IBM WebSphere BPMS vs SnapLogic comparison

Read 24 SnapLogic reviews

208 Views
61 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM WebSphere BPMS and SnapLogic are leading products in business process management and integration. IBM WebSphere BPMS has an advantage in legacy system integration and complex process automation, whereas SnapLogic is strong in cloud integration and agility.

Features: IBM WebSphere BPMS is noted for its advanced process modeling and execution capabilities, ideal for enterprises needing high-level business process automation. It also integrates seamlessly with legacy systems and maintains a strong emphasis on security and compliance. SnapLogic's features include a cloud-native architecture with extensive integration abilities for cloud-based applications. It offers a low-code environment and a user-friendly interface that makes it accessible for non-developers.

Room for Improvement: IBM WebSphere could improve by simplifying its deployment process, which requires significant time and expertise. Its user interface could be made more intuitive, and customization options expanded to cater to diverse enterprise needs. SnapLogic could enhance its on-premise integration capabilities and provide more advanced analytics features. It's user friendly, but having more comprehensive training materials would support new users in maximizing the platform's potential.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapLogic's cloud-based deployment is straightforward, allowing for quick implementation. It provides an intuitive interface and excellent customer support, facilitating rapid adjustments and support. IBM WebSphere BPMS, however, involves a complex on-premises deployment that can be time-consuming and may require specialized training. Despite this, it still offers robust customer service, assisting with technical complexities.

Pricing and ROI: IBM WebSphere BPMS generally entails a higher initial cost, reflecting its enterprise-level features. It is best suited for large-scale implementations offering potential high ROI over time. SnapLogic offers flexible pricing models, especially attractive for businesses interested in rapid deployment and lower initial investments, aiming for swift returns through efficient cloud-based operations.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. SnapLogic Report (Updated: June 2025).

IBM WebSphere BPMS vs. SnapLogic

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM WebSphere BPMS

Ranking in Process Automation

33rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SnapLogic

Ranking in Process Automation

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (18th), Cloud Data Integration (12th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of IBM WebSphere BPMS is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Samuel Tsang

Senior Project Manager at Bank Of China(Hong Kong) Limited

Systematic role management and flexible integration improve efficiency, but low-code capabilities and setup complexity need addressing

The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems. The critical component is the authorization within the workflow assignment, which is an attractive aspect of this tool. It has helped us in systematic role management within the workflow. Additionally, it offers flexible integration capabilities facilitating front-end and back-end separation practices, allowing for technologies like Angular and Spring Boot ( /products/spring-boot-reviews ).

Read full review

VinethSuresh

Senior Data Analyst at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Achieves rapid results in data migration and has an intuitive user interface

I find SnapLogic to be user-friendly, especially for beginners with limited experience in data engineering or ETL. The interface is interactive, allowing me to quickly learn how to run pipelines and achieve production-ready results swiftly. This agility translates to cost savings, especially for smaller projects and proofs of concept, as less time and effort are needed to deliver results.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."

"IBM WebSphere BPMS provides significant return on investments, especially in the BAW component."

"The most valuable feature of IBM WebSphere BPMS is the systematic framework it provides for building different systems."

"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."

"Overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."

"The connection with SOAP is the best feature."

"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."

"The product is easy to use and has many connectivity options."

"It is a scalable solution."

"The solution could improve its API management."

More SnapLogic pros

Cons

"Looking forward, IBM WebSphere BPMS could add more adapters to integrate with SAP or Salesforce integrator in upcoming releases."

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."

"There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler."

"The solution lacks acceptable stability."

"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

"One of the areas for improvement in SnapLogic is that the connectors for some of the applications should be more available in terms of testing in the dev environment. Another area for improvement is that the logging should be standardized, for example, the integration with an ELK stack should be required out-of-the-box, so you can ship the log and have it in the ELK stack. There should be integration with ELK stack for the log shipping."

"There is room for improvement with APM management and how task execution looks."

"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."

"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."

"The setup cost would be four or five. There would be only one point of improvement if the price could be lower."

"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."

"While it performs well, there is some room for improvement in this area."

"One area for improvement in SnapLogic is the transparency in the flow of data. It needs to have more transparency. Right now, users only have a preview option at the end of any job flow, so at the end of any Snap Pack, there is a data preview option that lets you review the data and see how it's moving. What would make the solution better is more debugging and more access to change data from the preview panel or more functionality in terms of the preview option."

More SnapLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."

"It is a higher initial cost than other easy-to-use integration apps."

"The pricing is okay."

"The cost with SnapLogic is an annual license and better than Informatica."

"The license model is based on consumption."

"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"

"I used the free trial."

More SnapLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere BPMS?

There is a need for more capabilities in low-code and no-code development to increase efficiency and make implementation simpler. The tool currently involves a complex setup requirement, and having...

What is your primary use case for IBM WebSphere BPMS?

We use IBM WebSphere BPMS ( /products/ibm-websphere-bpms-reviews ) internally in the bank for process automation and management. Our IT department self-builds different systems to serve various use...

What advice do you have for others considering IBM WebSphere BPMS?

I recommend IBM WebSphere BPMS for large enterprises concerned with total system management. It is not ideal for SMB due to its complexity and the need for significant IT resources. I rate it seven...

What do you like most about SnapLogic?

Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently.

What needs improvement with SnapLogic?

I am quite happy with the solution and do not have specific requirements at the moment. I tend to frequently communicate with SnapLogic to ask for additional features, and they have been responsive...

What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?

I mainly use it for data integration and some API tasks.

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SnapLogic

Comparisons

No data available

AWS Glue vs SnapLogic

Compared 16% of the time

Compared 6% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SnapLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs SnapLogic

Compared 5% of the time

More SnapLogic Competitors

Product Reports

Download IBM WebSphere BPMS product report

IBM WebSphere BPMS

June 2025

Download SnapLogic product report

May 2025

Also Known As

WebSphere BPMS

DataFlow

Overview

Information not available

IBM

The SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform uses AI-powered workflows to automate all stages of IT integration projects – design, development, deployment, and maintenance – whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. The platform’s easy-to-use, self-service interface enables both expert and citizen integrators to manage all application integration, data integration, API management, B2B integration, and data engineering projects on a single, scalable platform. With SnapLogic, organizations can connect all of their enterprise systems quickly and easily to automate business processes, accelerate analytics, and drive transformation.

Sample Customers

Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia

Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!