We performed a comparison between IBM WebSphere BPMS and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its good automation features."
"The solution is stable."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Because of the central management, the scripting engine and workflow engine are integrated with VMware without any burden to integrate different products."
"It has the best workflow feature."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"Communication with technical support is very good. It has a repository of knowledge base articles which we can access which are very helpful."
"The solution's ability to template and easily implement are the most valuable features. It offers good replication as well."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
"I would like to see, from within the Web Console, being able to define the project and custom templates per user; almost like how CloudSpec has approached the solution."
"It is practically difficult at this stage to really comment on the improvisations of V central. But more tech events and PoC cases would help the EA to design better solutions and utilization."
"The custom workflows are very difficult and confusing."
"The solution needs to integrate with Cloud facilities like AWS and Azure."
"There can be compatibility issues."
"I would like to have an interface that can manage both on-premises and cloud solutions from a single console, where we can easily manage the resources that are being used or at least applications. Whereby clicking here and there from on-premises to cloud, or cloud to on-premises, depending on the requirements. If that can be accomplished, it will be extremely beneficial."
"The response time of vCenter Orchestrator's support could be improved."
"Mainly VMware integrates with other products, but there is no easy way to link with other products from a different vendor. We can integrate with other products from the same vendors fairly well, but if they could make it so integration is easier with other vendors, that would really help."
Earn 20 points
IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 32nd in Process Automation while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with , whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
