Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM is ranked #56, while OpenText is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.2. IBM holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews
  • 829 Views
  • 804 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
OpenText SiteScope
Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews
  • 1,881 Views
  • 1,655 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager are two leading solutions in IT infrastructure and application management. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature set, which users find worth the price.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

OpenText SiteScope is praised for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, flexible reporting, and extensive scripting support. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager stands out with its advanced automation features, deep integrations, and robust analytics.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

Users of OpenText SiteScope suggest enhancements in performance, more intuitive configuration, and better documentation. For IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager, users highlight the need for improved usability, faster deployment processes, and more straightforward maintenance.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

OpenText SiteScope is reviewed as easy to deploy, with users appreciating its straightforward installation and configuration. Customer service is marked as responsive and helpful. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a more complex deployment process but is balanced by its strong customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

OpenText SiteScope users find the setup cost reasonable and foresee a positive ROI soon after deployment. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager's higher initial setup cost is recognized, but users acknowledge this is justified by the superior features and functionalities, which ultimately deliver a significant long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: December 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope
December 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
56th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText SiteScope
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
17th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
29
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText SiteScope0.7%
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager0.6%
Other98.7%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

CC
Christian Campos
Sales manager at Prodeo Innovation
Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.
Read full review
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Gyanesh Rahatekar
Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd
Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts
There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."
"The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence."
"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product."
"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."
"They can create workflows for approval processes, which is very useful to support paperless digitalization, allowing effective collaboration between many parties including approvers, reviewers, and engineering documents being signed, annotated, and marked up using this system."
"I find OpenText SiteScope itself to be uncomplicated and deserving of a ten out of ten due to its simplicity."
"The URL monitoring is excellent."
"Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."
More OpenText SiteScope pros
 

Cons

"The user interface was not good."
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."
"I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action."
"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."
"There is a need to enhance the reporting feature in OpenText SiteScope. Reporting related to performance information for historical data needs improvement to provide better reporting related to application availability and end node availability."
"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."
"In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution."
"Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS."
"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."
More OpenText SiteScope cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."
"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."
"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."
"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
"Licensing is a little steep."
More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
27%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
9%
Non Profit
7%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise21
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring d...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 22% of the time
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 21% of the time
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 16% of the time
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 14% of the time
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 12% of the time
OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 8% of the time
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 7% of the time
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 6% of the time
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 6% of the time
More OpenText SiteScope Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
January 2026
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reportDownload IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText SiteScope
December 2025
OpenText SiteScope reportDownload OpenText SiteScope product report
 

Also Known As

Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
 

Overview

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.
IBM

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.
  • Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.

    • Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.

    • Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.
  • Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.
  • Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.
  • Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.
  • Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.
  • Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Michelin Tire Corp
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope
December 2025
Free Report: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.