We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM has everything you need in a cybersecurity solution. If you want to build a cybersecurity operation center version then I think QRadar is a perfect solution."
"The visibility it gives you into your infrastructure has been great."
"IBM Qradar's ability to simplify the number of events, not only on a technical level but by making that information easy to pan through the orchestration deduplication. It is very impressive given that we have hundreds of devices that send event logs through."
"Overall a great solution."
"It is a bit easier to use than other products, such as Splunk or ELK Elasticsearch."
"It's a state-of-the-art product for security information and event management (SIEM)."
"The solution is reliable."
"The interface is good."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is its performance and management. Additionally, the solution integrates well."
"The best thing about Kiwi Syslog is that it filters logs into different levels."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the alerting based on the security logs."
"Simplicity is the most valuable feature."
"We are very happy with the stability of the solution."
"The solution lacks vendor support."
"For the common needs of clients to fulfill requirements, a real integration with Blueworks Live (BPA modeling tool also from IBM) and a more suitable BPM on cloud solution for midsize customers."
"QRadar UBA only keeps the data for a short while (it's refreshed every five minutes) and would be improved if this were extended to a week or month."
"Technical support really needs to be improved. Right now, they aren't where they need to be at all."
"If you have too many events that occur, then the storage capacity becomes a problem. You need to have more storage."
"The technical support can be improved a little bit, and the price could be cheaper."
"QRadar needs to be more specialized, along the lines of what other SIEM solutions are."
"We would like to see better instrumentation for debugging changes in the log flow."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly and customizable dashboard."
"SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve by reducing the price."
"Technical support could definitely be better."
"I would like to have email notifications for emergency logs."
"I would like to see better search functions and better filters in the next release."
More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is ranked 30th in Log Management with 5 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server writes "Shows login failures and server issues but search functions and filters could be improved". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk Enterprise Security, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is most compared with syslog-ng, SolarWinds Log Analyzer, Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Snare. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.