IBM App Connect vs MuleSoft Composer comparison

IBM and Salesforce are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. IBM is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.2, while Salesforce is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 5.1% mindshare in CDI, compared to Salesforce’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

IBM App Connect

Read 25 IBM App Connect reviews

2,482 Views
1,390 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Read 6 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,275 Views
638 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM App Connect

MuleSoft Composer

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

IBM App Connect and MuleSoft Composer are both integration platforms focusing on automating workflows and enhancing business processes. IBM App Connect has a slight advantage due to its comprehensive data connectivity and integration capabilities, making it a preferred choice for seamless data management across complex environments, while MuleSoft Composer appeals with its rapid deployment and intuitive design.

Features: IBM App Connect offers robust data integration capabilities, real-time monitoring, and strong security protocols ensuring seamless workflow integration and management. MuleSoft Composer provides an intuitive integration with Salesforce, flexibility in designing complex workflows, and low-code development capabilities, which simplify the process of creating and deploying integrations rapidly.

Room for Improvement: IBM App Connect could enhance its user interface for easier navigation and reduce the complexity involved in initial setup. Additionally, providing more real-time help for troubleshooting would improve the user experience. MuleSoft Composer could expand its integration to support more third-party services, enhance its error-handling capabilities, and offer more advanced features for complex workflows beyond Salesforce.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MuleSoft Composer's low-code design allows for quick deployment and easier customization, especially for Salesforce users, while IBM App Connect, although feature-rich, requires more expertise during deployment. In customer service, MuleSoft's targeted support ensures more direct assistance, whereas IBM provides a broad yet less personalized support framework.

Pricing and ROI: IBM App Connect generally involves higher initial setup costs but delivers substantial ROI through its extensive data integration abilities, making it ideal for larger enterprises. MuleSoft Composer's competitive pricing and lower initial costs offer rapid ROI, suitable for businesses prioritizing quick deployment and efficiency. MuleSoft's agile integration capabilities and strong support provide a significant value proposition for organizations focusing on speed and simplicity.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM App Connect vs. MuleSoft Composer Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. MuleSoft Composer

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,077 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.2

IBM App Connect enhances efficiency and ROI with centralized integrations, requiring expertise for long-term success across various sectors.

Sentiment score

7.6

MuleSoft Composer enhances efficiency, reduces costs, improves time-to-market, and increases value with easy integration and better data accuracy.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.6

IBM App Connect support is responsive and competent, but inconsistencies and delays exist, especially in non-urgent and local support.

Sentiment score

7.3

Users commend MuleSoft Composer's responsive and professional customer service team for efficient problem-solving and quick resolution times.

When opening a ticket with the global team, problems are resolved promptly and effectively.

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

The technical support from IBM is good.

AvinashArepaka1

Developer at Wipro Limited

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

IBM App Connect is praised for scalability in cloud and container environments, with suggestions for improved administration features.

Sentiment score

7.0

MuleSoft Composer is highly rated for scalability, efficiently managing varying data volumes and adaptable for organizations of all sizes.

IBM App Connect demonstrates good scalability.

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

I would rate the scalability of IBM App Connect as nine out of ten.

AvinashArepaka1

Developer at Wipro Limited

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.5

IBM App Connect is stable, with high reliability, though occasional issues arise from environment, configuration, or resource management.

Sentiment score

7.0

Users find MuleSoft Composer stable and well-performing, despite occasional glitches quickly resolved by support.

IBM App Connect occasionally crashes for various reasons, requiring problem-solving intervention.

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Room For Improvement

IBM App Connect users seek improved logging, interface enhancements, better community support, and simpler, more cost-effective version transitions.

MuleSoft Composer needs better platform integrations, interface, scalability, AI integration, and support for complex data and API sharing challenges.

I find it particularly good for on-premises and now cloud use.

AvinashArepaka1

Developer at Wipro Limited

Version 13 includes around 200 features with cloud platform compatibility.

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Setup Cost

IBM App Connect's annual pricing varies by transactions and partnership, with complexities and flexibility in setup and licensing.

