Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. IBM is ranked #58, while OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Read 2 IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reviews
  • 645 Views
  • 613 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
OpenText SiteScope
Read 28 OpenText SiteScope reviews
  • 1,582 Views
  • 1,345 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager are two leading solutions in IT infrastructure and application management. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature set, which users find worth the price.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

OpenText SiteScope is praised for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, flexible reporting, and extensive scripting support. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager stands out with its advanced automation features, deep integrations, and robust analytics.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

Users of OpenText SiteScope suggest enhancements in performance, more intuitive configuration, and better documentation. For IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager, users highlight the need for improved usability, faster deployment processes, and more straightforward maintenance.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

OpenText SiteScope is reviewed as easy to deploy, with users appreciating its straightforward installation and configuration. Customer service is marked as responsive and helpful. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager has a more complex deployment process but is balanced by its strong customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager?

OpenText SiteScope users find the setup cost reasonable and foresee a positive ROI soon after deployment. IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager's higher initial setup cost is recognized, but users acknowledge this is justified by the superior features and functionalities, which ultimately deliver a significant long-term ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 871,408 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli Composite Applic...
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
58th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText SiteScope
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
19th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText SiteScope0.6%
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager0.4%
Other99.0%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

CC
Integrates well with IBM technologies, but it's outdated and lacks essential features
Implementing synthetic monitoring for our Internet banking site has been challenging. The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively. I have concerns about the complexity of the tool and the challenges in managing it effectively. The support provided is not satisfactory, and the specialists available lack sufficient training and expertise in using the tool.
Read full review
Gyanesh Rahatekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts
There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."
"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."
"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."
"The product's readymade templates are perfect. It supports us a lot when we don't have much experience with the product. The templates offers us direction to proceed."
"The URL monitoring is excellent."
"The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence."
"The tool has capabilities other than managing web-based applications, like URL Monitor and EPI Script. It is also easy to use the tool."
"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."
More OpenText SiteScope pros
 

Cons

"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
"The user interface was not good."
"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."
"It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository."
"The tool needs to support new technologies like Kubernetes. It also needs to improve scalability."
"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."
"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."
"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."
"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."
"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."
More OpenText SiteScope cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing a nine to ten. It is very expensive."
"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."
"Licensing is a little steep."
"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."
"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."
"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."
"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."
"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."
More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
28%
Government
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Non Profit
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?
The new version D2 has improved with a smart plan UI interface. However, while still using the classic WebTop UI, it looks outdated and not HTML5 compatible. They are currently in progress to migra...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Instana Observability vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 28% of the time
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Dynatrace vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 27% of the time
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
Catchpoint vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 23% of the time
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Logo
IBM Application Performance Management vs IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Compared 22% of the time
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Competitors
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 21% of the time
OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 15% of the time
Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 14% of the time
ManageEngine Applications Manager vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 8% of the time
Datadog vs OpenText SiteScope Logo
Datadog vs OpenText SiteScope
Compared 8% of the time
More OpenText SiteScope Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
September 2025
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager reportDownload IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText SiteScope
October 2025
OpenText SiteScope reportDownload OpenText SiteScope product report
 

Also Known As

Tivoli Composite Application Manager
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
 

Overview

IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager for Application Diagnostics on z/OS manages real-time problem detection, analysis, and repair to help maintain the availability, performance and general health of on-demand composite applications. it can gain in-depth diagnostic information for specific application requests to identify the root cause of problems. This software provides a consistent way to manage composite applications throughout Java EE application environments. Set alerts to help detect and fix potentially troublesome situations before they affect users. It can resolve performance issues faster and reduce downtime costs.
IBM

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.
  • Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.

    • Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.

    • Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.
  • Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.
  • Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.
  • Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.
  • Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.
  • Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Michelin Tire Corp
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Buyer's Guide
IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope
September 2025
Free Report: IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
871,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.