IBM MQ and VMware Tanzu Data Solutions compete in the enterprise messaging and data processing markets. IBM MQ seems to have the upper hand in reliability and support, while VMware Tanzu offers cost-effectiveness and cloud integration.
Features: IBM MQ stands out with guaranteed message delivery, exceptional scalability, and robust stability, making it a reliable choice for critical operations in large enterprises. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offer powerful data processing capabilities, open-source flexibility, and extensive analytics features, which are beneficial for development environments and data-driven projects.
Room for Improvement: IBM MQ could enhance its offering by introducing more modern UI tools and improving cloud integration, especially for hybrid models. VMware Tanzu users have highlighted the need for better documentation and improved support for handling complex configurations. Both platforms could benefit from enhanced internal monitoring capabilities, though users often rely on third-party solutions for specific requirements with Tanzu.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM MQ has a strong record with on-premises deployments and reliable technical support, although some practices may seem outdated. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offer flexible deployment options and seamless cloud integration, though support quality can be inconsistent. IBM’s established support structure offers more consistency, but VMware’s hybrid cloud capabilities provide versatility for dynamic environments.
Pricing and ROI: IBM MQ is perceived as costly but provides significant value for large enterprises through its dependability and integration abilities. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions are generally seen as cost-effective due to their open-source foundations and broad functionality. IBM MQ users often report faster ROI despite higher costs, while VMware’s competitive pricing makes it appealing for innovative data projects that require minimal initial investments.
With containerized flavors of these products, we are having a tough time dealing with PMRs because the versions are new to IBM.
I would rate technical support as an eight.
IBM MQ handles many thousands of messages in a second, indicating good scalability.
In our environment, we do not have horizontal scaling for IBM MQ, but as demand increases, we would just vertically scale it.
Most of our functions or jobs are queued due to that.
The transaction is always guaranteed with IBM MQ, which is the main reason I have been working with it for fifteen years while dealing with financial transactions or messages.
We have never had any downtime or crashes since it's been running.
I have faced stability issues, mainly due to the storage my organization has, though I am not sure if it's specifically due to the tool.
Having a graphical user interface would improve usability.
We are dealing with IBM MQ client applications mostly.
I am not exactly sure about the licensing cost compared to similar products, but I assume it is affordable since we continue to use it, and it is also used by our customers.
IBM MQ is pretty reasonable when compared to IBM ESB.
These are financial transactions, so we do not want to lose the message at any cost.
We have not experienced any downtime or crashes with IBM MQ.
The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views.
IBM MQ is a middleware product used to send or exchange messages across multiple platforms, including applications, systems, files, and services via MQs (messaging queues). This solution helps simplify the creation of business applications, and also makes them easier to maintain. IBM MQ is security-rich, has high performance, and provides a universal messaging backbone with robust connectivity. In addition, it also integrates easily with existing IT assets by using an SOA (service oriented architecture).
IBM MQ can be deployed:
IBM MQ supports the following APIs:
IBM MQ Features
Some of the most powerful IBM MQ features include:
IBM MQ Benefits
Some of the benefits of using IBM MQ include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by IBM MQ users who are currently using the solution.
PeerSpot user Sunil S., a manager at a financial services firm, explains that they never lose messages are never lost in transit, mentioning that he can store messages and forward them as required: "Whenever payments are happening, such as incoming payments to the bank, we need to notify the customer. With MQ we can actually do that asynchronously. We don't want to notify the customer for each and every payment but, rather, more like once a day. That kind of thing can be enabled with the help of MQ."
Another PeerSpot reviewer, Luis L. who is a solutions director at Thesys Technologies, says that IBM MQ is a valuable solution and is "A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."
The head of operations at a financial services firm notes that "I have found the solution to be very robust. It has a strong reputation, is easy to use, simple to configure in our enterprise software, and supports all the protocols that we use."
In addition, a Software Engineer at a financial services firm praises the security benefits of it and states that “it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes."
VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
