Microsoft Entra ID vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management comparison

i-Sprint Innovations and Microsoft are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. i-Sprint Innovations is ranked #27, while Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. i-Sprint Innovations holds a 0.5% mindshare in SSO, compared to Microsoft’s 24.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of i-Sprint Innovations users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Read 2 i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management reviews

342 Views
137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID

Read 235 Microsoft Entra ID reviews

23,813 Views
6,668 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Microsoft Entra ID

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

i-Sprint AccessMatrix and Microsoft Entra ID compete in the access management category. Microsoft Entra ID seems to have the upper hand due to its feature set and user satisfaction.

Features: i-Sprint AccessMatrix includes comprehensive access control, extensive customization options, and competitive pricing. Microsoft Entra ID integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, has extensive security features, and provides a more integrated feature set.

Room for Improvement: i-Sprint AccessMatrix users suggest enhancing reporting tools, simplifying configuration, and addressing tool complexity. Microsoft Entra ID users recommend better documentation, improved customer support responsiveness, and addressing minor integration issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: i-Sprint AccessMatrix deployment is complex and time-consuming, requiring substantial support. Microsoft Entra ID offers a smoother and more integrated deployment with reliable customer service and extensive support resources.

Pricing and ROI: i-Sprint AccessMatrix is perceived as cost-effective with good ROI for smaller organizations. Microsoft Entra ID is more expensive but delivers higher ROI through advanced features and integration benefits, justifying the price difference.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

27th

Ranking in Authentication Systems

36th

Ranking in Access Management

28th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Entra ID

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

1st

Ranking in Authentication Systems

1st

Ranking in Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

235

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (2nd), Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (1st), Microsoft Security Suite (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID is 24.5%, down from 25.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Nobuyuki Ohkawa

CEO at ABILITY LIMITED

A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing

The solution has high support capability. The tool needs to improve its cloud service capability. I have been working with the solution for 15 years. I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. I would rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten since it is highly scalable. We…

Read full review

Bahram Piri

Chief Executive Officer & Founder at IDmelon Technologies

Security focus and seamless implementation increase platform productivity

Microsoft Entra ID can be improved in many ways, and there's a big wish list.If we're focusing on security, something that I definitely expect is improvement in the UI and UX for frontline workers. This is important, especially for non-tech savvy individuals. It is something Microsoft Entra ID could do to improve for a wider audience. It's important to focus on the frontline workers since they are non-tech savvy individuals. They are not like those back-office engineering C-level employees who are constantly dealing with computers, and we need to build a specific user experience and user interface for them to handle this stuff. That's something I expect Microsoft to focus on more for Microsoft Entra ID.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature that I have found the most valuable is that they are open to connecting with any token. For example, a year ago, we were looking for a soft token, and we started to look for alternatives. They are open to connecting with any token that we looking for."

"The solution has high support capability."

"The ability to speed up ability is an asset."

"I like Intune's MDM and MI."

"Single sign-on provides flexibility and helps because users don't want to remember so many passwords when logging in. It's a major feature. Once you log in, you have access to all the applications. It also enables us to provide backend access controls to our users, especially when it comes to groups, as we are trying to normalize things."

"Microsoft Authenticator is highly secure."

"Azure Active Directory provides access to resources in a very secure manner. We can detect which user is logging in to access resources on the cloud. It gives us a comprehensive audit trace in terms of from where a user signed in and whether a sign-in is a risky sign-in or a normal sign-in. So, there is a lot of security around the access to resources, which helps us in realizing that a particular sign-in is not a normal sign-in. If a sign-in is not normal, Azure Active Directory automatically blocks it for us and sends us an email, and unless we allow that user, he or she won't be able to log in. So, the User Identity Protection feature is the most liked feature for me in Azure Active Directory."

"I would assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Entra ID as very satisfactory, as I am very happy with that. It covers our expectations and meets our requirements."

"I would rate Microsoft Entra ID 10 out of 10."

"I would say that Azure AD's pricing is very reasonable because of the structure and in terms of the solution."

More Microsoft Entra ID pros

Cons

"The tool needs to improve its cloud capability."

"The user interface is not quite good and easy to use. There are a lot of menus, and the look and feel is not modern like a modern app."

"The only issue is the OU is not properly synced. Therefore, you have to do a manual sync sometimes or you might lose the connector due to AD Connect or sync servers."

"I would like to dive into some of the things that we saw today around the workflows at this Microsoft event. I cannot say that they need to make it better because I do not have much experience with it, but something that is always applicable to Microsoft is that they need to be able to integrate with their competitors. If you look at IDP, they do not integrate with Okta."

