IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics vs LogRhythm UEBA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics and LogRhythm UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cynet, Securonix Solutions, Rapid7 and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA.
To learn more, read our detailed User Behavior Analytics - UEBA Report (Updated: November 2022).
654,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's hard for me to pinpoint any one feature that's most valuable because it is all about consuming logs and analyzing them. We started using QRadar UBA because we needed something that could analyze Linux authentication information. Other products take care of the Windows platform.""QRadar UBA's most valuable feature is the risk rating of users depending on their behavior.""It'll get you from point A to B.""The timeline and machine learning features are great.""What I like about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is that it uses machine learning algorithms to generate risk scoring for the user activity. I also like that it syncs with our Active Directory users, so it really has full coverage for all users in our environment.""Blocks of predefined conditions can be used to configure detection rules without having to write complicated script.""IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics has easy architecture, has a good portfolio and integration.""The visibility it gives you into your infrastructure has been great."

More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Pros →

"Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents."

More LogRhythm UEBA Pros →

Cons
"The solution could improve by having more out-of-the-box use cases.""I don't give it a 10 because it is something we have to request. I would love it if UBA was included out of the box like Microsoft.""The dashboard and reports are not user-friendly or efficient so are of little help with threat hunting activity.""The AI engine could be smarter.""I'm not sure about the stability just yet. We've observed a few issues and we raised a supporting ticket for it.""Whenever we are upgrading or installing any type of patch, at that time we have some delays.""I would like to see more integration in place after the security lock.""What needs to be improved in IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is the user experience. It's not optimal. Some screens are a bit clunky. The solution needs to be more user-friendly."

More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Cons →

"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."

More LogRhythm UEBA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is an annual license required for this solution."
  • "We pay approximately $40,000 to use the solution annually. This solution is a lot less expensive than Splunk."
  • "IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is an application framework and you can install many applications without any additional costs."
  • "QRadar UBA's price is a little more than street price and could be reduced."
  • "The solution has a licensing model that is based on events per second so it scales to need and budget."
  • More IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
    654,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Integration is very easy and the reporting is good.
    Top Answer:This is a good product, although it does require some fine-tuning. The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search. The graphics need to be improved. Providing good support is… more »
    Top Answer:Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents.
    Top Answer:For our market, licensing costs are on the high side. In comparison to other solutions like IBM QRadar, LogRhythm is actually quite expensive. Their licensing is subscription-based and is quite… more »
    Top Answer:We're now exploring the cloud version but unfortunately we've found that they are lagging in that space.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,942
    Comparisons
    1,030
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    567
    Rating
    7.2
    Views
    1,548
    Comparisons
    1,240
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    470
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM QRadar UBA, QRadar UBA, QRadar User Behavior Analytics
    LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA
    Learn More
    Overview

    The User Behavior Analytics for QRadar (UBA) app is a tool for detecting insider threats in your organization. It is built on top of the app framework to use existing data in your QRadar to generate new insights around users and risk. UBA adds two major functions to QRadar: risk profiling and unified user identities.

    Risk profiling is done by assigning risk to different security use cases. Examples might include simple rules and checks such as bad websites, or more advanced stateful analytics that use machine learning. Risk is assigned to each one depending on the severity and reliability of the incident detected. UBA uses existing event and flow data in your QRadar system to generate these insights and profile risks of users.

    LogRhythm UEBA enables your security team to quickly and effectively detect, respond to, and neutralize both known and unknown threats. Providing evidence-based starting points for investigation, it employs a combination of scenario analytics techniques (e.g., statistical analysis, rate analysis, trend analysis, advanced correlation), and both supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML).

    Offer
    Learn more about IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics
    Learn more about LogRhythm UEBA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company20%
    Retailer20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    User Behavior Analytics - UEBA
    November 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cynet, Securonix Solutions, Rapid7 and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: November 2022.
    654,658 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is ranked 7th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 12 reviews while LogRhythm UEBA is ranked 13th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 1 review. IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is rated 7.2, while LogRhythm UEBA is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics writes "It has good support and works with Linux platforms". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm UEBA writes "Great at managing cyber incidents; the technical support could be improved". IBM QRadar User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Securonix UEBA, Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Microsoft Defender for Identity, Cynet and Citrix Analytics, whereas LogRhythm UEBA is most compared with Darktrace, Aruba IntroSpect, Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Securonix Next-Gen SIEM.

    See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

    We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.