We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface."
"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."
"We are happy with the collaboration of SCCM with Patch My PC, which allows us to do patch work."
"The most valuable feature is the graphical-based reports of software updates that have been successful, the ones that have failed, and a summary of where the failures are what security breaches may occur."
"There have to be made some improvement in WSUS and control in other non-Microsoft products updates."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is very scalable."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is it's incredibly simple to configure and execute changes in bulk, allowing for seamless deployment. With this solution, you can easily track the status of all modifications and send them with ease, making it a comprehensive and efficient solution for any necessary adjustments."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager is valuable in keeping our systems updated. We are able to send updates to all the systems. Additionally, the Intune integration is helpful."
"It does the job and meets our needs. With everybody working remotely these days, we are using this solution to deploy everything. The deployment of PCs is easy."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough."
"Our company would prefer not rebooting computers while people are using them. There seems to be no strategy behind it."
"The solution is a bit heavy on the sources such as RAM or CPU and the software needs to be a bit lighter."
"The TSM component could be improved."
"The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"It needs to be able to load faster during deployment."
"The assets have reached their end-of-life, and patching them is a complex and laborious task. It would be highly advantageous if there were an integrated solution that provided distinct options for each end-of-life asset, streamlining the process and facilitating comprehension."
"With Microsoft Premier Support, you get what you pay for. There's Third Tier Support that you pay for. If you pay for that, you get excellent support, and if you don't pay for that, then you get the less experienced staff."
More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 17th in IT Asset Management with 1 review while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 76 reviews. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT writes "A user-friendly solution that has a good user interface, but its technical support is not good enough". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with BigFix, ServiceNow and BMC Helix Discovery, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.