"Sometimes, level-one support lacks the immediate information needed, causing delays in receiving appropriate support."

"I rate Microsoft support four out of 10. Tier 1 and Tier 2 support could be better. It's not timely or professional."

"The security policy of Azure Active Directory should be based on a matrix so that we can easily visualize which users have access to what."

"For the end users, it can be confusing if they have worked for another company that had the Authenticator app. It is tricky if they have already had the Authenticator app and then work somewhere else. If they have to download it again and use it again on their phone, it is something that gets complicated. I know how to get through it. They just need to uninstall and reinstall the application, but for them, sometimes, it is confusing."

"The ability to manage and authenticate against on-premises solutions would be beneficial."

"The product takes at least ten minutes to activate privilege identity management roles."

More Microsoft Entra ID cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten. The tool's licensing is monthly."

"Expensive solution, but if you look at the technical benefits it provides, the price for it is decent."

"We pay a yearly license. Licenses are very expensive."

"Be sure: You know your userbase, e.g., how many users you have. You choose the right license and model that suit your business requirements."

"The licensing model makes it difficult to understand the real cost of the solution, especially because it changes all the time."

"The pricing is good; it's not cheap but very reasonable."

"The process for buying licenses from Microsoft is somewhat messy and really hard to do. We have to talk to someone because it's hard to find out how many licenses we need. If I'm applying for 2,000 users, how many Windows licenses do we need? They could also charge less for support."

"The cost of Azure AD is one of the biggest benefits, as it is available for use free of charge when you start with Office 365."

"I'm not sure about the specific costs or how they're calculated, but essentially, the costs go up based on the level of security that is required by the organization."

More Microsoft Entra ID pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Duo Security compare with Microsoft Authenticator?

We switched to Duo Security for identity verification. We’d been using a competitor but got the chance to evaluate Duo for 30 days, and we could not be happier. Duo Security is easy to configure a...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Active Directory?

It is very simple. The Active Directory functions are very easy for us. Its integration with anything is very easy. We can easily do third-party multifactor authentication.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory?

Our experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Entra ID involves leveraging Microsoft 365 E5 licensing, so it's included. Being included in Microsoft licensing makes it mu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Venafi vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Compared 100% of the time

More i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management Competitors

Google Cloud Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Okta Workforce Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

Auth0 vs Microsoft Entra ID

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

August 2025

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report

Download i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID

August 2025

Download Microsoft Entra ID product report

Also Known As

AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Azure AD, Azure Active Directory, Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Authenticator

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

i-Sprint Innovations

Microsoft

Overview

AccessMatrix is a suite of integrated ICAM (Identity, Credential, Access Management and Versatile Authentication solutions) that enable organizations to effectively deploy versatile authentication, unified single sign-on, secure credential management services, flexible identity & role administration, externalized authorization, and provide comprehensive data analytics of access to important information assets.

i-Sprint Innovations

Microsoft Entra ID is used for extending on-premises Active Directory to the cloud, managing application access, enabling multi-factor authentication, and single sign-on. It facilitates policy enforcement and secure access, ensuring centralized identity management across cloud and on-premises resources.

Organizations utilize Microsoft Entra ID for robust user and group management, identity synchronization, and conditional access. Its seamless integration with third-party apps, scalability, and support for remote work make it a preferred choice. The admin center streamlines identity and access tasks, enhancing efficiency and security with features like privileged identity management and audit logs.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID?

Single Sign-On: Simplifies user access to multiple applications with one login.
Multifactor Authentication: Enhances security by requiring additional verification.
Conditional Access: Establishes policies that determine how users' access cloud apps.
Integration: Easily integrates with various third-party applications.
User Identity Protection: Safeguards user identities from threats.
Privileged Identity Management: Manages elevated access to sensitive resources.
Audit Logs: Provides thorough activity logs for oversight and compliance.

What benefits should users look for in Microsoft Entra ID reviews?

Enhanced Security: Offers strong multifactor authentication and identity protection.
Administrative Efficiency: Simplifies identity and access management tasks.
Scalability: Supports growing user bases and remote work environments.
Integration Capabilities: Compatible with numerous third-party applications.
User-Friendly Interface: Makes managing user identities straightforward.

Microsoft Entra ID implementation varies across industries. Tech firms leverage it for secure, scalable access management, while healthcare organizations utilize its identity protection features to safeguard patient data. Educational institutions adopt Entra ID for streamlined user management and policy enforcement, ensuring secure access for students and staff across on-premises and cloud resources.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

IRAS, Singapore Bank

Microsoft Entre ID is trusted by companies of all sizes and industries including Walmart, Zscaler, Uniper, Amtrak, monday.com, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

August 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Authentication Systems vendors, and best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.