We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server and ReadyAPI Virtualization based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, OpenText, SmartBear and others in Service Virtualization."As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."
"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."
"Discovery option to create virtual services."
"The technical support is good."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS."
"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is ranked 5th in Service Virtualization while ReadyAPI Virtualization is ranked 3rd in Service Virtualization with 7 reviews. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is rated 8.0, while ReadyAPI Virtualization is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server writes "I would recommend it due to the robust infrastructure implementation and good technical support supporting standards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI Virtualization writes "Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming". IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server is most compared with Broadcom Service Virtualization, whereas ReadyAPI Virtualization is most compared with OpenText Service Virtualization and Orchestrated Service Virtualization.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