MuleSoft Composer is considered costly, especially in Brazil and India, with users recommending a 20%-30% price reduction.

For insurance companies with simple JDBC connections, the process is straightforward.

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Valuable Features

IBM App Connect excels with robust integration, user-friendly design, scalability, and flexibility for seamless, secure, and complex integrations.

MuleSoft Composer offers Salesforce integration, ease of use, API sharing, prebuilt connectors, and effective data handling, monitoring, and notifications.

The features I find most valuable are message routing, message transformation, and protocol translation.

AvinashArepaka1

Developer at Wipro Limited

File operations are simple to execute, and converting between XML to JSON formats is effortless with IBM App Connect.

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the IBM App Connect report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

Categories and Ranking

IBM App Connect

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (25th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of IBM App Connect is 5.1%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 1.3%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Emirhan Guven

Team Leader, Software Development at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees

Transforms data efficiently and navigates licensing challenges with ease

The transition between version 12 and version 13 presents some challenges. While version 12 had approximately 10 features, version 13 includes around 200 features with cloud platform compatibility. The learning curve for developers moving from version 12 to 13 could be smoother. When using new components, better context explanations would be beneficial. In version 13, accessing new features requires connecting through a web browser, which can be challenging to understand. The explanation of new features could be more user-friendly.

Read full review

Prince Barai

Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.

The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved

Our customer’s system is very old. We are trying to upgrade it. We are extracting data from the system and sending it to Salesforce. The product is a good option if we want to build process automation for data. It can be done quickly through the tool. We need not do coding and waste our time and efforts. The ease of learning depends on the person who is learning the product. It depends on whether they come from a developer background. It would be easy to learn if they have some experience in coding and have worked on integrations. I haven’t faced many challenges while scaling our integration solutions with MuleSoft Composer. The drag-and-drop interface has not impacted our project deployment time much. The customer support and price can be improved. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM App Connect?

I like the adapters. The adapters help us achieve scalability. If you want to connect to SAP, there's an adapter. Salesforce? There's an adapter. You want to connect to another system? There's like...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM App Connect?

Configuration time varies by implementation. For insurance companies with simple JDBC connections, the process is straightforward. However, companies requiring multiple configurations for ODBC, JDB...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM App Connect?

I am a developer specializing in IBM App Connect. We have a customer interested in comparing ESB tools, such as webMethods, which was previously owned by Software AG company before IBM acquired the...

See all answers

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

It's costly, especially for Indian clients. Reducing the price would help them penetrate the Indian market. A two-year license costs around seventy lakhs rupees. It's a considerable amount.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

Configuration could be easier, but we were able to handle it. It seems that juniors find it challenging, but seniors like me know how to configure it properly. There are no issues. There is also on...

See all answers

Comparisons

webMethods.io vs IBM App Connect

Compared 34% of the time

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 20% of the time

TIBCO BusinessWorks vs IBM App Connect

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs IBM App Connect

Compared 9% of the time

SAP Process Orchestration vs IBM App Connect

Compared 4% of the time

More IBM App Connect Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 42% of the time

Zapier vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 17% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 16% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect

July 2025

Download IBM App Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

July 2025

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Also Known As

IBM Cast Iron

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Overview

Rapidly connect public clouds, private clouds and on-premises application

App Connect Professional is IBM’s cloud integration offering which delivers an integration solution
• With ease-of-use, flexibility and increased responsiveness to the evolving business needs, while removing the daunting complexities of integration.
• Provides the powerful combination of a ‘simple integration experience’ for business users looking to automate how their applications talk to each other; coupled with a ‘configuration based integration’ approach for IT.
• App Connect Professional is for the teams and integration developers who need to solve more complex problems and need powerful tooling for integration scenarios

IBM

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Sample Customers

United Way of Allegheny County, Saint-Gobain CPS, Ricoh, SunTrust Banks Inc.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM App Connect vs. MuleSoft Composer

July 2025

Free Report: IBM App Connect vs. MuleSoft Composer

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM App Connect vs. MuleSoft Composer and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,077 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM App Connect vs. MuleSoft Composer report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.