga may need simpler deployment processes and better direct support for resolving complex network issues. There's also room for refining automated insights to enhance end-user experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netrounds offers a cloud-based solution that simplifies deployment and management, focusing on direct assistance for resolving network issues. Icinga, while more complex to deploy due to its configurability, benefits from a strong community support system and extensive documentation. Users can rely on community contributions and resources for guidance and problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: Netrounds typically involves higher setup costs due to its specialized testing tools, but it delivers substantial ROI through streamlined operations and minimized downtime. Icinga, with a lower initial cost, takes advantage of open-source elements, offering a cost-effective monitoring platform that appeals to budget-conscious users seeking an adaptable solution.

To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. Netrounds Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. Netrounds

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Icinga

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

41st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (17th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (48th), Cloud Monitoring Software (32nd)

Netrounds

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

99th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Icinga is 1.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netrounds is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Icinga	1.1%
Netrounds	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer2292201

Innovation Service Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have but average multi-tenancy aspect

It's supported by the community. We use Icinga, which is not part of the Open-Source platform but is wrapped into a commercial solution from another provider, a local provider in Italy. Icinga is an open-source platform, so it is supported by the community. It's quite easy to use, and it's possible to customize the product as per the needs we may have. So it's not expensive, and it's quite a general purpose. We can easily monitor any kind of infrastructure we encounter. The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated. The alerting is the same as any other monitoring platform. It's not a "wow" feature that has changed our lives, but it's perfectly adequate.

Read full review

it_user738366

Head of Network Operations at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Fast and easy notification of problems on the network

Network quality monitoring of multicast TV channels and other network monitorings. This product gives us a good historical overview over the network and quick alarms for problems Fast and easy notification of problems on the network. The web GUI Grouping of jobs Making your own dashboards…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"People should know that it is simple and advanced."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"If you have a small infrastructure or a small number of devices that you want to monitor, then I think it's a good solution."

"I use it for monitoring infrastructure and it was very good for that issue."

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

More Icinga pros

"The live packet capture feature enables quicker troubleshooting and better network monitoring."

"Network quality monitoring of multicast TV channels and other network monitorings."

Cons

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

"The user interface should be improved."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"Network Discovery capabilities would be extremely helpful."

"The connection between Icinga and Icinga Web."

"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine."

"It is not really adequate for our current needs. It causes additional issues which we have to work around and takes us time that a better solution would not."

More Icinga cons

"The web interface is ok, but I would like to see if it was possible to group jobs better and to create our own dashboards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap."

"It's an open-source solution."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"The solution is free to use."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Construction Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 4% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Netrounds

Compared 14% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Netrounds

Compared 11% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Netrounds

Compared 9% of the time

Colasoft nChronos vs Netrounds

Compared 8% of the time

LinkSprinter vs Netrounds

Compared 7% of the time

More Netrounds Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Icinga

August 2026

Download Icinga product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download Netrounds product report

Also Known As

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

No data available

Overview

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Icinga

Netrounds offers a comprehensive suite aimed at network performance and service quality, providing effective solutions for service assurance and network diagnostics.

Netrounds is tailored for dynamic network environments, delivering essential features for automated active testing, monitoring, and troubleshooting. Its cloud-native architecture allows seamless integration with diverse network infrastructures, ensuring consistent performance and reliability. Netrounds' capabilities are especially beneficial for telecom operators and enterprises, enabling them to maintain high service levels and quickly identify network issues. The platform facilitates proactive network management, fostering operational efficiency.

What features make Netrounds valuable?

Active Testing: Continuous testing across multiple network segments to proactively identify issues.
Monitoring: Real-time visibility into network performance metrics.
Troubleshooting Tools: Comprehensive tools to diagnose and resolve network problems rapidly.
Automation: Streamlined operations through automated testing and monitoring workflows.
Cloud Integration: Support for cloud environments, enhancing flexibility and scalability.

What benefits and ROI should you look for?

Improved Network Reliability: Reducing downtime through proactive monitoring and testing.
Operational Efficiency: Lower operational costs with automated processes.
Enhanced Service Quality: Boost customer satisfaction with robust service assurance.
Faster Problem Resolution: Minimized time in identifying and fixing network issues.

Netrounds is leveraged across various sectors, including telecommunications and enterprise IT. In telecom, its active testing and monitoring capabilities ensure reliable service delivery and customer satisfaction. Enterprises use it for maintaining application performance across complex infrastructures, optimizing network investments, and streamlining IT operations.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

Telenor, Sappa, Clas Ohlson, Netnordic, Kabelnoord, Lunet

Buyer's Guide

Icinga vs. Netrounds

August 2026

Free Report: Icinga vs. Netrounds

Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. Netrounds and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Icinga vs. Netrounds report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.