"The scalability of the product is quite good."
"The performance is good."
"As compared to other applications, it has tremendous support. We have built internal capability so that we use it extensively internally. It is also easier to use with the outside data. You can write in ESQL, Java, or any other technology that you want to use for development. So, it is a lot more flexible in the language that it supports."
"It has good stability of the application server in the long term compared to other solutions."
"It does integrate well with the Tivoli Federated Identity Management system."
"This solution is easy to use with a GUI that is intuitive and very helpful."
"The solution has good performance."
"We needed this type of integration and WebShepere is the best tool for it."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"It should be able to serve more concurrent requests like Oracle. Oracle has more powerful stability, availability, and real-time serving."
"When compared with WebLogic, Weblogic is lighter and consumes less memory."
"Based on the field and based on the build that was provided, we've noticed a lot of constraints in terms of the performance now."
"The licensing could be improved, and I would like it to give the longevity of the lifespan of the visions. In the next release, I would like to be able to download and extract the files so that I can just use my application server."
"The solution could improve the integration."
"I think that this is a good product but I think that the cloud environment could be improved. I think that the future is in the utilization of the product in a product as a service way which is something that is lacking at this moment."
"In spite of the solution's robustness, it is expensive and a bit difficult to support."
"Some things are very difficult to do, so the interface and usage could be more intuitive for those."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
More IBM WebSphere Application Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 10 reviews while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 2nd in Customer Experience Management with 1 review. IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 7.6, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Bad documentation, does not scale well, and has a lot of complexities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Oracle WebLogic Server and IBM BPM, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with SharePoint, Oracle Content and Experience Cloud, WebLogic Suite, IBM FileNet and Oracle SOA Suite. See our IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. Oracle WebCenter report.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
