Venafi vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server and Venafi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server?
Yasiru Probo
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:We use Venafi for PKI certificates.
Top Answer:Venafi's overall installation could be made easier. You have to install the client, then go to the console and push the certificate.
Top Answer:Venafi has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other certificate deployment products. I would recommend Venafi to other users. Overall, I rate Venafi an eight out… more »
Ranking
59th
Views
47
Comparisons
38
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
18th
Views
701
Comparisons
406
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
301
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

AccessMatrix™ Universal Authentication Server (UAS), is a comprehensive and versatile authentication server that enable organizations to centralize all its authentication schemes in a single unified platform. It is a future-proof authentication infrastructure that supports multiple authentication mechanisms (such as passwords, OTP, biometrics) for strong authentication and authorization requirements.

UAS offers the freedom for organizations to deploy various authentication methods from different vendors under one platform, and manage it as a holistic security approach. This means organizations will not be restricted or locked to a specific hardware or software authentication solution. The use of Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) approach also allows organizations to have ease of adding new methods when available on top of their existing scheme.

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.
Sample Customers
AmBank Group, Cathay United Bank
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm22%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Computer Software Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server is ranked 59th in Authentication Systems while Venafi is ranked 18th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server is rated 0.0, while Venafi is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venafi writes "The solution has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other products". i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Authentication Server is most compared with , whereas Venafi is most compared with DigiCert PKI Platform, AppViewX CERT+, Entrust Identity Enterprise and Cisco Duo.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.