Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management comparison

IBM and OpenText are both solutions in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category. IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.3, while OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM holds a 1.5% mindshare in EAP, compared to OpenText’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 64% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Read 17 IBM Engineering Workflow Management reviews
  • 367 Views
  • 57 Comparison Views
64% willing to recommend
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews
  • 853 Views
  • 38 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

IBM Engineering Workflow Management and OpenText Software Delivery Management compete in project management and software delivery. IBM shows a strong edge with robust version control and workflow automation, while OpenText leads in integration and flexibility, aligning with diverse methodologies.

Features: IBM Engineering Workflow Management provides a comprehensive workflow engine, version control, and traceability essential for complex product development. OpenText Software Delivery Management's adaptability, integration with enterprise tools, and flexible project management features offer seamless operations. IBM's focus on specialized workflow management helps in managing intricate processes.

Room for Improvement: IBM could enhance its integration capabilities across various platforms and streamline customization options. Improving user interface simplicity and extending automation features would benefit IBM. OpenText would benefit from reducing the complexity of initial deployment, expanding its agile and DevOps capabilities, and enhancing user support and training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Engineering Workflow Management provides straightforward deployment with extensive customer support and guidance. Conversely, OpenText Software Delivery Management offers rich customization but may require more initial setup effort, though it provides tailored solutions for flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Workflow Management's competitive pricing offers good value through enhanced productivity and faster time to market. OpenText Software Delivery Management is often more costly but delivers substantial ROI via its extensive functionality and support for diverse project needs. Both products balance cost with the depth and breadth of features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosts productivity by 30%, enhancing team efficiency and leadership insights with user-friendly tracking features.
Sentiment score
6.9
OpenText Software Delivery Management promises cost efficiency, reduced resource needs, and enhanced project management with automation and predictive analytics.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers reliable, skilled support with effective local vendor assistance, though customization and forum support are limited.
Sentiment score
7.4
OpenText Software Delivery Management provides efficient support with active customer engagement, though some users desire faster communication improvements.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable and adaptable, with some integration challenges and performance improvement needs noted by users.
Sentiment score
7.3
OpenText Software Delivery Management is scalable and efficient, supporting large teams and numerous users with minimal performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
IBM Engineering Workflow Management's stability varies with customizations, server factors, and deployment planning, affecting performance for some users.
Sentiment score
7.9
OpenText Software Delivery Management is praised for its stability, reliable functionality, supportive services, and high user satisfaction scores.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management faces challenges in integration, customization, usability, vendor reliance, and requires enhanced tools and cloud adaptability.
OpenText Software Delivery Management needs testing and integration enhancements, better usability, performance, and flexible features for improved functionality.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers flexible licensing with complex yet worthwhile pricing, yielding strong ROI and excellent support.
OpenText Software Delivery Management is costly but offers comprehensive features and scalability, potentially offsetting its high initial price.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management enhances software development with task linking, traceability, agile support, and seamless change management integration.
OpenText Software Delivery Management excels in Agile support, integrations, traceability, analytics, and adaptability for streamlined project management.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
For more quotes and insights, download the IBM Engineering Workflow Management report
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Software Delivery Management report
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (3rd)
OpenText Software Delivery ...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 1.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Read full review
GeorgNauerz - PeerSpot reviewer
A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing
I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
18%
Government
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
See all answers
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Jira vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 57% of the time
Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Endevor vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 13% of the time
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 13% of the time
GitLab vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
GitLab vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 11% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management
Compared 6% of the time
More IBM Engineering Workflow Management Competitors
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 45% of the time
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 26% of the time
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 8% of the time
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 4% of the time
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management Logo
TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management
Compared 3% of the time
More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
June 2025
IBM Engineering Workflow Management reportDownload IBM Engineering Workflow Management product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Software Delivery Management
June 2025
OpenText Software Delivery Management reportDownload OpenText Software Delivery Management product report
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane
 

Overview

IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.

IBM

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?
  • Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
  • Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
  • Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
  • Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
  • Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.
What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?
  • Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
  • Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
  • Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
  • Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
  • Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
Buyer's Guide
IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management
June 2025
Free Report: IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. OpenText Software Delivery Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.