We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Pak for Security and Splunk SOAR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Cisco, Akamai and others in Cloud and Data Center Security."The interface is good and very user-friendly."
"Our customers find it easy to conduct searches and consider it an excellent content management system."
"The automation part of the product is great."
"The best feature is the integration and the custom Python code that we can write. Splunk SOAR provides us with both of these capabilities, allowing us to integrate different security solutions with Splunk SOAR and take remediation actions directly on those security tools."
"The customization continues to be excellent."
"The product’s integration with other Splunk products is valuable."
"The playbooks are valuable. They are the core component. Being able to implement and build a code process to work through and scale out what we want to do is valuable."
"It's pretty easy when it comes to setting up assets. If you want to fetch emails or call a REST API, you can set up an asset and grab that information."
"I like the way Splunk interacts with various systems via the API. The ability to integrate Splunk with our ticketing system has been an immense help because we can maintain our workflow while blending Splunk with our support desk and other ways that we track work."
"Lacks sufficient technical support."
"I haven't used it fully, but based on my usage, I could not find simulation tools and features. It currently lacks simulation features, which are important for me for creating a playbook. It is also very expensive for my region."
"What we have seen is if the workflow gets halted or if we want to halt a workflow, it cannot be resumed."
"We want to see improvements made to the APIs such that we can connect to many different systems and data sources."
"have put a number of ideas on the ideas.splunk.com site for feature requests for the Splunk SOAR product. I posted one of them about three years ago, which finally got implemented in the latest release that just got announced, so the time to implement new features and things like that is a little bit concerning."
"The number of playbooks on offer should be increased."
"The Splunk SOAR platform was not designed specifically for case management which is why this area needs improvement."
"The scalability could be better."
"In the beginning, we couldn't find any specific documents for every function. It wasn't easy to navigate to what we needed."
IBM Cloud Pak for Security is ranked 21st in Cloud and Data Center Security with 1 review while Splunk SOAR is ranked 3rd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 30 reviews. IBM Cloud Pak for Security is rated 0.0, while Splunk SOAR is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Pak for Security writes "Great user-friendly interface; provides many functionalities and many free applications ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk SOAR writes "Takes most of the work away, but the time they take to implement new features is a little bit of concern". IBM Cloud Pak for Security is most compared with IBM Security QRadar and IBM Resilient, whereas Splunk SOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, ServiceNow Security Operations, Torq and Swimlane.
We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
