IBM Rational Test Workbench and ReadyAPI compete in the software testing category. ReadyAPI has the upper hand with its user-friendly API testing suite and quick deployment.
Features: IBM Rational Test Workbench offers robust test management, automation capabilities, and integration with other IBM tools, benefiting large enterprises. ReadyAPI stands out with a comprehensive API testing suite, supporting powerful assertions and seamless CI/CD integrations, along with intuitive test creation.
Room for Improvement: IBM Rational Test Workbench could streamline its setup process and enhance the user interface for better usability. Additionally, improving its API testing options and expanding integrations beyond IBM products could enhance its appeal. For ReadyAPI, areas for improvement include increasing the depth of its reporting features, enhancing support for non-API testing types, and providing more advanced customization options to appeal to enterprise-level users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Rational Test Workbench requires a complex setup, optimal for large environments, and offers excellent support within the IBM ecosystem. ReadyAPI is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, making it ideal for quick adoption.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Rational Test Workbench tends to have higher setup costs due to its extensive features and enterprise integrations, offering potential long-term ROI for large-scale uses. ReadyAPI presents a more attractive pricing model, providing quick ROI for businesses focusing on API testing, with cost-effective scaling opportunities.
ReadyAPI is an all-in-one automated testing platform that allows teams to create, manage, and execute automated functional, security, and performance tests in one centralized interface.
ReadyAPI Features
Some of ReadyAPI’s key features include:
ReadyAPI Benefits
Some of the benefits of using ReadyAPI include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Dell EMC Unity users.
PeerSpot user Vallalarasu P., Test Architect at a tech services company, states, “ReadyAPI is one of the best tools for API testing because they have made a single platform for functional testing, load testing security, and also service actualization. We also have virtual work that can be an add-in within ReadyAPI. For integration for CACD, they have something called TestEngine, which can also be an add-on for ReadyAPI. We use Python request library and things like that but if you're a bigger organization with hundreds of APIs, then ReadyAPI is a one-stop solution for complete API testing. If you consider TestComplete and other products for an equivalent outcome, you might get something nearly comparable, butReadyAPI is the outstanding product.”
An IT Manager at an insurance company says the solution has “Fast automation, less coding, and is pretty lightweight. When you are working in sprints, you need to have continuous feedback. ReadyAPI definitely helps in automating very fast and rapidly. We have less coding, and we can more easily define our assertions. We don't use it for full-blown performance testing, but normally if you are doing your functional testing, it gives you the request and response time. Anybody who is doing functional testing can see what the request and response times are and raise a flag based upon their business affiliates, that is, whether it is meeting their affiliates. You can identify this during functional testing."
Balamurugan A., Manager at a financial services firm, comments, “We like the user interface. The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools.
They have interfaces with our performance tools, so we were able to leverage all of these integrations and plugins. It is very good from an integrative solution standpoint.”
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
